|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><html><head></head><BODY bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p><font size=2 color="#000000" face="Arial">I had a similar problem the other day and tracked it down to installing the rainbow files from the equis site. I just reinstalled metastock and the problem disappeared.<br>Greg Harris<br>----------<br>From: Vilas Boas <<font color="#0000FF"><u>vilasboa@xxxxxxxxxxxx</u><font color="#000000">><br>To: 'Equis Suport - MetaStock' <<font color="#0000FF"><u>eqsupport@xxxxxxxxx</u><font color="#000000">><br>Cc: 'Metastock- User Group' <<font color="#0000FF"><u>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx</u><font color="#000000">><br>Subject: Not Loading<br>Date: Friday, September 12, 1997 11:04 AM<br><br>I am the owner of a MetaStock 6.0 bought some few month ago. I have being using it daily but today When I tried to load it it started to load, showed the initial logo and ended.<br><br>Then I desinstalled MetaStock and installed it again: The problem changed. Now it shows a message saying that the program executed an illegal operation and ends up.<br><br>Then I reinstalled windows 95 and installed it again and then reinstalled Metastock: the problem continues.<br><br>What should I do now?<br><br>Vilas Boas<br>----------<br><br></p>
</font></font></font></font></font></font></font></body></html></x-html>From ???@??? Thu Sep 11 22:05:55 1997
Received: from smtp2.nwnexus.com (smtp2.nwnexus.com [198.137.231.18])
by mail1.halcyon.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA03376
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.equis.com (equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by smtp2.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA13531
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:43:52 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id UAA18337; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:46:09 -0600
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:46:09 -0600
From: "Greg Harris" <gregharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Aussie traders
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:42:35 +1000
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BCBF79.5866A040"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <02482549200402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-Message-ID: <"rj0MI2.0.SU4.mpA6q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/4409
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><html><head></head><BODY bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p><font size=2 color="#000000" face="Arial">I purchased metastock 6.0 a fortnight ago, using it to trade the SPI.<br>Some very promising results have surfaced during the limited backtesting I have carried out.<br>Can anyone tell me where I can get historical data on the S&P 500 futures?<br>The new E-Mini based on the S&P looks very promising for those of us with limited funds.<br>Greg Harris<br>gregharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br><br>----------<br>> From: Michael <<font color="#0000FF"><u>epitrope@xxxxxxxxxxx</u><font color="#000000">><br>> To: <font color="#800080"><u>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</u><font color="#000000"><br>> Subject: Aussie traders<br>> Date: Friday, September 12, 1997 11:42 AM<br>> <br>> I've been a silent participant of this group for about nine months now, and<br>> have found it interesting, and sometimes amusing. I'm very grateful for<br>> the positive contributions of the more experienced traders and for the<br>> formulae, tips and pointers I've gleaned.<br>> What I'd like to ask is, why the general silence from Australian traders?<br>> Are you trading USA stocks? Does anyone have any comments on the ASX or<br>> SFE and Australian trading conditions generally? <br>> <br>> Let's hear from you.<br>> Michael </p>
</font></font></font></font></font></body></html></x-html>From ???@??? Thu Sep 11 22:05:58 1997
Received: from smtp1.nwnexus.com (smtp1.nwnexus.com [198.137.231.16])
by mail1.halcyon.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA13828
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.equis.com (equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by smtp1.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA07683
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:16:44 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id UAA18871; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:56:46 -0600
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:56:46 -0600
Reply-To: <datu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "vance aun" <datu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <dickj@xxxxxxxx>, <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <TKruzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"MetaStock User Group" <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Did I Get Screwed or Did I Just Screw Up?
