|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Ozzy,
Carl's point was :
<
I have to admit I have some difficulty to code at least a Plotshape
thing pointing a Digit1, 2, 3 on the chart to show the d-waves but
hopefully someone here will be able to do this??
>
So I send an unknown author formula to give an example of digit
plotting...if this may help him.
Imagine one day, Carl will share the killing formula counting Elliott
waves !
I am carreful to check if formula looks into the future, however some
interresting code can be hidden into useless indicator's formula. Of
course, Mike's comment is pertinent.
Best regards
ozzyapeman a écrit :
>
>
> Thanks Mike. That makes sense.
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Mike" <sfclimbers@xxx> wrote:
> >
> > Not all scripts are written with an intent to backtest. Looking into
> the future can be a useful visual cue for charting.
> >
> > Even so, forward looking functions can still be used in scripts
> intended for backtesting. You just need to add logic to delay acting on
> any signals until they would have actually been seen. There's an example
> of delayed Zig in the user library
> >
> > http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=353
> <http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=353>
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>, "ozzyapeman" <zoopfree@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Doesn't Zig look into the future?
> > >
> > > And this may be a dumb question - but if it does look into the
> future, then of what use is it for trading systems, since it can never
> give realistic results in backtests? Any function that looks into the
> future will obviously give near perfect results, that cannot be
> replicated in live trading.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>, reinsley <reinsley@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This formula can inspire you ...
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > >
> > > > //Patterns Wave
> > > >
> > > > _SECTION_BEGIN("Patterns Wave");
> > > > Change = Param("Wave Period",7,0,100,1);
> > > > SupResA = Param("Sup-Res A Period",20,0,100,1);
> > > > SupResB = Param("Sup-Res B Period",25,0,100,1);
> > > >
> > > > Res1 = ParamColor("Resistance High", colorRed );
> > > > Res2 = ParamColor("Resistance Low", colorDarkRed );
> > > > Sup1 = ParamColor("Support High", colorDarkGreen );
> > > > Sup2 = ParamColor("Support Low", colorBrightGreen );
> > > >
> > > > procedure PlotShapeAt( x, y, shape, shift )
> > > > {
> > > > PlotShapes( IIf( BarIndex() == x, shape, 0 ), colorWhite, 0, y,
> > > > shift );
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > bi = BarIndex();
> > > > sbi = SelectedValue( bi );
> > > > GraphXSpace = 2;
> > > > Plot( Zig( C, Change ), "", colorWhite, styleThick );
> > > > upshift = 15;
> > > > if( SelectedValue( PeakBars( C, Change ) < TroughBars( C, Change
> ) ) )
> > > > {
> > > > pt1 = PeakBars( C, Change, 1 ) == 0 ;
> > > > pt2 = TroughBars( C, Change, 1 ) == 0 ;
> > > > }
> > > > else
> > > > {
> > > > pt1 = TroughBars( C, Change, 1 ) == 0 ;
> > > > pt2 = PeakBars( C, Change, 1 ) == 0 ;
> > > > upshift = -upshift;
> > > > }
> > > > bpt1 = SelectedValue( ValueWhen( pt1, bi ) );
> > > > bpt2 = SelectedValue( ValueWhen( pt2, bi ) );
> > > > bpt3 = SelectedValue( ValueWhen( pt1, bi, 2 ) );
> > > > bpt4 = SelectedValue( ValueWhen( pt2, bi, 2 ) );
> > > > bpt5 = SelectedValue( ValueWhen( pt1, bi, 3 ) );
> > > > bpt6 = SelectedValue( ValueWhen( pt2, bi, 3 ) );
> > > > PlotShapeAt( bpt1, C, shapeDigit5, upshift );
> > > > PlotShapeAt( bpt2, C, shapeDigit4, -upshift );
> > > > PlotShapeAt( bpt3, C, shapeDigit3, upshift );
> > > > PlotShapeAt( bpt4, C, shapeDigit2, -upshift );
> > > > PlotShapeAt( bpt5, C, shapeDigit1, upshift );
> > > >
> > > > Plot( C, "", colorWhite, styleThick + styleCandle);
> > > > _SECTION_END();
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > cvanhaesendonck a écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My pleasure:
> > > > >
> http://books.google.be/books?id=GZtlA991lNYC&pg=PT105&lpg=PT105&dq=demark+d-wave&source=bl&ots=GsizxkEprO&sig=W4nDwR5okjqzZXGvugIwH589EKU&hl=fr&ei=eW7DSvCkI83A-Qb04v3uCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBwQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=demark%20
> <http://books.google.be/books?id=GZtlA991lNYC&pg=PT105&lpg=PT105&dq=demark+d-wave&source=bl&ots=GsizxkEprO&sig=W4nDwR5okjqzZXGvugIwH589EKU&hl=fr&ei=eW7DSvCkI83A-Qb04v3uCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBwQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=demark%20>
>
> > > > >
> <http://books.google.be/books?id=GZtlA991lNYC&pg=PT105&lpg=PT105&dq=demark+d-wave&source=bl&ots=GsizxkEprO&sig=W4nDwR5okjqzZXGvugIwH589EKU&hl=fr&ei=eW7DSvCkI83A-Qb04v3uCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBwQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=demark%20
> <http://books.google.be/books?id=GZtlA991lNYC&pg=PT105&lpg=PT105&dq=demark+d-wave&source=bl&ots=GsizxkEprO&sig=W4nDwR5okjqzZXGvugIwH589EKU&hl=fr&ei=eW7DSvCkI83A-Qb04v3uCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CBwQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=demark%20>>
> > > > >
> > > > > Basically, time and sequence constraints are added; something
> like this
> > > > > TD1 (that is EW1 D-wave) is completed when pre-TD1 conditions are
> > > > > filled; so here we go based on Perl interpretation on the link
> above:
> > > > >
> > > > > PreTD1= C==LLV(C,21);
> > > > > TD1= follows PreTD1 and C== HHV(C,13) ;
> > > > > TD2= follows TD1 and C==LLV(C,8);
> > > > > TD3= follows ...and.. C==HHV(C,21);
> > > > > TD4= follows ...and..C==LLV(C,13);
> > > > > TD5= follows ...and..C==HHV(C,34);
> > > > > TDA= follows ...and..C==LLV(C,13);
> > > > > TDB= follows ...and..C==HHV(C,8);
> > > > > TDC= follows ...and..C==LLV(C,21);
> > > > >
> > > > > I have to admit I have some difficulty to code at least a
> Plotshape
> > > > > thing pointing a Digit1, 2, 3 on the chart to show the d-waves but
> > > > > hopefully someone here will b e able to do this??
> > > > >
> > > > > Carl
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > > > Keith McCombs <kmccombs@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carl --
> > > > > > Can you summarize those rules and post them here?
> > > > > > -- Keith
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cvanhaesendonck wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tom Demark has made a great job simplifying Elliott wave
> count and
> > > > > > > making it more objective thanks to a straight rule set.
> Those rules
> > > > > > > can be summarized in few lines. Has anyone ever developed
> AFL coding
> > > > > > > on this. AFL library contains some Demark codes (now public
> domain)
> > > > > > > but nothing on d-waves.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|