[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] video tutorials



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Brian,

did you make any videos? I may have missed them...

herman

--------------------------------------------------
From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 6:13 PM
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [amibroker] Re: no amibroker book?

> Also - Tomasz trumped me, as usual, because he has listened to all of 
> our comments (we discussed all of this stuff in depth in the UKB 
> committee meetings as well as here) and his reponse was to start 
> producing videos.
> 
> His perception is spot on in that videos pack the most 'bang for the 
> buck' when it comes to training - maybe I should film more and write 
> less - at least they are easier to maintain into the future (dump the 
> old one and spend 15 minutes making a new one).
> 
> Keep up the good work Tomasz,
> 
> brian_z
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Good day Ed,
>> 
>> A very interesting background, and comments, especially since you 
>> don't post all that often.
>> 
>> I spent 25 years in mining and referenced semi-trailer loads of 
> tech 
>> manuals in that time, including manuals for gas analyzers. They 
> were 
>> full of legal disclaimers and pre-amble and the only sections that 
>> were ever read, more than once, if at all, were the drawings and 
> the 
>> procedures - tech guys/engineers went straight to the drawings and 
>> specs (mud maps) and operators went straight to the 'how to get it 
>> going' procedures.
>> 
>> In fact more often than not the mudmups and the 20 pages of 
>> procedures in the 1000 page manual were reprinted, bound and 
>> circulated and the book itself sat in the cupboard untouched.
>> 
>> (Maybe I even read one of yours).
>> 
>> 99% of operators never ever even picked up the manual.
>> They relied on the 1% to write the 20 page version.
>> 
>> People who do (the minority) are always vociferously criticized by 
>> those who don't (usually in inverse proportions).
>> 
>> I think the motivation of AB owners is a lot higher than people in 
>> the workplace though (on average).
>> 
>> I do empathise with Tomasz though - he must get sick of us 
> constantly 
>> dissecting his every move (sometimes people get a bit personal too 
>> which I think is very harmful). Also manuals are a thankless task 
>> because as soon as you finish them they are 'out of date'.
>> 
>> Having written a couple of posts for the UKB I know how hard it is 
> to 
>> write - people have no idea of the work I put into them and how I 
>> agonize over the prose and the grammar (where will I put that 
> comma?)
>> 
>> So in case I didn't make it clear before the only suggestion I am 
>> making to Tomasz is re the manual - people do expect AB to be 
>> accountable for the manual - I cringe when I go to it and see 
>> obsolete content that has been there for more than one update (Yes -
> 
>> TOC/Indexes/Searchability are crucial).
>> 
>> However, while I talk about other 'training issues' I don't expect 
>> anything outside of the manual and I don't expect Tomasz to anyting 
>> else in that area (nice if he can but not realistic).
>> 
>> The community support is excellent but it will never be perfect or 
>> perfectly organized and presented (unless we all do what Howard 
> does 
>> and sit down and write a formal presentation).
>> 
>> I have tried to do walk through/plenty of pictures/examples etc at 
>> the UKB (that is what the UKB is for) don't know if I succeeded but 
>> there just isn't enough hours.
>> 
>> So will I be seeing some posts from you at the UKB then?
>> 
>> While I am here I would like to redress one misconception.
>> 
>> I thought people were unfair, and lacked an understanding of 
> Tomasz, 
>> when they said they thought he couldn't write a good manual.
>> 
>> IMO Tomasz would make a very good author, and not only for 
> technical 
>> manuals. His grammar is better than mine and when he wants to he 
> can 
>> turn out a nice piece of prose (we have to remember English isn't 
> his 
>> first language - how would we go writing in Polish?). He is also a 
>> creative person (an artist) and if he wanted to let loose on a book 
> I 
>> am sure he could do a good job.
>> 
>> The only reason IMO that the manual is lagging the program is 
> because 
>> Tomasz doesn't have the time and also it is not as much fun as 
>> programming and he would rather be doing that (can't blame him for 
>> that).
>> 
>> Re books:
>> 
>> I always think that it is a great privilige, and I can't believe 
> how 
>> lucky I am, to be able to prop 20 years of 
> Howards/Kaufmans/Aronsons 
>> life, in condensed form, beside my bed and read them over and over 
>> until their experience blends with mine.
