[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [amibroker] Moon Phase... Venus, etc.



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

We know your just joking.

Has / can anyone code the statistical significance of 30 degree angle
Venus - Uranus cycle?...
No I'm not kidding... it's a 225 day market cycle, since the statistical
probability of it
occuring by chance is the topic of discussion.   Is it still 78.6%
+/-accurate on EOD?

Mr. Valley

  -----Original Message-----
  From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of allansn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 12:57 PM
  To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Moon Phase as a profitable predictor



  Howard,
  I personally traded my account to 1 million dollars in equity employing
the phase of the moon...

  Unfortunately,I started with 2 million...:)

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Howard Bandy
  Date: Sunday, September 3, 2006 1:40 pm
  Subject: [amibroker] Moon Phase as a profitable predictor
  To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  > Thanks to everyone who has contributed code to compute the phase of
  > the moon, and to the discussion of whether the phase of the moon is
  > profitably predictive for common stock investing. I have done some
  > testing and find that the phase of the moon is Not a profitable
  > predictor.
  > I used the code posted by OzFalcon (thanks), removed the extraneous
  > information, such as distance to the moon, and added code to compute
  > two values: the percentage close to close change for the day ahead
  > and the percentage of the phase of the moon relative to it being
  > a new
  > moon. My in-sample test was performed on daily data using a period
  > from 1/1/1995 to 1/1/2005 -- ten years. Three indices were
  > studied --
  > the Russell 3000, the S&P 500, and the S&P 600 small cap. The
  > individual backtest results from these AmiBroker runs were exported,
  > opened in Excel, and analyzed. It was relatively easy to identify
  > periods where the price change for the day ahead consistently
  > rose for
  > some values of the phase of the moon, and fell for some other values.
  > The analysis was carried out using several different levels of
  > granularity for the phase of the moon -- from one percent "bins" to
  > twenty-five percent bins -- and several different levels of
  > profitability -- from cherry picking the highest long and highest
  > short returns to "always in". Code was added to the afl procedure
  > that bought and sold accordingly, initially holding exactly one
  > day.
  > No deduction was made for commission or slippage.
  >
  > To test the in-sample performance, I ran individual backtests against
  > the 500 stocks in the S&P 500 and the 100 stocks in the Nasdaq
  > 100.
  > No surprise -- the results were spectacular. For example, using
  > granularity that picked the best twenty percent (about fifteen percent
  > long and six percent short), so the model is invested twenty percent
  > of the time and flat eighty percent of the time, the median RAR
  > statistic for the S&P 500 stocks was about 80%, and the median RAR
  > statistic for the Nasdaq 100 stocks was about 160%.
  >
  > To test the validity of the model, I chose an out-of-sample period
  > from 1/1/2005 through 9/1/2006 -- twenty-one months -- and reran the
  > individual backtests. As expected, the system is invested about
  > twenty percent of the time. The median RAR statistic for the
  > S&P 500
  > stocks was about -7% (minus seven percent), and the median RAR
  > statistic for the Nasdaq 100 stocks was about 0% (zero).
  >
  > I tried several other combinations of granularity of phase (various
  > percentages, daily, always in, etc), strength of signal (strongest
  > only, average of the in-sample tests, etc), length of holding period
  > (one day, several day, stop and reverse, etc). The results were
  > almost always profitable for the in-sample period and Never profitable
  > for the out-of-sample period, even with zero deduction for slippage
  > and commission.
  >
  > I may have missed something here, but I do not think so. I
  > would be
  > happy to hear from forum members who have had success (either
  > profitable trading or profitable performance in out-of-sample tests)
  > using moon phase in their trading, and I will be happy to test and
  > report other reasonable suggestions for using moon phase as a trading
  > indicator.
  >
  > Thanks for listening,
  > Howard
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >