|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "timekeeper_origen" <timekeeper_origen@xxx> wrote:
>
> Greetings to All,
>
> Question:
>
> I ran some daily predictions with a predictive system i put together and
> then looked at the trades in excel. I told the backtester my benchmark
> prices were not based upon Open or Close but upon the Average price for
> both the Buy and Sell side. A 1 day delay was also fed into the
> backtesting GUI.
>
> Getting to the point of my concern: would someone kindly educate me as
> to why in the following 3 cases returned by the run - when i called for
> a 0.5% profit stop - that profits could have been realizable in excess
> of that (or available at all), as shown in the sample below, and mirror
> real-world expected trading results?
>
> Ticker Trade Entry Exit %
> change Profit Shares Pos. value Cum. profit
> AXP Long (profit) 10/1/04 10/1/04 0.61%
> 49.45 222 9875.5 116.09
> Result: 0.50% profit
>
> CAT Short (profit) 10/11/04 10/11/04 -0.54%
> 1.11 7 271.19 315.25
> Result: 0.41% profit
>
> C Long (profit) 10/22/04 10/22/04 0.89%
> 163.29 529 21329.82 777.97
> Result: 0.77% profit
>
>
> I'm comfortable that I could have scaled out in the first AXP trade
> since the name moved up by more than that. So, i guess that's fine, and
> the punch out matches the stop I set, but the questions that remain are
> troubling and confusing to me:
>
> (a) how does the backtester know which came first, the low of the day or
> the high of the day?;
>
> (b) in the next Short CAT trade the name moved down by 0.54% so why was
> i assigned a 0.41% profit even though my 0.50% stoploss was also in
> place there i.e. why did i punch out there according to the backtester
> and not just wait for the 0.50% target, and lastly;
>
> (c) for the C Long trade, which moved 0.89% in my favor, how would I
> have had the forsight in real trading to take advantage of the 0.77%
> profit booked me by the backtester but waited so wisely for it to have
> gone up past my 0.50% stop and take down a tidy 0.77% profit instead?
>
> Again, did I even have the opportunity to do such a thing at all since i
> have no idea how the backtester is basing this upon the high vs. low
> range of the day since, depending upon which came first I may not have
> had ANY of these opportunities for profit...period.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Grateful for your replies,
> timekeeper (aka Richard)
>
Hi.
I think that a proper answer may require that we know exactly how your exit signals were generated, and possibly also exactly how you had AB configured at the time of the test.
There are many settings that might come into play here, and I don't think there can be a general answer based solely on the information provided so far.
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|