>> 
>> Thanks for your comments - really enjoyed them.
>> 
>> brian_z
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ed Hoopes" <reefbreak_sd@> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have been the author of about a dozen technical manuals for
>> > industrial gas analyzers that used embedded computers/software to 
>> run
>> > the instruments.  Several were about 200 pages long.
>> > 
>> > As such, I have heard all of the criticisms about inadequate 
>> manuals.
>> > Too long, too short, too detailed, over simplified, too 
> theoretical 
>> etc.
>> > 
>> > Here is my perspective:
>> > 1. A "Quick Start" guide is good - patterned after many modern
>> > electronic devices we buy today - tabloid size or larger - 
>> everything
>> > on one page - lots of diagrams - fewer words - in the book as a
>> > tear-out section.
>> > 2. As a former 2nd year algebra teacher (before I got into 
>> instrument
>> > design) - I think large numbers of errors are due to not knowing 
> the
>> > rules of algebra as implemented in software.  The users will take
>> > their algebra errors and blame it on the software.
>> > 3. Maybe something on 'structured walk thru' techniques (or what 
>> ever
>> > is popular now)  -  to get users to fully think through everything
>> > they are trying to code for.
>> > 2. Example code of some relatively simple analysis - Years ago IBM
>> > taught SQL(I think) using 'query by example', so maybe a chapter 
> on
>> > 'Coding *.afl by example'
>> > 4. Finally, EACH USER of your book will have different 
>> expectations -
>> > you will not be able to make everyone happy, so in publishing your
>> > guide, expect a steady stream of 'Don't buy Howard's book  -  It
>> > didn't help me' kinds of comments.
>> > 
>> > BTW  -  I bought QTS (2 copies - I gave one away) - I liked it.
>> > 
>> > Ed Hoopes
>> > 
>> > PS 
>> > Spending lots of time on the ToC and Index reduces the complaints,
>> > especially if you can direct them to that area to locate their 
>> answer.
>> >  After a few complaints, they will start to look there rather 
> than 
>> post.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "chorlton_c_hardy"
>> > <chorlton-c-hardy@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 
>> > > Hello Howard,
>> > > 
>> > > As a reader of your last book, I for one, look forward to 
> reading 
>> it.
>> > > 
>> > > I have read your last book a number of times now and still keep 
>> > > learning new elements!!!  Maybe I'm just a slow learner 
> though :-/
>> > > 
>> > > Also, as a newbie to Amibroker & its langauge I'm very 
> surprised 
>> no 
>> > > one has considered writing one before, given the popularity of 
>> this 
>> > > excellent piece of software, so its good to hear that one is 
> now 
>> in 
>> > > the pipeline.....
>> > > 
>> > > All the best,
>> > > 
>> > > Chorlton
>> > > 
>> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Howard B" <howardbandy@> 
> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi Christopher --
>> > > > 
>> > > > Since the book is so closely associated with AmiBroker, I'll 
>> use the
>> > > > AmiBroker forum groups to announce the book.
>> > > > 
>> > > > SO far, there are plans for only a printed version.  But that 
>> might 
>> > > change.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Howard
>> > > > 
>> > > > On Feb 11, 2008 4:07 AM, Christopher <chrisjeal@> wrote:
>> > > > 
>> > > > >   Hi Howard,
>> > > > > I would be interested in a book on how to use Amibroker 
>> > > correctly, how
>> > > > > will you let people know when you have published the book?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Have you thought of selling it as a pdf something like on 
>> > > clickbank?
>> > > > > As you will have no costs up front and will sell as many as 
>> > > wanted no
>> > > > > more and no less - also you could offer updated pages as 
>> needed.
>> > > > > Just an Idea.
>> > > > > Yours
>> > > > > Chris
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amibroker%
>> > > 40yahoogroups.com>, "Howard B"
>> > > > > <howardbandy@> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Greetings all --
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > What a nice surprise, it looks like there is a new price 
>> point. 
