[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Is native AFL or AFL converted to a Plugin faster?

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links
Hi Ara,
 
correction - 6000 lines.
 
So would a plugin be faster ?.
 
Thanks,Padhu
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Is native AFL or AFL converted to a Plugin faster?

To improve speed you need to compile the code. I assume that's what you mean by converting it to plug-in.
 
Putting it into an include file will make no difference.
----- Original Message -----
From: Padhu
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 8:37 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Is native AFL or AFL converted to a Plugin faster?

My code is too long for my taste( little over 600 lines)...Lot of it is just assignment of entry,stop,exit variables. I'd like to ask for suggestions..
 
1. Does it make any difference if I remove chunk of the code and make it part of an include file ?.
 
2. Does iy make any difference if I have the AFL code converted into an AFL plugin(similar to the chandlier plugin)?. Does this improve speed?.
 
3. What else can be done to manage legnthy codebase better?.
 
 
I have already eliminated various repetitions in my code.
 
Thanks,Padhu
 

__._,_.___

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html



Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___