[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: Jake Bernstein Momentum formula



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

kailash pareek wrote:
>
> Well, i love arguments. because it gives us good things.
>
>  
>
> Well, nothing is for sure here. you see u optimized 10 years data and 
> there was only 3 conse.. looser trade. Now think u start trading and 
> those three trades r ur 1st 3 trades. u loose n lost confidence.
>
>  
>
> So, nothing is for sure.
>
>  
>
> just a penny
>
>  
>
> johnny
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: wavemechanic <timesarrow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 6:15:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Jake Bernstein Momentum formula
>
> *We all deal with correlation not causation.*
> **** 
> *Bill*
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Yuki Taga <mailto:yukitaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     *To:* wavemechanic <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     *Sent:* Friday, May 09, 2008 8:28 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [amibroker] Re: Jake Bernstein Momentum formula
>
>     Fi-Fi-Fi-Fibonacci?  Truly the astrology of TA, but with even less
>     logic.
>
>     Yuki
>
>     Friday, May 9, 2008, 8:57:30 PM, you wrote:
>
>     w> I don't buy that (i.e., "both right, but not at the same time").
>     w> When used properly price levels (e.g., S&R, Fibonacci, Gann, etc.)
>     w> and momentum provide distinctly different information and are not
>     w> duplicative.  As a result, there is no reason not to use them
>     w> together and I for one always do.
>
>     w> Bill
>     w>   ----- Original Message -----
>     w>   From: brian_z111
>     w>   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
>     <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     w>   Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 7:54 PM
>     w>   Subject: [amibroker] Re: Jake Bernstein Momentum formula
>
>
>     w>   As Yuki said, "they are both right, but not at the same time".
>
>     w>   The company, and dicussion, around the coffee table is good
>     but as
>     w>   Ralph Vince said "trading is not an intellectual exercise, it
>     is more
>     w>   like a street fight".
>
>     w>   Forget right or wrong - get in there and beat the heck out of
>     every
>     w>   opponent (mean reversion, trend trading, Hurst, S/R) what
>     ever comes
>     w>   along.
>
>     w>   (that means work them over with backtesting - what is the
>     most you
>     w>   can squeeze out of that style e.g. a reversion to mean trade
>     - can
>     w>   you do better if you change it up a bit - when you reach
>     exhaustion
>     w>   point with that trade then you know exactly what its limits
>     are - be
>     w>   honest with yourself - have you really squeezed all of the
>     juice out
>     w>   of that style - after a while you start to see that sometimes
>     the
>     w>   same opponent returns in another outfit and you can't be
>     bothered
>     w>   beating up on the same old foe over and over).
>
>     w>   When they are all defeated keep your eyes peeled and your nerves
>     w>   steeled for any new challengers who are coming along and give
>     them a
>     w>   hiding too.
>
>     w>   P.S. anyone can see my trading biases but they can also see I am
>     w>   thinking about, and paying respect to, trading styles that
>     don't come
>     w>   naturally to me.
>
>     w>   brian_z
>
>
>     w>   --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
>     <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Louis Préfontaine"
>     w>   <rockprog80@x ..> wrote:
>     w>   >
>     w>   > Thanks Brian. Indeed, that looks like prehistoric stuff...
>     w>   >
>     w>   > BTW, what is your opinion about the S/R breakout vs
>     reversion to
>     w>   mean
>     w>   > debate?
>     w>   >
>     w>   > Thanks,
>     w>   >
>     w>   > Louis
>     w>   >
>     w>   > 2008/5/8 brian_z111 <brian_z111@x ..>:
>     w>   >
>     w>   > >   If your trading system rules are based on things like
>     "buy when
>     w>   the
>     w>   > > short term moving ave crosses the long term moving ave".
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > The MA is looking back so many periods to make its
>     calculation
>     w>   e.g. MA
>     w>   > > (C,15) is looking back 15 periods.
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > If you test a range of MA periods, to select your best MA
>     w>   crossover
>     w>   > > system, then you are optimising the lookback period (at
>     least
>     w>   that is
>     w>   > > what I mean).
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > brian_z
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
>     <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <amibroker%
>     w>   40yahoogroups. com>, "Louis
>     w>   > > Préfontaine"
>     w>   > > <rockprog80@> wrote:
>     w>   > > >
>     w>   > > > Hi Brian and everyone,
>     w>   > > >
>     w>   > > > What exactly do you mean by "optimisation of lookback
>     period"?