>> > > I
>> > > > > did not
>> > > > > > think the market would bear so much. (Grin)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > " I WILL GET IT but I would pay $120.00 for the very 
> basics 
>> in 
>> > > afl in a
>> > > > > > minute. "
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > "Introduction to AmiBroker" is alive and well. I have 
> other
>> > > > > projects that
>> > > > > > are getting done along with writing it. Some days 
>> Introduction 
>> > > is
>> > > > > on the
>> > > > > > top of the list, other days it is not. But it will be 
>> published.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It will be pretty much what its title says -- a book about
>> > > > > AmiBroker. Since
>> > > > > > AmiBroker is a trading system development platform, there 
>> will 
>> > > be
>> > > > > discussion
>> > > > > > of trading and trading systems. But, readers looking for 
> a 
>> book
>> > > > > about the
>> > > > > > design, testing, and validation of trading systems should 
>> look 
>> > > at
>> > > > > > "Quantitative Trading Systems," which is already 
> available. 
>> The
>> > > > > > Introduction book is a separate book, more about 
> AmiBroker, 
>> > > less about
>> > > > > > trading systems, and at a more basic level. It is not a 
> new 
>> > > edition
>> > > > > of QTS.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks for the suggestions about joint authorship. I have 
>> > > already
>> > > > > explored
>> > > > > > that.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The author of a book gets very little compensation -- no 
>> matter 
>> > > how
>> > > > > it is
>> > > > > > published. Top end compensation for the author(s) -- if 
>> there 
>> > > are
>> > > > > multiple
>> > > > > > authors, they split this -- is usually about 10% of the 
>> retail 
>> > > price
>> > > > > of the
>> > > > > > book. A $40 book gives two authors $2.00 each per copy.
>> > > > > Introduction to
>> > > > > > AmiBroker might sell 2000 copies over two or three years. 
>> At 
>> > > the rate
>> > > > > > Tomasz is expanding the capabilities of AmiBroker, it 
> would 
>> be 
>> > > unwise to
>> > > > > > make too large a press run, and wise to plan on revised 
>> editions
>> > > > > regularly.
>> > > > > > There are several sections I have re-written already as 
>> > > AmiBroker
>> > > > > changed,
>> > > > > > and the first edition has not yet gone to press.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > There is little reward and a lot of difficulty 
> coordinating 
>> > > efforts.
>> > > > > The
>> > > > > > logistics of two people working from different locations 
> on 
>> a 
>> > > manuscript
>> > > > > > several hundred pages long are very difficult.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It is a one-person job.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > Howard
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Feb 8, 2008 12:25 PM, Ronald Davis <xokie7@> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Lloyd>>>I, also would like to see a presentation using 
>> first
>> > > > > principles.
>> > > > > > > My
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > understanding is that Howard will be completing an 
> entry 
>> > > level book
>> > > > > > > this spring as soon as he completes some obligations 
> this 
>> > > month.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > It might be a better book if Howard and Graham were to 
>> agree 
>> > > to
>> > > > > JOINTLY
>> > > > > > > write the book. The best and most understandable 
>> explanations 
>> > > that
>> > > > > have
>> > > > > > > been given to me have been those from Graham. Graham 
>> seems to 
>> > > have an
>> > > > > > > outstanding ability to describe things in a very 
>> > > understandable
>> > > > > way. Here
>> > > > > > > is his description of SUM from the user manual. Ron D
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 
>> > > 
>> 
> ======================================================================
>> > > =====
>> > > > > > > Sum adds up the last "n" number of bars. It sums 
> whatever 
>> you 
>> > > put
>> > > > > into the
>> > > > > > > first part of the sum formula.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Cum(1) adds 1 to the previous value of Cum, so the 
> first 
>> bar 
>> > > is 1
>> > > > > and it
>> > > > > > > just keeps adding one to the last bar value of cum(1).
