----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:17
PM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] AB vers
4.91
TJ:
Well, it had not happened to me when I wrote the
note. I had done global search on all afl for the files and not found
any. I used the utility you publicized and replaced the words and got 0
replacements.
I then installed 4.91 and so far everything is
working---at least no syntax errors.
Sorry--I should have tried it myself prior to
posting.
Ken
Ken,
Inside comments you are free to use any word :-)
As to "why the syntax errors" - I am pretty much sure that
you are using reserved keywords somewhere.
Thomas from PatternExplorer.com had similar problem and it
was resolved quickly by (as I assume) changing variable
names.
Did you try this:
?
I am asking because I don't know what you mean with "checked almost all of my afl "
- you have to check *all*, not "almost all", and the tool
above allows to do so very quickly (max two minutes and you are
done).
Anyway: if you are getting syntax error inside include then
this include for sure must be checked against using
reserved keyword. Just load the file in question into the
AFL editor and press "Check AFL" button and it will highlight the
place
where syntax is wrong.
Best regards,
Tomasz
Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:48
PM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] AB vers
4.91
TJ:
I was one who asked for more Watchlists, so please do
not change this work.
HOWEVER, I have not upgraded because FastTrack users
are reporting that many (most?) of their include files are showing up with
syntax errors.
You posted that five keywords need to be reserved and
any use of those keywords will trigger a syntax error. I checked
almost all of my afl files (includes and regular) and I never used a single
new keyword, outside of comments. Does the new capability see keywords
in comments? I would doubt it. So why the syntax errors with
includes for FastTrack users?
I notice that the several people who have reported this
syntax error have not been very specific about the kind and detail of the
error message they received. Doing so would be
helpful.
Ken
Hello,
> I think I like the previous system better where List
are not removable, thus avoiding unexpected results.
Be careful what you are asking for !
First people asked to have unlimited watch lists - so I
delivered it PLUS ability to ADD and REMOVE watch lists.
Now you ask to NOT be able to remove watch
list.
Do you really mean that ??? What if you added thousands of
watch lists and you one day decide that you don't need
them?
Best regards,
Tomasz
Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:53
PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] AB vers
4.91
Tomasz,
List 5 was missing! .. somehow deleted, so
the contents I wanted were in List 10, not in 11 where I was
searching.
I think I like the previous system better
where List are not removable, thus avoiding unexpected
results.
Certainly addressing lists by description
would help.
Also showing all empty lists is more of a
distraction than help.
Thanks
Ara
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:56
AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] AB vers
4.91
Ara,
Make sure it is really 11th watch list.
Watch lists are numbered in the order they appear in
the tree.
If you delete watch list that is not the last one,
then higher-numbered watch lists are re-numbered.
Best regards,
Tomasz
Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007
7:20 AM
Subject: [amibroker] AB vers
4.91
Having problems with using
List =
CategoryGetSymbols(
categoryWatchlist,
11);
The list returns a blank. The watchlist is populated and contents
visible.
Anyone having this problem?? Has there been a change in the
way the watchlist is labeled??
Ara