>     w>   > > >
>     w>   > > > I had a lot of fun reading this thread. I wonder what
>     is better:
>     w>   > > > support/resistance breakout or reversion to mean.
>     Worked with
>     w>   > > both; don't
>     w>   > > > know yet what works better. I've seen people been sure
>     of their
>     w>   > > opinions,
>     w>   > > > but I'd like to read some arguments...
>     w>   > > >
>     w>   > > > Louis
>     w>   > > >
>     w>   > > > 2008/5/8 brian_z111 <brian_z111@>:
>     w>   > > >
>     w>   > > > > It's just an opinion, but it is based on observation.
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > > > I'm referring to systems designed by optimising lookback
>     w>   periods.
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > > > I'm happy to be proved wrong ...so you are saying we can
>     w>   achieve
>     w>   > > > > better than 30-40%PA, on long term average (through
>     various
>     w>   market
>     w>   > > > > cycles) using 'optimisation of lookback period'
>     techniques?
>     w>   (EOD,
>     w>   > > no
>     w>   > > > > leveraging).
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > > > brian_z
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
>     <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <amibroker%
>     w>   40yahoogroups. com><amibroker%
>     w>   > > 40yahoogroups. com>,
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > > > "bilbo0211" <bilbod@> wrote:
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > "I will stick to my prediction that around 30%PA EOD
>     w>   trading is
>     w>   > > a
>     w>   > > > > > limit for indicators that use lookback periods and
>     that to
>     w>   > > achieve
>     w>   > > > > > more than this requires a different approach (as I
>     say you
>     w>   are
>     w>   > > both
>     w>   > > > > > correct except I believe that Steve is talking
>     about >30%PA
>     w>   > > > > returns)."
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > Is this just your opinion or do you have something that
>     w>   > > approaches
>     w>   > > > > > 'scientific proof' of this allegation?
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > In "The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing"
>     by J M
>     w>   Hurst,
>     w>   > > the
>     w>   > > > > > author claims the theoretical maximum annual ROI
>     for stock
>     w>   > > trading
>     w>   > > > > is
>     w>   > > > > > 2400%. ROI is directly related to the holding
>     period for
>     w>   each
>     w>   > > trade
>     w>   > > > > > and being fully invested at all times (the 'Magic'
>     is in the
>     w>   > > power
>     w>   > > > > of
>     w>   > > > > > compounding) .
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > Hurst recorded the results of a 6 week real time
>     trading
>     w>   > > experiment
>     w>   > > > > in
>     w>   > > > > > which his performance trading high beta stocks
>     approached
>     w>   his
>     w>   > > > > > theoretical maximum annual ROI.
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > Hurst waited until the dominant cycles in his trading
>     w>   instrument
>     w>   > > > > were
>     w>   > > > > > in alignment before trading (this is also called
>     multiple
>     w>   time
>     w>   > > frame
>     w>   > > > > > or multiple fractal alignment). He primarily used
>     daily and
>     w>   > > weekly
>     w>   > > > > charts.
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > The theoretical maximum ROI is actually much higher
>     than
>     w>   2400%
>     w>   > > if
>     w>   > > > > you
>     w>   > > > > > use intraday charts and leveraged trading instruments.
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > If you look in the Amibroker Trading System Yahoo
>     group, you
>     w>   > > will
>     w>   > > > > find
>     w>   > > > > > a poll of results of people's mechanical trading
>     systems.
>     w>   IIRC,
>     w>   > > the
>     w>   > > > > > best ones listed returned over 400% per year.
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > Bill
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
>     <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <amibroker%
>     w>   40yahoogroups. com><amibroker%
>     w>   > > 40yahoogroups. com>,
>     w>   > > > > "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > 20 - (- 9.3_ == approx delta 30% PA in my books.
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > Thanks Yuki for confirming this.
>     w>   > > > > > > Now I don't have to post a 30% system (as I promised
>     w>   Louis) to
>     w>   > > > > prove
>     w>   > > > > > > my benchmark is correct.
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > Actually I agree with both you and Steve (the real
>     w>   problem is
>     w>   > > > > > > semantics since IMO close analysis would show
>     that most
>     w>   of us
>     w>   > > are
>     w>   > > > > > > moementum traders and also that most of us are
>     using a
>     w>   kind of
>     w>   > > > > S/R in
>     w>   > > > > > > some way - the difference is how we perceive and
>     define
>     w>   these
>     w>   > > > > things).