>> > > > > > > You can use Cum to add anything, like how many times 
> you 
>> get
>> > > > > rising days
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > the entire chart:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Rise = C>O; //this gives results of 0 or 1
>> > > > > > > TotalRise = Cum(Rise);
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > You could limit this as well to time periods, or any 
>> other 
>> > > condition
>> > > > > > > Example
>> > > > > > > would be one for total rise days since 1995:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > RecentRise = C>O and Year()>=1995; //this gives results 
>> of 0 
>> > > or 1
>> > > > > > > TotalRise = Cum(RecentRise);
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > If you wanted to know how many rising days in the last 
> 12 
>> > > bars you
>> > > > > would
>> > > > > > > use:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > LastRises = Sum(Rise,12);
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 
>> > > 
>> ===================================================================
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > > > > From: "Thomas Ludwig" <Thomas.Ludwig@ <Thomas.Ludwig%
>> > > 40gmx.de>>
>> > > > > > > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amibroker%
>> > > 40yahoogroups.com><amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>>
>> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:14 PM
>> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: no amibroker book?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > brian_z111 wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >> However, I also agree with the others that we need a 
>> good 
>> > > AFL book
>> > > > > > > >> and IMO Tomasz is the man to write it - yes, even if 
>> he 
>> > > has to stop
>> > > > > > > >> development to do it - take a sabbatical and get out 
>> the 
>> > > feathered
>> > > > > > > >> pen Tomasz
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Brian, I agree with Paul and vlanschot that TJ cannot 
>> > > afford to
>> > > > > do this.
>> > > > > > > > And quite frankly - no offense meant, TJ!!! - I'm not 
>> sure 
>> > > if
>> > > > > he's the
>> > > > > > > > right guy to do this. I'm afraid he's frequently 
>> thinking 
>> > > in quite
>> > > > > > > > different categories than most of us who are non-
>> > > programmers and
>> > > > > > > > apparantly much more simple-minded ;-) He's often 
> made 
>> the 
>> > > statement
>> > > > > > > > that every AB user should read the manual from the 
>> first to 
>> > > the last
>> > > > > > > > page over and over again. Yes, true - but that 
> doesn't 
>> > > really
>> > > > > help in
>> > > > > > > > many situations.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Examples? The description of Exrem and Exremspan - 
>> without 
>> > > hints
>> > > > > from
>> > > > > > > > other guys here in the mailing list (who are 
> obviously 
>> more
>> > > > > intelligent
>> > > > > > > > than I am) I would never have understood the whole 
>> purpose 
>> > > of these
>> > > > > > > > functions and when to use them.
>> > > > > > > > Another one: The description of Equity() - my 
> goodness, 
>> > > after
>> > > > > all these
>> > > > > > > > years I still have troubles at times to decide which 
>> flag I
>> > > > > should use
>> > > > > > > > and with which consequences.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > There are many other examples of functions available 
> in 
>> AB 
>> > > that
>> > > > > may be
>> > > > > > > > useful for me in specific situations - but I simply 
>> don't 
>> > > understand
>> > > > > > > > and use them (like Varset). In the past I had very 
>> often the
>> > > > > > > > impression - with a "normal" occupation, a wife and 
> two 
>> > > children who
>> > > > > > > > sometimes felt neglected - that I'm the wrong target 
>> > > customer for AB
>> > > > > > > > and TJ. But, well, over the years the moments of 
>> > > desperation have
>> > > > > > > > become fewer thanks to a lot of pasting of infos from 
>> the 
>> > > list here
>> > > > > > > > (like Graham has mentioned).
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Having said this, I think an AFL book is needed 
> written 
>> > > strictly
>> > > > > from
>> > > > > > > > the user's perspective. I think most of us non-
>> programmers 
>> > > and
>> > > > > > > > non-engineers are in need of "cooking recipes" that 
>> > > organize,
>> > > > > structure
>> > > > > > > > or arrange the vast multitude of possibilities 
>> available in 
>> > > AB in
>> > > > > > > > order to facilitate everyday usage of this excellent 
>> > > application. A
>> > > > > > > > nice example from the AB library as a starter would be
>> > > > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=547
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Brian, Herman and you are doing a really marvelous 
> job 
>> for 
>> > > the
>> > > > > UKB. But
>> > > > > > > > perhaps some more of such "cooking recipes" should be 
>> > > included. It
>> > > > > > > > would be great if more AB users could contribute them.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Just my 2 cents ...
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Greetings,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thomas
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between 
>> users 
>> > > only.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail 
>> > > directly to
>> > > > > > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always 
>> check 
>> > > DEVLOG:
>> > > > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > For other support material please check also:
>> > > > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >  
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> 
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> 
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> 
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 


Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/