|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Robert:
Unfortunately the brains trust at Equis prefers to make minimum or poor
changes and patches and call it a new version. While Metastock has some
good pluses, the minuses are beginning to pass the pluses.
The feeling I get is that a number of MS users will drop Metastock and
move to something else in the near future.
Lionel Issen
At 10:22 AM 7/23/97 -0400, Robert Duplain wrote:
>I fully agree with you Joel.
>
>Metastock would add great value to their software should they add the
>possibility to group stocks the way AIQ does so we could make analysis at
>group and industry level.
>
>Also, should they add the possibility to capture fundamental data from data
>supplier like Quote Plus and give their client the possibility to scan
>stock on fundamentals then Metastock would be real leader in TA analysis.
>
>In the context of fast technological advance, the strategy for a company to
>stay in the game is to cannibalise its actual product. This means to
>develop new product that kills previous one. This is the best way to keep
>competition in the dust.
>
>I hope for Metastock than they understand that because some other companies
>do.
>
>
>================================================
>Robert Duplain Email:
> rduplain@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>================================================
>
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De: Joel Beck
>Date: 23 juillet, 1997 00:49
>À: meta
>Objet: Fundamentals?
>
>Hi Everyone,
>
>Am I the only MetaStock user that feels that fundamentals are an important
>factor in selecting a stock to invest in?
>
>MetaStock has a great user interface for doing technical analysis, but it
>seems to me that it's missing at least half (if not more) of the equation.
>
>I feel that based upon my (admittedly limited) experience, there are many
>more factors that influence the direction of a stock. I've read in IBD in
>AIQ's TradingExpert add that the following determine the price pattern of
>stocks: "49% is due to the industry, 31% to the market and only 20% to the
>company itself." I'm not sure of the exact percentages, but from what I've
>be able to see, that seems VERY accurate to me. If this is indeed true,
>wouldn't one be wise to take a look at these other factors in making their
>investments?
>
>Why don't I just buy AIQ's Trading Expert? Because I think that MetaStock
>is a more solid program and would add the following features would be
>
>
|