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > I will stick to my prediction that around 30%PA EOD
>     w>   trading
>     w>   > > is a
>     w>   > > > > > > limit for indicators that use lookback periods
>     and that to
>     w>   > > > > achieve
>     w>   > > > > > > more than this requires a different approach (as
>     I say
>     w>   you are
>     w>   > > > > both
>     w>   > > > > > > correct except I believe that Steve is talking
>     about >30%
>     w>   PA
>     w>   > > > > returns).
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > (Steve - care to confirm?)
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > brian_z
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com
>     <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <amibroker%
>     w>   40yahoogroups. com><amibroker%
>     w>   > > 40yahoogroups. com>, Yuki
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > > > Taga <yukitaga@> wrote:
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > Gee, then I guess I should give back my ~20
>     percent a
>     w>   year
>     w>   > > that
>     w>   > > > > is
>     w>   > > > > > > > largely based on short-term momentum swings,
>     yes? (I'm
>     w>   > > sitting
>     w>   > > > > plus
>     w>   > > > > > > > 13 percent YTD this year already, as of yesterday,
>     w>   versus -
>     w>   > > 9.3
>     w>   > > > > > > > percent for my Nikkei 225 benchmark.)
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > You do have to be agile however. And you cannot
>     overstay
>     w>   > > your
>     w>   > > > > > > > welcome. But the money is there for momentum
>     systems if
>     w>   > > > > designed
>     w>   > > > > > > > and tested properly.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > "Support" exists, but everyone knows where it is.
>     w>   Exactly
>     w>   > > > > where it
>     w>   > > > > > > > is. And somebody (I'll leave it to you to guess
>     who) is
>     w>   > > going
>     w>   > > > > to
>     w>   > > > > > > > ring the bell and tell you that (resistance
>     failed) or
>     w>   > > (support
>     w>   > > > > > > > failed). What are you going to do, then? You're
>     going to
>     w>   > > stop
>     w>   > > > > > > > yourself out of course. With a loser.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > Which is likely to be more profitable, and for
>     a longer
>     w>   > > period
>     w>   > > > > of
>     w>   > > > > > > > time? Systems that compel you to do the
>     psychologically
>     w>   > > > > difficult,
>     w>   > > > > > > > or systems that suggest that you do the patently
>     w>   obvious?
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > Is there anyone beyond 7th grade that doesn't
>     know where
>     w>   > > > > support and
>     w>   > > > > > > > resistance is? Are there great systems that
>     rely on
>     w>   widely
>     w>   > > > > known
>     w>   > > > > > > > community knowledge?
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > Look for a system that has good metrics, but a
>     system
>     w>   that
>     w>   > > also
>     w>   > > > > > > > suggests that what you need to do will be
>     w>   psychologically
>     w>   > > > > difficult
>     w>   > > > > > > > for you to do, in spite of having back-tested
>     results
>     w>   > > > > indicating
>     w>   > > > > > > that
>     w>   > > > > > > > you are foolish if you *don't* do it. Then you
>     are good
>     w>   to
>     w>   > > go,
>     w>   > > > > as
>     w>   > > > > > > > they say. Good to go as long as you do it, of
>     course.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > If your system is easy to follow (by that, I
>     mean that
>     w>   it's
>     w>   > > > > > > > psychologically easy for you to make the
>     trades), it's
>     w>   > > probably
>     w>   > > > > a
>     w>   > > > > > > > loser. And vice-versa. The best systems have good
>     w>   metrics,
>     w>   > > yet
>     w>   > > > > > > > despite that they almost defy the trader
>     w>   (psychologically)
>     w>   > > to
>     w>   > > > > make
>     w>   > > > > > > > the trades. There is no free lunch.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > Yuki
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > Thursday, May 8, 2008, 11:50:01 AM, you wrote:
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> Anthony,
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> Do yourself a big favor. Don't waste your
>     precious
>     w>   time
>     w>   > > on
>     w>   > > > > this
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> earth with this kind of drivel. Chasing
>     price with
>     w>   > > > > momentum
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> indicators is not going to get you where you
>     want to
>     w>   be.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> Coming up with a support/resistance system
>     is all you
>     w>   > > need
>     w>   > > > > to
>     w>   > > > > > > make
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> whatever you want from the markets.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> I've seen hundreds of traders get wiped out
>     trying
>     w>   to go
>     w>   > > on
>     w>   > > > > the
>     w>   > > > > > > path
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> you're following and all of the successful
>     traders
>     w>   I've
>     w>   > > been
>     w>   > > > > > > around
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> in the e-mini futures have used S/R as the
>     w>   foundation of
>     w>   > > > > their
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> trading methodology.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> And, above all, embrace your emotions in
>     trading
>     w>   because
>     w>   > > > > they
>     w>   > > > > > > teach
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> you what you should and shouldn't do going
>     forward.
