|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Let's hope for 1-second resolution.
------------------------------------------------------------
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/97297
From: "David Clayworth" <dclayw@xxx>
Date: Thu May 25, 2006 8:28 pm
Subject: RE: [amibroker] Time stamp - ASCII Tick Data Import
I asked this question of AB support some time ago. This is the
response I got:
"This is due to the fact that AmiBroker uses its own 32-bit datestamp
that has resolution of 5 seconds but spans years of 1900-2155.
Standard C-language 32-bit timestamp that has resolution of 1-second is
limited to dates from 1970-2023 and therefore can not be used
(year range is to narrow).
However this does not really affect anything as all ticks are imported,
order of ticks is maintaned and all charts look correct and all
analysis is accurate."
Note that I only have the standard version of AB so I am unsure if it
is different for the professional version.
------------------------------------------------------------
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "dbwyatt_1999" <dbw451@xxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks Tomasz. I am not using the ASCII importer. I'm using the IB
> plugin to receive data from IB TWS in realtime. For my analysis, I'm
> running three programs on the same computer: IB TWS, AmiBroker Pro,
> and Investor/RT. AB and IRT receive the same data stream from IB TWS
> in real-time at the same time. I took a detailed look at the price
> bars created on a 10 tick chart for a 10 minute period in both AB and
> IRT. AB created 14 10t bars and IRT created 22 10t bars for the same
> 10 minute period using the exact same IB data feed. Total CPU
> utilization stays under 10% for the entire test period. The total
> volumes for the 10 minute period are approximately the same for both
> AB and IRT 10t charts. The difference in the number of 10t bars
> created between the two charting packages is what concerns me. I
> suspect that I do not have something setup correctly with AB because
> all the AB tick bars have a timestamp that are a multiple of 5
> seconds.
>
> Is there some AB setting that is forcing the timestamps to be
> multiples of 5 seconds for a 10 tick chart created in realtime from
> the IB TWS data feed?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > If you are using ASCII importer and want to import tick data
> > you must use special mode, because ticks are special in that meaning
> > that ticks may have duplicate timestamps. For that reason you need
> > to specify
> >
> > $TICKMODE 1
> >
> > in the ASCII importer definition.
> >
> > See the documentation of ASCII importer - it has very detailed docs
> > in the User's Guide.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > amibroker.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "dbwyatt_1999" <dbw451@>
> > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 10:44 PM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: AB tick bar analysis
> >
> >
> > > Thanks Barry, you do have a point that IB data does not have a
> > > timestamp which would make comparing different captures
> difficult.
> > > The Scottrade DJI tick data looks like it's 2 second snapshots.
> > >
> > > I'm not so much concerned about having exact timestamps, but the
> > > number of tick bars for a time period for the exact same datafeed
> > > should be very close regardless of the timestamps. I mean 10
> ticks
> > > is 10 trades, whether that took 0.23 seconds or 35 seconds. The
> > > number of trades (i.e. number of bars) should be similar between
> > > different charting packages. They may not match up depending on
> > > where the tick counting starts, but overall the total number of
> bars
> > > should be very similar between all charts with the same tick
> > > timeframe. If 1000 trades happened in a given time period, then
> on a
> > > 10 tick chart there should be close to 100 bars.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Barry Scarborough"
> <razzbarry@>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think the reason is that IB does not provide a time stamp with
> > > the
> > >> data it sends and AB has to use the computer clock. If that is
> the
> > >> case the data never will be in sync. That is what I have
> noticed.
> > > My
> > >> last bar close on one minute intraday charts is never the same
> as
> > >> Scottrade or the EOD database from Yahoo. IB sends data before
> the
> > >> open and after the close and that can get shifted into the AB
> > > charts
> > >> depending on your computer clock. Try looking at a few bars
> either
> > >> way and see if the open and close is the same on them. But then
> I
> > >> guess when you are looking at really short term data even
> different
> > >> data feeds may not be in sync.
> > >>
> > >> I dumped the last 100 bars of DJI tick data from Scottrade. If
> you
> > >> have access to IB INDU tick data you could compare them. I can
> send
> > >> the file if that would help.
> > >>
> > >> Barry
> > >>
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|