PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
An intuitive is a bright spark.
"Fly Me To The Moon And Let Me Play Among The Stars", Frank Sinatra.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxx> wrote:
>
> Jan,
>
> 100,000 repetitions indeed!
>
> Quite correct.
>
>
>
> However on the subject of 'mindNOT' and Samadhi etc.
>
> There are a lot of misconceptions floating around in the
west/modern
> culture, on these subjects, because of the mis-interpretation of
the
> spiritual tenents of our BROTHERS OF THE EAST by unqualified and
> unauthorised 'teachers'.
>
> There is a dirth of true spiritual teachers in the West, for
reasons
> that I won't go into.
>
> You are mixing up two different principles.
>
> In symbolic terms:
>
> CONSCIOUSNESS wears the CROWN.
> The objective NOT is the subjective ALL (THE LOGOS).
>
> You are confusing the "Son of God" with our "Heavenly Father"
>
> In general Kharma Yoga is the method for the west/modern culture ==
> the SOUL as an active principle == GOOD WORKS
>
> Pragmatically:
>
> Don't be concerned about NoMind - it is not for most of us - a very
> abstract subject beyond the ken of the majority.
>
> NoMind != mindlessness
>
> You can't achieve it because it is not there to be achieved in the
> way that you are conceiving it.
>
> Intuition is what we should be concerned with.
>
> Intuition is not mind reading OR an inferior psychic faculty i.e.
> inferior to the Concete Mind (objective logic).
> It is not the sixth sense, although we experience it as if it is.
> It should be more correctly known as super-rationality.
> It is our higher mind (also know as the Higher Self, the OverSoul,
> The Solar Angel, Abstract Mind, Manas).
> It bridges the gap between Heaven and Earth.
>
> In trading it is most appropriately used along the lines
of 'positive
> thinking', the 'power of the mind', 'untapped levels of
> consciousness' etc which is the popular form of it in the USA where
> it is a pseudo-religion (the reason for that is that it is so
aligned
> to the methods that are appropriate for the times).
>
> These methods are safe to use but it is very unfortunate if the
> admonition to do GOOD WORKS doesn't accompany them.
>
>
> In your case; you and your trading are working well and if it ain't
> broke don't fix it.
>
> Forget your search for the spiritual Holy Grail of NoMind - that is
> an impossible dream because it doesn't exist.
>
> I wouldn't worry about your personal spiritual welfare - you seem
to
> be sitting quite pretty.
>
> brian_z *:-)
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jan Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well, I had 6 years of martial arts training, where I understood
> (but
> > unfortunately not yet attained) the principle of "no-mind" when
> executing
> > tasks. I have also had some limited time as a military
instructor,
> and it
> > became obvious that during patrol and combat, when people fire at
> you
> > (blanks and smoke grenades, but still), there ones who make it
are
> the ones
> > who do not take the time to think.
> >
> >
> >
> > However, ones ability to enter this state of mind is dependent on
> having
> > enough training so that you subconsciously know that you really
do
> not have
> > to think about how to move and shoot properly.
> >
> >
> >
> > Of the Tekki Shodan pattern, the ancient warriors said something
to
> the
> > effect of "Most patterns require at least 10 000 executions
before
> being
> > mastered. However, you should not even consider demonstrating
Tekki
> Shodan
> > to your master before you have had 100 000 repetitions."
> >
> >
> >
> > It is interesting to note that to reach the original state of
mind
> while
> > carrying out un-natural activities, you do need lots of training,
> and that
> > some things in every field are a lot more difficult than the
> average task in
> > that skill set.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards / JM
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> För
> > brian_z111
> > Skickat: den 1 augusti 2008 05:32
> > Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Ämne: Re: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?
> >
> >
> >
> > > 3. Level of spiritual attainment.
> >
> > Semantics plays a part in any discussion, especially when we are
> > crossing cultures etc. It plays a greater role in 'spiritual'
> > discussion than it does in any other.
> >
> > So, first the semantics.