>     w>   > > > > Computers
>     w>   > > > > > > learn
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> nothing while you learn from every win and
>     loss you
>     w>   make.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> Finding an edge in trading is easy. It's
>     only hard if
>     w>   > > > > you're
>     w>   > > > > > > using a
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> computer to find a needle in a haystack
>     because you
>     w>   > > didn't
>     w>   > > > > make
>     w>   > > > > > > a
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> good enough investment in real-time
>     observations of
>     w>   the
>     w>   > > > > markets
>     w>   > > > > > > while
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> researching an edge you'd like to trade..
>     That makes
>     w>   all
>     w>   > > > > the
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> difference in the world for knowing what
>     works and
>     w>   what
>     w>   > > > > doesn't.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> You'll come up with 10 edges to trade if you
>     put the
>     w>   > > time in
>     w>   > > > > to
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> experience a live market on a regular basis
>     without
>     w>   > > trying
>     w>   > > > > so
>     w>   > > > > > > hard.
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> It will bring out your imagination and
>     creativity to
>     w>   find
>     w>   > > > > what
>     w>   > > > > > > you're
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> looking for.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> I wish someone had told me that 4.5 years
>     ago when I
>     w>   > > started
>     w>   > > > > > > trading
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> the ER2 e-mini. It would have saved me a lot
>     of time
>     w>   > > > > chasing
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> nonsense.
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx ps.com<amibroker%
>     <mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%3Camibroker%>
>     w>   40yahoogroups. com><amibroker%
>     w>   > > 40yahoogroups. com>,
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > > > "ihsaham" <ihsaham@> wrote:
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Hai Tomasz,
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> This is simple Jake Bernstein Momentum
>     Formula for
>     w>   chart
>     w>   > > and
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> scanner.
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Please help me give arrow buy and sell. Buy
>     arrow is
>     w>   > > Green
>     w>   > > > > > > colour
>     w>   > > > > > > > s> and
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Sell Arrow is Red Colour.
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> I really appreciate and thanks for you in
>     advance.
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Best Regards,
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Anthony Idic
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> _SECTION_BEGIN( " $ Momentum ");
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> /* Bernstein Momentum Indicator */
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> /* Set Scaling to Automatic, Show dates On,
>     Percent
>     w>   On,
>     w>   > > > > Middle
>     w>   > > > > > > On */
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Title = "Bernstein MOM Close - Ref(Close,-7) ";
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> GraphXSpace = 5;
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Graph0 = MA(Close - Ref(Close,-7) ,1);
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Graph0Style = 5;
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Graph0Color = 29;
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Graph1 = MA(Graph0,5) ;
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Graph1Style = 1;
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Graph1Color = 32;
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> DaysAgo =Optimize("DaysAgo" ,-28,-40, -16,4);
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Fast = Optimize("Fast" , 1, 1,5,1);
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Slow = Optimize("Slow" ,28,16,40, 4);
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> /* Note: It is merely a coincidence that
>     DaysAgo and
>     w>   Slow
>     w>   > > > > use
>     w>   > > > > > > the
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> same parameter set. */
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Buy = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo)
>     ,Fast),
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo) ,Slow) );
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Sell = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo)
>     ,Slow),
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo) ,Fast) );
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Short = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo)
>     ,Slow),
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo) ,Fast) );
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> Cover = Cross( MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo)
>     ,Fast),
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> MA(Close - Ref(Close,DaysAgo) ,Slow) );
>     w>   > > > > > > > >> _SECTION_END( );
>     w>   > > > > > > > >>
>     w>   > > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > > >
>     w>   > > > > >
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > > >
>     w>   > > >
>     w>   > >
>     w>   > > 
>     w>   > >
>     w>   >
>
>
>
>     w>   ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
>     w>   Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
>     w>   To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
>     w>   SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com <http://amibroker.com/>
>
>     w>   For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>     w>   http://www.amibroke r.com/devlog/
>     <http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/>
>
>     w>   For other support material please check also:
>     w>   http://www.amibroke r.com/support. html
>     <http://www.amibroker.com/support.html>
>     w>   Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>     w>   --
>     w>   No virus found in this incoming message.
>     w>   Checked by AVG.
