[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Monte Carlo Simulation



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

In does make sense except for the comment about randomness in markets 
and the weather neither of which I agree with ...

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "rhelfer123" <rhelfer99@xxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Fred,
> 
> In-sample/out-of-sample testing can be performed on Monte Carlo 
> Simulation, on its own. If you get a significantly different MCS 
> bell curve on the out-of-sample data, I would imagine this would 
> indicate the system does not function well on the OOS data. I 
> usually test MCS with OOS and also known bear and bull cycle data, 
> as well. This covers all bases.
> 
> I have never been able to quickly identify a system that works well 
> in MCS using a straight backtest first. However, every time I find 
a 
> system that works well in MCS, it always works well in the straight 
> backtest.
> 
> By "works well" I mean a system that is based in realistic real-
> world statistics. That is, testing that mirrors the true randomness 
> of everyday reality.
> 
> MCS was originally developed to predict where nuclear fallout would 
> land, from nuclear tests in the Southwest desert of the US. The 
> predictions for this MUST be very accurate. MCS was specifically 
> developed for this kind of highly predictive accuracy. Weather 
> patterns are just as random as the stock markets.
> 
> OOS testing is specifically used for preventing curve fitting in 
> backtesting for system optimization. It's a whole different 
> enchilada. You can use OOS with MCS, however.
> 
> I hope this makes sense.
> 
> Thanks for reading,
> 
> rhelfer
> 
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" <ftonetti@> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think your ideas or practices nullify anything ... At 
> worst 
> > they supplement it ...
> > 
> > While I'm not a huge fan of MCS, the methodology does provide 
> > additional information over and above what a straight backtest 
> > provides ...
> > 
> > It's my contention however that this additional information while 
> > beneficial is no substitute for out of sample testing regardless 
> of 
> > how it is performed.
> 
> > Fred
>




Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/