> >
> > We are not limited to the term 'spirituality' as we can talk
around
> > the same area in many different terms (objective mind/subjective
> > mind, rational/intuitive, super-consciousness, super-rationality
> the
> > collective unconscious, God, the Soul, the Divine, the Supreme
and
> > millions more).
> >
> > For ease of discussion I will stick with 'spirituality'.
> >
> > A few basic points:
> >
> > - generally the 'spiritual gene' is latent in humanity, across
all
> > cultures
> > - it is more virile in a small %
> > - it is particularly latent in the West/modern culture where we
> have
> > turned our back on our spirituality
> > - I dare say this forum has more than its share of latent
> > spirituality under the surface
> > - the psychic opposites are not antagonistic forces e.g. soul
> versus
> > body but rather a complimentary whole so that is not a matter of
> > logic/programming trading versus intuitive/discretionary trading.
> We
> > are all using both, at different times and places, even those who
> > deny it (there is no such thing as a 100% objective/rational
> person).
> > - a healthy psyche has a good balance and flows between each
> psychic
> > pole in its own season.
> >
> > The main pragmatic points:
> >
> > - we can't bootstrap our subjective mind so we have to turn to
> > mentors for written or oral teaching
> > - some have more aptitude for it than others
> > - I was very priviliged to have some experience in these matters
> long
> > before I started trading (my subjective consciousness/soul was
> > already active and able to express itself in the world) but it
> still
> > took years of pragmatic, practical, objective work to 'program'
the
> > trading mind to match i.e. I had to pass a sufficient number of
> > exams, in the core units, at the 'University of Trading', before
I
> > could 'enter the trading zone'.
> >
> > In laymans terms, my intuitive mind was functioning but I still
had
> > to go out and tediously train my rational/objective mind, and
learn
> > as many of the objective rules of trading as I could, before the
> > subjective and the objective minds could synchronize in the
trading
> > room.
> >
> > "Give unto Caeser that which is Caesers AND give homage to your
> God".
> >
> > brian_z
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com, "Jan
> > Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I sometimes daytrade using even delayed data for the charts,
and
> a
> > list
> > > compiled list stored in my broker's web application. It works
> > alright. Most
> > > of the time I do short-to-mid-term swing trading. With just the
> 15-
> > min
> > > delayed data. Ok, real-time for the indexes.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's my opinion.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The three components that determine your success are usually:
> > >
> > > 1. Level of analysis. How good you can produce low-risk entries
> > with a
> > > probable future outcome, which of course is never totally
> possible.
> > > 2. Level of money management. How much you bet on one single
> > trade, how
> > > well you scale in, scale out, set and stick to stop-orders, and
> > more.
> > > 3. Level of spiritual attainment. How much you have attained the
> > > "no-mind" state of the ancient warriors and spiritually
achieved
> > people.
> > > Which means that you fearlessly execute trades while
maintaining a
> > > risk-appropriate behavior. Only really possible when you no
> longer
> > fear the
> > > horrible market and what it might do to you.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Which one is most important? The one you lack the most at the
> > moment. I was
> > > fortunate to start out with fairly solid money management from
> the
> > start.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards / JM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > >
> > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com
> > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com]
> > On Behalf
> > > Of Louis P.
> > > Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2008 2:15 PM
> > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com
> > > Subject: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was only wondering... Anyone actually making money or making
a
> > living
> > > with AB and trading?
> > >
> > > I've been working on ideas and plans for over 7 months now and
> > didn't find
> > > anything convincing yet. I've been searching daily data, then
> > hourly,
> > > 15-minute and now I am into 1-minute data and nothing seems
> > satisfying.
> > > Been searching RSI, MFI, ADX, MA, HHV, LLV... nothing seems to
> work.
> > >
> > > So... Anyone is making consistent money with this, and if so,
at
> > which
> > > timeframe and how do you do it?
> > >
> > > I'm beginning to think about switching to tick database; it
seems
> > even
> > > 1-minute is too slow for intraday trading. Anyone making money
> with
> > > 1-minute?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Louis
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|