Fred my problem with all kinds of combinations like
in yr code is the following ...
Even with CMAE ...
Regards, Ton.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 7:55
AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Optimization
Question
One way to code this is as below ...
One could of course code in separate "Use" optimizable variables for each
of the indicators to allow them to be independently used or not on the
buy / sell side.
The default values in the optimization statements below were arrived at
from the best results based on CAR - MDD over the entire life of a common
Index using daily data. Notice that the optimization process determined
NOT to use the MACD indicator i.e. MACDUse = 0 but did employ the other
two.
RSILen = Optimize("RSILen",
43, 1, 100, 1);
RSIUse = Optimize("RSIUse",
1, 0, 1, 1);
RSIx = RSI(RSILen);
RSIBuy = RSIx > Ref(RSIx, -1)
OR RSIUse == 0;
RSISell = RSIx < Ref(RSIx, -1)
OR RSIUse == 0;
StoLen1 = Optimize("StoLen1",
16, 1, 100, 1);
StoLen2 = Optimize("StoLen2",
25, 1, 100, 1);
StoLen3 = Optimize("StoLen3",
99, 1, 100, 1);
StoUse = Optimize("StoUse",
1, 0, 1, 1);
StoK = StochK(StoLen1, StoLen2);
StoD = StochD(StoLen1, StoLen2, StoLen3);
StoBuy = StoK > StoD OR StoUse == 0;
StoSell = StoK < StoD OR StoUse == 0;
MACDLen1 = Optimize("MACDLen1",
32, 1, 100, 1);
MACDLen2 = Optimize("MACDLen2",
60, 1, 100, 1);
MACDLen3 = Optimize("MACDLen3",
48, 1, 100, 1);
MACDUse = Optimize("MACDUse",
0, 0, 1, 1);
MACDx = MACD(MACDLen1, MACDLen2);
MACDs = Signal(MACDLen1, MACDLen2, MACDLen3);
MACDBuy = MACDx > MACDs OR MACDUse == 0;
MACDSell = MACDx < MACDs OR MACDUse == 0;
Buy = RSIBuy AND StoBuy AND MACDBuy;
Sell = RSISell AND StoSell AND
MACDSell; ----- Original Message ----- From: longarm61
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009 12:49 am Subject: [amibroker]
Re: Optimization Question To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
>
Thanks, appreciate it. If it's not too much trouble, could you > (or
> someone) give me a quick example of how exactly that would be
coded? > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com,
ftonetti@xxx wrote: > > > > One way to do this is to have an
on/off ( 1/0 ) optimizable > variable for each indicator so that
individual indicators are > either > used or not and then let
optimzation make the determination. > > > > ----- Original
Message ----- > > From: longarm61 > > Date: Wednesday,
January 7, 2009 8:25 pm > > Subject: [amibroker] Optimization
Question > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com > > >
> > Is there a way to optimize a group of indicators so that the
> > > results > > > not only give you the optimized
values, but also tell you > which > > > indicators you'd
have better off not using at all? Something > > > like >
> > this: > > > > > > Best return:
Indicator1=80, Indicator2=NO, Indicator3=50, > > >
Indicator4=NO > > > > > > Thanks in advance, >
> > > > > Grant > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
__._,_.___
**** IMPORTANT ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
*********************
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
*********************
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
*********************************
__,_._,___
|