|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "brian.z123" <brian.z123@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 5:33 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting
>
> Fair enough.
>
> A few minutes at the website doesn't equal a trial.
>
> I will take the Ensign trial when I get a chance and have a look at
> the additional studies.
As well as the other characteristics mentioned, including chart quality/clarity/crispness, ease of use, depth of studies, etc. Have fun.
>
> BrianB2.
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "wavemechanic" <fimdot@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Brian:
>>
>> If you are really interested in using charting techniques, have you
> considered looking at some of the programs, including those mentioned
> in previous messages, on a trial basis?
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "brian.z123" <brian.z123@xxx>
>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 8:31 AM
>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is
> charting
>>
>>
>> > Hello Trading Humble,
>> >
>> > I am not having a go at you or pushing any agenda; I am trying to
>> > understand what the chartists want for my own reasons
>> > (if they are using charts in a way that I am not and it is
>> > contributing to their trading success I want to know about it).
>> >
>> > The problem is no-one can specify what it is they are after
>> > (including screenshots).
>> >
>> > Rakesh lists some studies; fair enough, you've definitely drawn
> some
>> > empathy from me.
>> > Without the facts, however, I can't decide either way, but I
> assume
>> > Tomasz must have his reasons why he didn't implement the
> suggestions.
>> >
>> > I read Joe's post of 03 #49871 but without a screenshot I can't
>> > readily understand what he wants.
>> >
>> >
> ********************************************************************
>> >
>> > Re your points.
>> >
>> > I am an art lover.
>> > I particularly like visionary art.
>> > If you want graphics have a look at
>> >
>> > http://iasos.com/artists/
>> >
>> > but I am not looking for an art experience when I open AB.
>> >
>> > I think it looks quite nice and it is visually pleasant while
> working
>> > in it.
>> > We have a choice of skins.
>> >
>> >
>> > I have had a quick look at the Ensign site and I don't agree that
> the
>> > chart quality is superior although the web page is more artistic.
>> >
>> > Crispy can only be an issue of resolution or contrast.
>> > Isn't the resolution the same for most of us (depending on
> computer
>> > graphics card)?
>> > How can another software package have superior resolution to Ami?
>> > Would it show on my computer if it did?
>> >
>> > Contrast comes down to the colours used; two adjacent lines look
>> > different depending on the colours used or perspective.
>> >
>> > How do we add perspective to 2D charts.
>> > Anyway, once again 3D is arty but seldom functional in software.
>> > Of course Ami does have 3D where it counts; in the optimised
> output.
>> >
>> > Doesn't Ami have a full colour palette the equal of other
> software
>> > and don't we have the option to change colour settings?
>> >
>> > Ensign uses a lot of colour which looks *arty*, but does it have
> a
>> > function other than entertainment?
>> >
>> > I love pink, but I am not sure about it in my candlesticks.
>> >
>> > I don't agree that the Ensign charts look any better than Ami's.
>> >
>> > It can't be in the fonts, as they are standard.
>> > Where is the difference?
>> >
>> > Ensign appears to have some extra studies and drawing tools; are
> they
>> > what people want?
>> >
>> > If so why not put forward a well researched and referenced
> request
>> > with screenshots.
>> > Advertise it here and submit it to suggestions and I am sure you
> will
>> > get a hearing.
>> > Some of the fence sitters, like me, may even join in the chorus
>> > asking Tomasz to implement them.
>> >
>> > As for ease of use; how exactly is the way we use Ami's drawing
> tools
>> > any different from other programs (point & click)?
>> >
>> > As I said, I am looking to buy your arguments but no one has made
> a
>> > tempting offer so far.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > BrianB2.
>> >
>> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "tradinghumble" <sharp2be@>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just adding to the opinions here, I think AB is the king of
>> >> backtesting and programming but I have to agree that it lacks
> when
>> >> comes to charting... and I'm not talking about indicators, I'm
>> >> talking about "charting, quality, graphics, etc" ... I've
> brought
>> >> this issue up many times but noone seems to understand it... I
>> > guess
>> >> you have to use TradesStation or even Ensign and QT to
> understand
>> >> what I mean by crispy ... on the other hand, I've hard people
>> >> comparing AB to Metastock.. now, that's silly, AB is miles away
>> > from
>> >> Metastock , 15 times better... so, in summary, if your think is
> EOD
>> >> charts and your main focus is automation, there's no better
> place
>> >> than AB...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Rik Rasmussen" <hrasmussen@>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > You do not mention any way you find it to be inferior.
>> >> >
>> >> > What is it about the charts that you find lacking?
>> >> >
>> >> > Rik Rasmussen
>> >> >
>> >> > > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of itmwh
>> >> > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:50 AM
>> >> > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > > Subject: [amibroker] I think the real defect of Amibroker is
>> >> charting
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I think amibroker as a system
> developing/backtesting/automatic
>> >> > > excecution software is superb, actually, in my opinion, best
> in
>> >> the
>> >> > > market, especially considering the price. But as a new user
> of
>> >> > > Amibroker, I also found the charting proportion of Amibroker
>> >> > > is not as
>> >> > > competive as other functions. I have some experience with
>> >> > > ensign, and
>> >> > > feel that is the best charting software. I am not a
>> > discretionary
>> >> > > trader, and I do not think ensign is worthy of the monthly
>> >> > > subscription
>> >> > > price, so I will stay with Amibroker , but I hope amibroker
>> >> > > can improve
>> >> > > its charting function. A improved charting capability ,will
>> >> appeal to
>> >> > > the vast majority of the retail traders and also greatly
>> > improve
>> >> the
>> >> > > sales of this software, even at a higher price. Just my
>> > personal
>> >> > > thoughts, sorry if not correct.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>> >
>> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
>> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>> >
>> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>> >
>> > For other support material please check also:
>> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.1/690 - Release Date:
> 2/16/2007 2:25 PM
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.2/692 - Release Date: 2/18/2007 4:35 PM
>
>
Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.2/692 - Release Date: 2/18/2007 4:35 PM
|