|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi all,
I agree with Markus. Either DON'T DO IT or at least not with parenthesis.
If everyone loves the idea, please, make it really distinctive with #, @,
>>, << and keep negative values to reference past values.
Y
--------------------------------------------------
From: "markhoff" <markhoff@xxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 7:31 PM
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [amibroker] Re: A shorter syntax to reference past elements of
array
>
> Even it seems that the proposal C() is in favor by most people, I'm
> not convienced that using parenthesis is a good idea, since it might
> cause confusion with function calls. Ref() is an internal function,
> but I don't like to see reserved keywords like C or Close used like a
> function as it would be for C() or Close(). My choice therefore is C@x
> (easy reading "Close AT 5 bars back").
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As a convenience feature I was contemplating for some time to allow
>> shorter syntax to very common operation of referring to past
> elements of the array.
>> As you now current syntax to refer to past is:
>>
>> Ref( array, -bars )
>>
>> So close five bars back is Ref( C, -5 )
>>
>> I don't have any technical problem with adding new operator that
> will make it shorter,
>> but I am wondering about the most preferrable "form",
>> that is easy to use and does not create confusion.
>>
>> So I would like to ask you which
>> "short form" would you prefer.
>> - C@x
>> - C#5
>> - C(5)
>> - I don't like the idea at all
>>
>> Please use this poll to vote:
>> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/surveys?id=2828485
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tomasz Janeczko
>> amibroker.com
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|