Nice :-)
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
-----
Original Message -----
From: "bruce1r" <brucer@xxxxxxnet>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com>
Sent:
Monday, July 07, 2008 5:51 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Code help please...
Optimize with CMAE
> Dennis -
>
> I don't post here
much, but was about to post something else and saw
> this. Sometimes I
can't resist a challenge. It looks like you want
> to experiment with
CMAE as a general purpose function optimizer.
> First, I concur with
others - the best way is to write a DLL. But, if
> you just want to play
...
>
> Warning, this is a hack - and hack is not being used in
the good way
> here. But it will allow you to play.
>
> 1.
Setup AA to current symbol and set the Optimization target to
>
"objective" in AA Settings / Walk-Forward
>
> 2. Optimize the
following code. It is set for CMAE, but you might
> also find the
commented out SPSO interesting. I've also done my best
> to re-express
your objective function to what I think you meant.
> Check the
comments.
> _____
>
> //REMEMBER - Set the Optimization
target to "objective" in AA Settings
> / Walk-Forward
>
>
//OptimizerSetEngine( "spso" );
> //OptimizerSetOption(
"Runs", 2 );
> //OptimizerSetOption( "MaxEval", 1000 );
>
> OptimizerSetEngine("cmae");
>
> X = Optimize( "X",
1, 1, 100, 0.1 );
> Y = Optimize( "Y", 1, 1, 100, 0.1 );
>
> Buy = Sell = Short = Cover = 0;
>
>
SetOption("UseCustomBacktestProc", True );
>
> if (
Status( "action" ) == actionPortfolio )
> {
> bo =
GetBacktesterObject( );
> bo.Backtest( );
> // The original
goal appeared to be to minimize the error of 100 - X*Y,
> // AND to
minimize the difference between X and Y. In other words, a
> // result
of X=10 and Y=10.
> // Note that this must be expressed as an objective
to be maximized.
> Objective = - abs( 100 - X * Y ) - abs( X - Y
);
> bo.AddCustomMetric( "objective", Objective );
> }
>
_____
>
> It should be obvious how to setup any parameters and an
objective.
> Hack doesn't seem strong enough, but it was an interesting
diversion.
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com,
"Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> wrote:
>>
>>
Hello,
>>
>> In that case just look at the CMAE docs (the
read me is inside "cmaes")
>> If this is too complicated, you may
need to use SciLab for example
>> www.scilab.org
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tomasz
Janeczko
>> amibroker.com
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Dennis Brown
>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:46 PM
>> Subject: Re:
[amibroker] Code help please... Optimize with CMAE
>>
>>
>> Thank you both for continuing to provide help.
>>
>>
>> I really do not need to solve an exhaustive search
for two
> variables with a simplistic objective. I really need to
solve
> problems that have many variables and a very complex objective
formula
> that is not suitable for an exhaustive search.
>>
>>
>> I only provided this simplest of all cases so the
the problem
> would not get in the way of my question of how to connect
this simple
> case to the CMAE engine.
>>
>>
>> If that is too complicated to address on this list, then I
will
> have to look elsewhere for help.
>>
>>
>> Again, thank you for your responses,
>>
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2008, at
9:19 AM, Tomasz Janeczko wrote:
>>
>>
>>
Hello,
>>
>> Here is the simplest exhaustive search
sample:
>>
>> function Objective( x, y )
>> {
>> return sin(x) * cos(y);
>> }
>>
>>
xmin = 0;
>> xmax = 100;
>> xstep = 1;
>> xbest
= Null;
>> ymin = 0;
>> ymax = 100;
>> ystep =
1;
>> ybest = Null;
>>
>>
>> best =
-1e9;
>>
>> for( x = xmin; x <= xmax; x += xstep )
>> for( y = ymin; y <= ymax; y += ystep )
>> {
>> f = Objective( x, y );
>>
>> if( f > best
)
>> {
>> best = f;
>> xbest = x;
>>
ybest = y;
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
printf("Best f = %g, at x = %g, y = %g", best, xbest, ybest );
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tomasz Janeczko
>>
amibroker.com
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Paul
Ho
>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
>>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 2:29 PM
>> Subject: RE: [amibroker] Code
help please... Optimize with CMAE
>>
>>
>> I
think using an exhaustive search would be a way to start.
> since you
only have 2 parameters, you can also put a little bit of
> smart in
there yourself.
>> for example, if X*Y == 100 or close to that. there
can be a
> constraint in place to restrict the range of Y searched for
a
> particular value of X, and vice versa,
>>
Cheers
>> Paul.
>>
>>
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------
>>
From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
>
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com]
On Behalf Of Dennis Brown
>> Sent: Monday, 7 July 2008 10:17
PM
>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
>>
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Code help please... Optimize with CMAE
>>
>>
>> Tomasz and Paul,
>>
>> Thank you
for responding.
