|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
We might be reading different books. In my book, Design, Testing and
optimization of Trading Systems written in 92. He defines PP as the
dollar profit resulting from buying every valley and selling every
peak that occurs in price movement. There isnt any example here. But
I interpret that as the peaks and valleys that are of interest to my
system. I dont see any point in including peaks and valleys that my
system aren't even looking at.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Ludwig <Thomas.Ludwig@xxx>
wrote:
>
> > In an ideal world ie in a PP situation
> > we would have no drawdown and 100% winrate.
> > But I think PP would have the same no of trades, and roughly the
same
> > exposure as the real system.
>
> Paul, I don't think this is correct if you look at how Pardo
describes
> PP.
>
> Regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> > So I'm not sure if I understand what you
> > meant by "the most profitable trading delta/frequency" Would you
like
> > to elaborate?
> > /Paul.
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote:
> > > > Now a few questions to both Thomas and Dennis
> > > > What kind of insights can one obtain with this comparsion? and
> >
> > How do
> >
> > > > you intend to use it? And would you mind post some of your
> >
> > findings?
> >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Paul.
> > >
> > > Paul,
> > >
> > > The first insights are just the normal ones around the most
> >
> > profitable
> >
> > > trading delta/frequency. I also use this as the denominator to
> > > determine the relative efficiency of a system relative to what
the
> > > market is offering, and to determine the shifting nature of the
> >
> > market
> >
> > > over time. I use it with broad market indexes, not individual
> > > issues. I am still experimenting with it to discover new ways
to
> >
> > use
> >
> > > this information.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Dennis
> > >
> > > On May 16, 2008, at 11:20 PM, Paul Ho wrote:
> > > > Thomas
> > > > I think the model efficency can be calculated in the CBT
without
> > > > directly getting PP, This can be done by obtaining the
> > > > Theoretical buy point (tbp) around the actual buy point, and
> > > > obtaining tsp
> >
> > around
> >
> > > > the sell point.
> > > > The tbp can happen either before or just after the buy point.
> > > > first look at the before scenario, you can either use trough
or
> >
> > LLV
> >
> > > > function. the problem with the trough function is that the low
> > > > obtained from Trough() could be quite far away. Lets say we
use
> >
> > LLV
> >
> > > > (L, pds) where pds is half the average bars held obtained
> > > > directly from CBT metrics
> > > > so tbp_before = LLV(L, bars/2)
> > > > To find tbp_after we can use the mae metrics from backtest
> >
> > directly
> >
> > > > tbp_after = (1 + mae)*buyprice;
> > > > tbp = min(tbp_before, tbp_after);
> > > > The cbt code for tbp could be as follows:
> > > > ....
> > > > bo = GetBacktesterObject();
> > > > bo.Backtest();
> > > > st.bo.GetPerformanceStats(0);
> > > > bars = st.GetValue("AllavgBarsHeld");
> > > > me = 0; //stores the sum of model eff per trade
> > > > for( trade = bo.GetFirstTrade(); trade; trade =
bo.GetNextTrade
> >
> > () )
> >
> > > > {
> > > > sym = trade.Symbol;
> > > > mae = trade.GetMAE();
> > > > lp = foregin(sym, "L");
> > > > tbp_before = lastvalue(valuewhen(datetime()==
> >
> > trade.EntryDateTime,
> >
> > > > LLV(lp,bars/2)));
> > > > tbp_after = (1+mae)*trade.EntryPrice;
> > > > tbp = min(tbp_before, tbp_after);
> > > > ........
> > > > tsp = max(tsp_before, tsp_after);
> > > > theoreticProfitratio = tsp/tbp;
> > > > realprofitratio = trade.ExitPrice/trade.EntryPrice;
> > > > me += realprofitratio/theoreticProfitratio;
> > > > }
> > > > .... // do the same with open position
> > > > mean_me = me/st.GetValue("AllQty");
> > > > There are a number of variations depending on your perference
> > > > 1. You can use trough and peak instead of LLV and HHV
> > > > 2. instead of average ME, you can go for accumulated ME by
> >
> > dividing
> >
> > > > real profit / theoretical profit. Not sure the figure would be
> > > > too small to make a lot of sense.
> > > > 3. you can use geometric average instead of arithmetic average
> > > >
> > > > Now a few questions to both Thomas and Dennis
> > > > What kind of insights can one obtain with this comparsion? and
> >
> > How do
> >
> > > > you intend to use it? And would you mind post some of your
> >
> > findings?
> >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Paul.
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote:
> > > >> Thomas,
> > > >>
> > > >> That is what I do. Though I also add all the trading
overhead
> > > >> as
> > > >
> > > > if
> > > >
> > > >> it were real trades, then adjust the % change to the maximum
> >
> > total
> >
> > > >> profit which gives you a lot more insights.
> > > >>
> > > >> BR,
> > > >> Dennis
> > > >>
> > > >> On May 16, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Thomas Ludwig wrote:
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Rober Pardo suggests in his book "The Evaluation and
> >
> > Optimization
> >
> > > > of
> > > >
> > > >>> Trading Strategies" the calculation of "Perfect Profit" (PP)
> > > >
> > > > which "is
> > > >
> > > >>> the sum total of all of the potential profit that could be
> > > >
> > > > realized by
> > > >
> > > >>> buying every bottom and selling every top". By comparing Net
> > > >
> > > > Profit of
> > > >
> > > >>> your trading system with PP you can calculate the "Model
> > > >
> > > > Efficiency"
> > > >
> > > >>> (ME).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I think PP can be easily calculated as a stand-alone code by
> > > >>> applying a,
> > > >>> say, 1% Zigzag. But how can it be done if I want to add ME
as
> > > >>> an additional metric in the Custom Backtester? The Equity()
> >
> > function
> >
> > > > is
> > > >
> > > >>> used for your trading system and cannot be used for the
Zigzag
> > > >
> > > > system
> > > >
> > > >>> at the same time in order to compare both, IMHO. So the only
> > > >>> solution I
> > > >>> can think of is to loop through all Zigzag signals and
> > > >>> calculate
> > > >
> > > > the
> > > >
> > > >>> profit programmatically. Or am I overlooking something?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Pardo also suggests to calculate the Remaining Percentage of
> > > >
> > > > Degrees
> > > >
> > > >>> of
> > > >>> Freedom (through Used Dgrees of Freedom and Original
Degrees of
> > > >>> Freedom). Any idea if and how they can be counted in AFL?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thomas
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ------------------------------------
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please note that this group is for discussion between users
> >
> > only.
> >
> > > >>> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail
directly to
> > > >>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
> >
> > DEVLOG:
> > > >>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For other support material please check also:
> > > >>> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
> > > >
> > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly
to
> > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > >
> > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
DEVLOG:
> > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > >
> > > > For other support material please check also:
> > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> >
> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > For other support material please check also:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|