>     w>   Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.11/1422 - Release
>     Date: 5/8/2008 5:24 PM
>
>
>      
>
>
>
>     ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
>     Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
>     To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
>     SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com <http://amibroker.com/>
>
>     For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>     http://www.amibroke r.com/devlog/ <http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/>
>
>     For other support material please check also:
>     http://www.amibroke r.com/support. html
>     <http://www.amibroker.com/support.html>
>     Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>         (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>         mailto:amibroker- fullfeatured@ yahoogroups. com
>     <mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     No virus found in this incoming message.
>     Checked by AVG.
>     Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.11/1422 - Release Date:
>     5/8/2008 5:24 PM
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try 
> it now. 
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ%20> 
>
> 
> Messages in this topic 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/123543;_ylc=X3oDMTM4dmF0ajM1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BG1zZ0lkAzEyMzY1OARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyMTAzMzg3MDAEdHBjSWQDMTIzNTQz> 
> (28) Reply (via web post) 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJyajdua25pBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BG1zZ0lkAzEyMzY1OARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNycGx5BHN0aW1lAzEyMTAzMzg3MDA-?act=reply&messageNum=123658> 
> | Start a new topic 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNGV2bG4wBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTIxMDMzODcwMA--> 
>
> Messages 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJldGlqanExBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA21zZ3MEc3RpbWUDMTIxMDMzODY4Ng--> 
> | Files 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcHNscGlnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2ZpbGVzBHN0aW1lAzEyMTAzMzg2ODY-> 
> | Photos 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/photos;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYnYwOG1wBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Bob3QEc3RpbWUDMTIxMDMzODY4Ng--> 
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> Yahoo! Groups 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkbWFka21hBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMjEwMzM4NzAw> 
>
> Change settings via the Web 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJmM2pzZGRjBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3N0bmdzBHN0aW1lAzEyMTAzMzg3MDA-> 
> (Yahoo! ID required)
> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest 
> <mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Email%20Delivery:%20Digest> 
> | Switch format to Traditional 
> <mailto:amibroker-traditional@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Change%20Delivery%20Format:%20Traditional> 
>
> Visit Your Group 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker;_ylc=X3oDMTJkNDlxbm9wBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2hwZgRzdGltZQMxMjEwMzM4NzAw> 
> | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | 
> Unsubscribe <mailto:amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=>
> Recent Activity
>
>    *
>        42
>       New Members
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYTE2ZDdpBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEyMTAzMzg2ODY->
>    *
>        2
>       New Files
>       <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files;_ylc=X3oDMTJnYW4zdmVzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZmaWxlcwRzdGltZQMxMjEwMzM4Njg2>
>
> Visit Your Group 
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbmoxcW81BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEwMTA2OTIEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1NjMyMTk4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTIxMDMzODY4Ng--> 
>
> Yahoo! News
>
> Fashion News 
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13ohca224/M=493064.12016309.12445701.8674578/D=groups/S=1705632198:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1210345904/L=/B=xRsfCELaX98-/J=1210338704080980/A=3848621/R=0/SIG=12u6o6g3h/*http://news.yahoo.com/i/1597;_ylt=A9FJqa5Gxa5E2jgAYQKVEhkF;_ylu=X3oDMTA2MnU4czRtBHNlYwNzbg-->
>
> What's the word on
>
> fashion and style?
>
> Yahoo! Finance
>
> It's Now Personal 
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13ojv19e9/M=493064.12016257.12445664.8674578/D=groups/S=1705632198:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1210345904/L=/B=xhsfCELaX98-/J=1210338704080980/A=4507179/R=0/SIG=12de4rskk/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=50284/*http://finance.yahoo.com/personal-finance>
>
> Guides, news,
>
> advice & more.
>
> Need traffic?
>
> Drive customers 
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13om1pgpr/M=493064.12016308.12445700.8674578/D=groups/S=1705632198:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1210345904/L=/B=xxsfCELaX98-/J=1210338704080980/A=3848644/R=0/SIG=131l83flq/*http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/srchv2.php?o=US2006&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=Groups5&s=Y&s2=&s3=&b=50>
>
> With search ads
>
> on Yahoo!
>
> .
>
> _

> _,
 TEch_._,___
       Thech Analysis is more art than science.( Can you  optimize just 
art?)
       S&R, Fibonacci, Gann, etc.(including support and resistance )
        not a science or scientific model (it is pseudoscience )!!!
       Not a good scientific model for price movement.( One example  of  
successful model
       is the  Black-Scoles model  for  Options, at least first step) .
     

------------------------------------

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/