|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
> But what do I know.
Quite a bit judging ny your posts ;-)
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ohneclue <ohneclue@xxx> wrote:
>
> Stochastics is basically a mathematical differential equation used
in all kinds of industries to do all kinds of things. It is not
unique to the TA in the stock market analysis.
>
> If Lane bought him out, that was the ethical thing to do. But I
always see everyone saying George C Lane is the originator of the
stochastsics used for TA of stocks rather than he worked for someone
and bought him out. That could be true, I just don't see any
reference to that when I Google him.
>
> But what do I know.
>
> Judith
>
> ________________________________
> From: MAVIRK <mvirk67@xxx>
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:13:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT
>
>
> And the problem keeps on getting compounded .
>
>
> From: LB
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 5:17 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT
>
>
> And of course Lane didn't come up with Stochastics. It was the
man Lane was working for and Lane later bought him out.
> Lane I believe though was the one who smoothed the stochastics.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: MAVIRK
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 11:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT
>
> Can one use Stoch's with Mr. Lanes' Sefault Setting?
>
>
> From: Barry Scarborough
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 6:48 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT
>
> No, that is not correct. If someone publishes a formula and you
> optimize it and come up with different periods or apply it in a
> different way that is your work.
>
> Let me use an example to show the subtlety of this. Every car has
an
> engine and transmission. Every different variation has a different
> patent. There may be only a small variation but you would not have
to
> pry royalties on the new variation. You can do two things, publish
it
> or patent it. Once you do either then the work you did is in the
> public domain and no one else can patent your work.
>
> Barry
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com, Michel Guibert <michelg14@ ..>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > If I follow all the copyright , I can't do anything , everybody
has
> done everything before me.
> > Many formulas were published in many books or review and you
think
> there is copyright on them ???
> > Personnaly when they are published in a review I consider them in
> the public domain.
> >
> > MG
> >
> >
> >
> > To: amibroker@ .: ohneclue@ : Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:05:28 -
> 0800Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Whenever you write something, you own the copyright to it such --
> even these posts are the IP of the individual poster and they own
the
> copyright to the contents. Yahoo does not own it, the group owner
> does not own it and in the Yahoo TOS, this is so stated.
> >
> > In another group that suffers from overt estrogen overloaded, 1
> person wrote a guide, lifted whole posts of other members and put
> them in her guide (without credit or permission) that she sold and
> was called on it. The person who was charging for the information
> had to refund money and revise her guide to be strictly and
> exclusively her own words. That is an example of copyright
violation.
> >
> > I use and quote George C Lane and his application of the
stochastic
> formula all the time and it is NOT a violation of copyright because
> the settings are mine that I have played around with, I give credit
> where I have learned something from someone else such as David
> Elliott about stochastics settings, etc., and don't lift entire
> paragraphs or words in the same series as their works. These are
not
> copyright violations. These come under the fair and free use
concept.
> >
> > If I am discussing something from a trading book or manual that
is
> copyrighted and put it into my own words even though it is not my
> original idea, that is not a violation of copyright.
> >
> > If I write a book or prepare a PP presentation and pass the work
> off as my own when it is based on someone else's work and the
charts
> are THEIRS I lifted entirely, word for word or exactly the same
> indicator settings, other than my own stochastic settings I've
> developed, and sell it, that is a violation of copyright.
> >
> > The two elements are: passing stuff off as your own when you
> copied it from someone else and selling it as your own idea.
> >
> > Judith
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Barry Scarborough <razzbarry@ ..>To: amibroker@ .: Friday,
> December 19, 2008 10:32:28 PMSubject: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT
> >
> > No. It appears there is a lot of confusion on copyright laws. A
> good discussion is at http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Copyrights. OF
> course this isn't official but it is an easier read than the law
> books. People like Wilder published his works so others could
benefit
> from his discoveries. What the copyright laws do is prevent someone
> from copying his work and selling it. But the intellectual property
> he disclosed is for our use. Why else would he publish it?Barry---
In
> amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com, "binjobingo" <binjobingo@ ...> wrote:>>
> Does referring to Wilder's Relative strength Indicator,or Lane's>
> Stochastics, or Chande's Vidya & so on lead to copyright violation?
>
> > Say one reads An Author's book & am not able to write AFL for
the>
> Indicators & so ask the forum members to write it for me Is it>
> copyright violation?> > If one give a link to the Website say some
> other website which> explains the parameters & use of the
> said "indicator" but the website> may not be owned by the Author
> himself does it lead to copyright> violation ?> > If it is so I
think
> all the forums would close down & nobody would> discuss their
trading
> strategy since trading strategies use some> Indicator by some
author.>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
> > Drag n' drop?Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live? Photos.
> > http://www.microsof t.com/windows/ windowslive/ photos.aspx
> >
>
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
*********************
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
*********************
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
*********************************
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|