|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
-- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "loveyourenemynow" <loveyourenemynow@xxx> wrote:
> I need to optimize on the functions, so their definition should change
> for different optimization parameter, and since I cannot define them
> within if statements I don't see how I could achive whar I want using
> your idea.
I think Graham mentioned to parameterize your functions so that within the function you can have a totally different implementation. e.g.
function Test(myParam, myClose)
{
if (myParam == 0)
{
result = Ref(myClose, -1);
}
else
{
result = StDev(myClose, 10);
}
return result;
}
I think you should focus on achieving the functionality you want within the technology constraints presented instead of focusing on polymorphism (or other design patterns).
Tuzo
__._,_.___
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
![]()
__,_._,___
|