|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Fred,
Of course I don't think TJ should be reviewing every message, and I
don't think I even hinted at that.
But this used to be more like a *community* years ago. With actual
*dialog*. Not all of that has been lost, but there sure is a lot
more roughness to the tone these days.
Even TJ has not been immune. He *roasts* people (who, admittedly,
post questions they could easily find answers for in a readme) that
he would have been quite a bit more gentle with a few years ago. The
perils of a successful small-business model, I imagine. I don't know
how he does it all, and I know I could not.
Anyway, maybe just posting a reply with a subject that includes OT,
and a "maybe this has drifted OT" might have been better than the
rhetorical, and clearly sarcastic sounding, even if it wasn't meant
to be, "What does that or THIS have to do with AB?"
Sorry I suggested you are a list bully. Maybe you just get up on the
wrong side of the bed some days. ^_^
Yuki
Friday, December 8, 2006, 9:47:09 AM, you wrote:
F> To the best of my knowledge there is no monitor here outside of TJ
F> any more ... If you think his time is better spent reviewing every
F> post to see which ones are related to AB as opposed to which ones
F> aren't then so be it ... I only try to point folks who seem to go on
F> and on with threads that have nothing to do with AB somewhere
F> else ... Even AB-TS would be a better choice as this is the place
F> newbies as well as other come to gain understanding about the
F> features and functions of AB ... not whether or not they should be
F> considering some form of TA, FA or DA ...
F> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>> The point is well known. And *this* overzealousness is *precisely*
>> why Dimitris left this list.
>>
>> Yes, OT, and blah, blah, blah. But look at the post that started
F> the
>> mini-war here, Fred. (at least it led to defense, counterpoint, and
>> *more* messages, not fewer) It was *yours*. Why did this happen?
>>
>> I thought this was a moderated list, so I thought it didn't need
>> attempts at moderation from anyone other than the moderator. And I
>> thought someone other than you was the moderator.
>>
>> So, in addition to the question you posed, I'd pose one myself.
>>
>> Why would you even bother to take the time to compose the message
F> you
>> did, with the tag comment? It was a small detour, and some people
>> like to read. And marked "OT", it's absolutely street legal.
>>
>> That ("please mark this OT", which you could have done without any
>> sarcasm or additional comment at all) should have been your *only*
>> action regarding the subject matter, IMHO.
>>
>> You do a hell of a lot of nice things for this forum and Amibroker,
>> Fred. But you can be a genuine list bully sometimes, too, for no
>> good reason that I can see.
>>
>> Yuki
>>
>> Friday, December 8, 2006, 6:05:52 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> F> Non AB related "pearls" are to be found elsewhere ...
F> Nonsensical or
>> F> otherwise, politcal commentary too ...
>>
>> F> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brpnw1" <tradermail@> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> You guys remind me of the Bush Administration in so many ways.
>> >>
>> >> ~B
>> >>
>> >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sebastiandanconia"
>> >> <sebastiandanconia@> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I used to cast pearls before swine, too, until I discovered
F> that
>> >> some of
>> >> > the swine had better pearls than I did.:) A word to the wise:
>> >> > Over-confidence is a leading indicator of significant
F> drawdowns.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > S.
>> >> >
>> >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brpnw1" <tradermail@> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Obviously I am throwing pearls before swine again. Sorry I
>> >> misread
>> >> > > you.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > ~B
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" ftonetti@ wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Presactly ... I tried to make a joke out of it but I think
F> it
>> >> was
>> >> > > > taken as a typo ...
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sebastiandanconia"
>> >> > > > <sebastiandanconia@> wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > I think what Fred meant was that this is a forum for the
>> >> > > practical
>> >> > > > > application of AB and not for the discussion of trading
>> >> > > philosophy,
>> >> > > > > except as it pertains to demonstrating what AB can do.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Luck,
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Sebastian
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brpnw1" <tradermail@>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > What does good TA have to do with AB? Do you really
F> want
>> F> to
>> >> > > ask
>> >> > > > that
>> >> > > > > > question?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > ~Bman
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" ftonetti@
F> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > > I agree ... Good T & A is one of my favorite
>> >> > > methodologies ...
>> >> > > > but
>> >> > > > > > > what does that or THIS have to do with AB ?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Yuki
>>
Best,
Yuki
Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/579 - Release Date: 12/7/2006 1:31 PM
|