[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Monte Carlo Howard Bandy style



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello,

Apologies as I've asked a similar question before;

It is suggested that if a system is more robust (less curve fitted), 
its' performance shouldn't be affected too much by the addition of 
noise.

I have coded Howard's "monte-carlo" code into the code of a trading 
system and optimised the noise. I've ranked the results by the 
increasing addition of noise and the following happens;

The net return % decreases as noise is added
The RAR increases as noise is added (basically less trades are taken, 
but the quality of them increases) as noise is added
My custom metric (a factor of Kelly, RAR, CAR/MDD an Net% profit) 
increases with increased noise.

My question - what performance stat should I be comparing to the 
noise, and is it realistic that my system's performance should 
IMPROVE with the addition of noise, by these measures?

All contributions welcome.

Cheers,
Rich


------------------------------------

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/