|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Gerry,
> Is it possible that there was a typo in the K-ratio correction?
> Perhaps Mr Kestner has made another change?
> I don't have his books or articles, i just gave up on the k-ratio
> because i didn't think it was telling me anything useful.
>
> I would be interested if you or anyone else have run some examples
> where K-ratio is high and exposure is high, and what are the other
> backtest numbers.
I have the latest version of his book and what you have posted is
correct.
I have uploaded a k-ratio.xls spreadsheet to the file section of this
forum (there is an old version there under my old name - brian.z123 -
not that one - the new one by brian_z111
It is a dymamic file with a 20 datapoint example.
Instructions are included but it is self-explanatory anyway.
It should help sort it out a bit.
brian_z
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "gerryjoz" <geraldj@xxx> wrote:
>
> Grant,
> in your post you asked me to elaborate on why i thought the K-ratio
> was a waste of space and RRR was simpler/better. What i have found
is
> that k-ratio is generally lower the higher the exposure for the same
> or similar trading systems in back test. If you want a high k-ratio,
> according to the AB calc, don't buy or sell!
> Here is a contrived (curve-fit) example (run on real data) over a
few
> years
> CAR 33%
> Profit factor 7
> CAR/MDD 2.8
> Max Sys DD % 11.5%
> RRR 2.15
> K-ratio .096
> exposure 49%
> #trades 170
>
> the K-ratio definitio in AB help is
> "
> K-Ratio - Detects inconsistency in returns. Should be 1.0 or more.
The
> higher K ratio is the more consistent return you may expect from
the
> system. Linear regression slope of equity line multiplied by square
> root of sum of squared deviations of bar number divided by standard
> error of equity line multiplied by square root of number of bars.
More
> information: Stocks & Commodities V14:3 (115-118): Measuring System
> Performance by Lars N. Kestner
> "
> personally i prefer measures which are more easily comprehended.
This
> one isn't, even tho 40 years ago i did do maths & stats at uni.
> In any case, back in May 2004 Tomasz changed the calc...
> ======>
>
> K-ratio calculation changed. following the change made by its
creator,
> Mr. Lars Kestner.
>
> Quoting from the book "Quantitative Trading Strategies" from 2003 by
> Lars Kestner:
>
> [ - - - ]
> " The K-ratio is a unitless measure of performance that can be
> compared across markets and time periods. [ - - - ] Traders should
> search for strategies yielding K-ratios greater than +0.50.
Together,
> the Sharpe ratio and K-ratio are the most important
> measures when evaluating trading strategy performance. Note: When I
> created the K-ratio in 1996, I thought I had created a
> robust measure to evaluate performance. In mid-2000, trader Bob
Fuchs
> brought a small error to my attention regarding the
> scaling of the K-ratio. He was correct in his critique and I have
> corrected the error in this text. Publications prior to 2002 will
> show a different formula for the K-ratio. The updated formula in
this
> book is correct."
>
> Mr Lars Kestner has corrected his formula based on this critique:
> K-ratio = slope / ( sterr * per )
>
> slope: Linear regression slope of equity line
> sterr: Standard error of slope
> per: Number of periods in the performance test
>
> Special thanks to Jeremy Berkovits who brought that to my attention.
>
> <======
> There was quite a bit of discussion at the time.
> I understand RRR intuitively, and when i look at the other ratios i
> can see why one is higher or lower (with a bit of checking).
>
> Is it possible that there was a typo in the K-ratio correction?
> Perhaps Mr Kestner has made another change?
> I don't have his books or articles, i just gave up on the k-ratio
> because i didn't think it was telling me anything useful.
>
> I would be interested if you or anyone else have run some examples
> where K-ratio is high and exposure is high, and what are the other
> backtest numbers.
>
> regards
> Gerry
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|