[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DOW 30



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><HTML>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1008.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Not being an &quot;investor&quot;, I have learned 
that no stock is too high or too low. The rational way to me is to buy high, 
sell higher. The bigger fool concept applies to a bottom fish or a hi-flyer. 
Everyone should remember you are engaging in an auction, not buying a company. 
You only profit or lose when you sell in that auction.&nbsp;</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2>Richard Estes </FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From: 
</B>Robert Doeden &lt;bdoeden@xxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><B>To: 
</B>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
&lt;metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><B>Date: </B>Saturday, August 23, 1997 
12:05 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: ORBKF<BR><BR></P></FONT>Harry J. Kobetitsch 
wrote: 
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE = "CITE">&nbsp; <PRE>It looks like orbotech is on a trend. Would this be a good
time to buy? I am a little concerned about today's drop
on above average volume.</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE>This stock has trippled this 
year.&nbsp; They could have a process for making gold out of water and I 
wouldn't be interested.&nbsp; My money comes too hard to gamble on the fact 
there may be a greater fool out there to take me out at a profit.&nbsp; I've 
been investing for 40 years and I learned a long time ago not to buy after a big 
move.&nbsp; There must be something else out there with excellect growth 
possibilities along with low risk. 
<P>I like to buy good stocks after bad news not good news. 
<P>Bob Doeden </BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Aug 23 11:34:07 1997
Received: from smtp1.nwnexus.com (smtp1.nwnexus.com [198.137.231.16])
	by mail1.halcyon.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA28432
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 23 Aug 1997 11:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.equis.com (equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by smtp1.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA19668
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 23 Aug 1997 11:32:54 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id MAA00661; Sat, 23 Aug 1997 12:39:37 -0600
Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 12:39:37 -0600
From: Greatelto@xxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 14:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <970823141745_111162773@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Monitor
Resent-Message-ID: <"sXAXO2.0.DA.evo_p"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/3982
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

I withdraw my comment!! 

Let's forget the "hall monitor"....let freedom ring out for all!!

Jerry