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 22:51:46 -0400
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BCBF05.481C7EE0"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <19970912025238.AAA26563@xxxxxxx>
Resent-Message-ID: <"MarEw1.0.oc4.jzA6q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/4410
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><html><head></head><BODY bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p><font size=3 color="#000000" face="Arial">I'm with you Jim...<br>countless times my stop would get picked only to see it run back up by the close.<br>it ain't easy watchin the tape all day and seeing your issue tick down hard and not do anything, but, most of the time we will be happy if we just wait for the close, then we can place a market order to sell the open if we suspect futher down side after digesting the damage in the evening without the pressure of the tape playing with are head.<br><br>Vance<br><br>----------<br>> <br>> Jim Greening wrote:<br>> > <br>> > Tim,<br>> > First only 1/4 under is too tight of a stop. Second to avoid exactly<br>> > what happened to you, I never set a stop with a broker unless I'm going out<br>> > of town and away from a telephone. Floor traders have been know to take<br>> > out the stops and then run the price up. Instead, I set a mental stop and<br>> > wait for the stock to close below that stop. Then I put in a market order<br>> > to sell at the open.<br>> > <br>> > Jim<br>> > <br>> > ----------<br>> > > From: Tim Kruzel <<font color="#0000FF"><u>TKruzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</u><font color="#000000">><br>> > > To: MetaStock User Group <<font color="#0000FF"><u>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx</u><font color="#000000">><br>> > > Subject: Did I Get Screwed or Did I Just Screw Up?<br>> > > Date: Thursday, September 11, 1997 2:57 PM<br>> > ><br>> > > I would like to describe a trading situation that occurred to me today<br>> > > and get some opinions from you "salty and seasoned" traders.<br>> > ><br>> > > I bought a stock TRDT (OTC) about a month ago at 15. The bid/ask<br>> > > was bid:14, ask:15. Naturally I expected an upward breakout. The<br>> > > breakout came yesterday. The stock ended the day with a bid/ask of<br>> > > bid:16 1/4 ask: 17 1/8. In order to protect against a loss I placed a<br>> > > stop loss order at 16 just prior to the market's opening. To my<br>> > > surprise, 5 minutes after the market opened I received a<br>> > > confirmation call from my broker. My TRDT holding was sold at<br>> > > 16 1/8. As of moments ago TRDT has a bid/ask of bid: 17 5/8,<br>> > > ask: 17 7/8.<br>> > ><br>> > > Did I make an error in judgement with respect to where I set my<br>> > > stop loss given the wide bid/ask spread, or did I just get the shaft<br>> > > from a market maker? Any comments, questions, observations<br>> > > welcome. Thanks,<br>> > ><br>> > > Regards<br>> > > Tim</p>
</font></font></font></font></font></body></html></x-html>From ???@??? Thu Sep 11 22:05:59 1997
Received: from smtp2.nwnexus.com (smtp2.nwnexus.com [198.137.231.18])
by mail1.halcyon.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA21464
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.equis.com (equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by smtp2.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA17040
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 20:48:06 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id VAA19588; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 21:49:40 -0600
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 21:49:40 -0600
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970911224749.008e73f0@xxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: lissen@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 22:47:49 -0500
To: Paula & John <jhl3@xxxxxxxxx>, metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: MetaStock 6.5
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970911183023.006baf44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <970911164601_1061497564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Resent-Message-ID: <"3nuj51.0._n4.JlB6q"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/4411
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
V 6.5 appears to have a number of new features, and from the publicity it
seems to be a significant improvement.
Lets hear from the users of V 6.5 before passing judgment
Lionel
At 06:30 PM 9/11/97 -0500, Paula & John wrote:
>I don't. It's customery to release maintenance upgrades, free of charge to
>registered owners. Since 6.0 isn't very old, I presume this is a
>maintenance upgrade, and if they really are charging us for it, shame on
>them. I won't buy it. I'll wait for real upgrade.
>
>At 04:48 PM 9/11/97 -0400, you wrote:
>>Dick,
>>from what I understand, the cost is $59 + $12 shipping. I think this is
>>fair. Programmers cost money and as an investor, I'm sure you understand
>>this.
>>
>>Daniel.
>>
>>
>>
>>In a message dated 97-09-11 12:52:12 EDT, metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>writes:
>>
>><< Of course it's free, Fred ! Equis wouldn't have the NERVE to put out a
>> new version and charge us, without fixing the dozens of bugs in the OLD
>> one (that we already paid for) would they ?
>>
>> That would be dishonest, wouldn't it ?
>>
>> Yours in youthful optimism,
>>
>> Dick
>> >>
>>
>>
>>fredwat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Fellows,
>>>
>>> The new MetaStock 6.5 is now available for release. Is this for free
>>> because no price is listed and there's no mention that its free.
>>>
>>> Check this out at http://www.equis.com
>>
>>**************
>>
>>
>
>
>
|