|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1008.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<P><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2> VITALY</FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000000 face=Arial size=2><FONT>We distrust ignorance not all
people. Nothing is worse than ignorance served up with arrogance. You were
offensive, as you intended. </FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Vitaly Larichev <vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><B>To:
</B>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><B>Date: </B>Saturday, August 02, 1997
1:50 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: [Fwd: Square of time]<BR><BR></P></FONT><FONT
size=2>No intention to generalize, but ... why do champions of GANN/Fibonacci
<BR>approach have this misanthropic streak? Just curious, no offense.
<BR><BR>Richard Estes wrote:<BR>> <BR>> And What the hell does Elder know?
A simple TA primer that rehashs <BR>>indicators that don't work well. His
examples are futures, there is only <BR>>about 5 stock charts. But his book
seem to be appropriate to the level of TA <BR>>knowledge expressed in this
list.<BR><BR>>BTW: Where does Elder's money come from? Books? As I
understand he does not <BR>>trade much, and if he used anything in his book,
I doubt he could be <BR>>sucessful. You and others would do more for your
accounts if you applied <BR>>GANN/Fibonacci to your trading. But I don't
think many on this list will.<BR></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Aug 02 16:15:35 1997
Received: from smtp1.nwnexus.com (smtp1.nwnexus.com [198.137.231.16])
by mail1.halcyon.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA10851
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 11:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.equis.com (equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by smtp1.nwnexus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03809
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 11:56:23 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id MAA20908; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 12:51:49 -0600
Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 12:51:49 -0600
Message-ID: <33E3A9BD.7E55@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 1997 14:42:21 -0700
From: Vitaly Larichev <vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Square of time]
References: <199708021807.NAA10021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"uien_2.0.d65.57uup"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/3595
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-UIDL: 52ab0fcd5077ff28db86ab3fb3dcf300
No intention to generalize, but ... why do champions of GANN/Fibonacci
approach have this misanthropic streak? Just curious, no offense.
Richard Estes wrote:
>
> And What the hell does Elder know? A simple TA primer that rehashs
>indicators that don't work well. His examples are futures, there is only
>about 5 stock charts. But his book seem to be appropriate to the level of TA
>knowledge expressed in this list.
>BTW: Where does Elder's money come from? Books? As I understand he does not
>trade much, and if he used anything in his book, I doubt he could be
>sucessful. You and others would do more for your accounts if you applied
>GANN/Fibonacci to your trading. But I don't think many on this list will.
|