>>
>> Yes, I also had looked at those
sources, but being that I am
> able to
>> only stumble along
with C++, it is Greek to me.
>>
>> I think I would be
better off trying to understand how to
> modify the
>>
AmiBroker plugin DLL to call back my AFL objective function.
>>
>> It is still Greek, but at least it is a simpler and
>
meaningful Greek
>> phrase to start with.
>>
>> I
would still welcome any specific advice or hints in areas
> that I am
>> likely to stumble over.
>>
>> Best
regards,
>> Dennis
>>
>> > On Jul 7, 2008, at
7:10 AM, Tomasz Janeczko wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, these
sources are actually included in what you
> already have on
>>
> your hard disk
>> > under ADK\CMAE\cmaes
>>
>
>> > Best regards,
>> > Tomasz
Janeczko
>> > amibroker.com
>> >> ----- Original
Message -----
>> >> From: Paul Ho
>> >> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
>>
>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 12:22 PM
>> >> Subject:
RE: [amibroker] Code help please... Optimize
> with CMAE
>>
>>
>> >> Go to the guy's site where Tomasz download his
source
> code from,
>> >> download his source code, and
stare at that one instead,
> I think
>> >> its a lot
closer to what you want.
> http://www.bionik.tu-berlin.de/user/niko/cmaes_c.tar.gz
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Jul 7,
2008, at 4:05 AM, Tomasz Janeczko wrote:
>> >>
>>
>> Dennis,
>> >>
>> >> The optimizer
plugin architecture uses backtester. You
> can't go
>>
>> without using backtester.
>> >> Call to pfEvaluateFunc
invokes full-blown backtest for given
>> >> parameter
set.
>> >>
>> >> If you would like to optimize
"general purpose" functions
> without
>> >> using
backtester,
>> >> you would need to take sources provided and
write your
> own plugin
>> >> that won't
>>
>> use backtesting engine at all.
>> >>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> >> Tomasz Janeczko
>>
>> amibroker.com
>> >> ----- Original Message
-----
>> >> From: "Dennis Brown" <see3d@xxx>
>>
>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com>
>>
>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:30 AM
>> >> Subject:
[amibroker] Code help please... Optimize with CMAE
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >>> Hello,
>>
>>>
>> >>> I have been staring at the CMAE DLL
stuff for days and I
> really need
>> >>> some help to
figure out how to use it in a particular way.
>>
>>>
>> >>> I would like to use the optimizer in a
generic sense to
> do the
>> >>> following from AFL
without using the internal
> backtester, meaning
>>
>>> only
>> >>> AFL in indicator mode:
>>
>>>
>> >>> Initialize 2 items:
>>
>>> item 1 is X and has a
default,min,max,step,current,best
> values
>>
>>> 1,1,1000,1,1,1
>> >>> item 2 is Y and has
a default,min,max,step,current,best
> values
>>
>>> 1,1,1000,1,1,1
>> >>>
>>
>>> The objective is to optimize X and Y so that X*Y==100
>>
>>>
>> >>> objective function in AFL:
>>
>>> function Objective()
>> >>> {
>>
>>> return 100 - X*Y;
>> >>> }
>>
>>>
>> >>> The steps I would need to take as I
understand them are:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1.
Initialize the X and Y OptimizeItems by calling
>> >>>
OptimizerInit( with bunch of arguments) --most arguments are
>>
>>> irrelevant to this test.
>> >>>
>>
>>> 2. Start the optimizer engine by calling
>>
>>> pfEvaluateFunc( pContext ) --
>> >>> there
really is no context that I understand for this test.
>>
>>>
>> >>> 3. The DLL calls back for the objective
AFL function
>> >>>
>> >>> 4. It runs step
3 a number of times to find the solution
> of X=Y=10
>>
>>>
>> >>> 5. OptimizerFinalize(same bunch of
arguments as step 1)
>> >>>
>> >>> Of
course I would prefer that step 3 is AFL calling the
> optimizer
>> >>> DLL
>> >>> instead (simple mode),
but I did not think that is how
> the CMAE
>> >>>
works.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyway, if I could
get this simple case to work, I am
> sure I could
>>
>>> figure out how do do much more complicated cases after
>
that on my
>> >>> own.
>> >>>
>>
>>> Of course if there is no way to use the existing DLL
>
without
>> >>> changing
>> >>> it, I
would like to know that also. I should be able to
> make
modest
>> >>> changes to the DLL myself.
>>
>>>
>> >>> Please any hints or AFL code is
appreciated.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best
regards,
>> >>> Dennis
>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
>
> Please
note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
> To
get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT
{at} amibroker.com
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other
news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>