[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Buying at open -- In Real Life



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I'm using Scottrade and trade on NASDAQ only.

intermilan04

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Mark H" <amibroker@xxx> wrote:
>
> Just curious, which broker do you use?
> I use IB and trade at open. I can get the open prices probably 95%
of the times. Not bad but not like the 100% your broker get you.
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: intermilan04 
>   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>   Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 6:52 PM
>   Subject: [amibroker] Re: Buying at open -- In Real Life
> 
> 
>   I am by no means one of the big fish in the market, but I have not
>   experienced a single occassion of slippage. The "opening price" that
>   shows up on Yahoo Finance is the exact price, down to cents, that I
>   traded with. I place orders overnight so internet connection is not
>   my issue; the order is already handled by my broker in pre-market
>   awaiting the opening bell.
> 
>   intermilan04
> 
>   --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Terry" <MagicTH@> wrote:
>   >
>   > So, this is a good lesson in slippage. Slippage WILL HAPPEN. If
it's not
>   > the open price it will be some "surprise" like Iran or N. Korea
drops a
>   > nuke or something much simpler like your internet connection is down
>   > when you need to trade or your take a vacation. The backtester never
>   > takes a vacation and never has computer problems and already "knows"
>   > about all the wars, oil spills, etc ;-)
>   > 
>   > (Not preaching to you Monty, just taking the opportunity and your
>   > research to make a point.)
>   > --
>   > Terry
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>   > Behalf Of the_bear_98
>   > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 16:06
>   > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Buying at open -- In Real Life
>   > 
>   > 
>   > Terry, Yes, it looks like a "minutes" type test, but actually was 
>   > about 750 trades over 8 years with an average holding time of 6.6 
>   > days.
>   > another way to look at the math would be to simply do the
compounding 
>   > of 4% vs. 3.7% 240 times. (approximately the number of full turns I 
>   > got with my stocks over eight years--"back test" data- no way real 
>   > life would hold up.). We get 1.04^240 vs. 1.037^240 for 12,246
times 
>   > your $ vs. 6,122 times your money, or 50% less with "slippage" of 
>   > just 0.3%. I think as long as you can look at things like this in a 
>   > backtested system, you will be more aware of things to monitor
to see 
>   > that you are getting close to what you backtest.
>   > Thanks
>   > Monty
>   > 
>   > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Terry" <MagicTH@> wrote:
>   > >
>   > > Monty,
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > I really like your analysis and thinking on this test, but I
>   > > respectfully submit that if your system drops 50% of it's profits 
>   > for a
>   > > nickel change is price, something else is wrong -- or you are 
>   > trading in
>   > > minutes and not days ;-)
>   > > 
>   > > --
>   > > 
>   > > Terry
>   > > 
>   > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>   > On
>   > > Behalf Of M Webb
>   > > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 12:02
>   > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   > > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Buying at open -- In Real Life
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > You might want to do a sensitivity test to see what happens to
your
>   > > system if you do not get the "OPEN".
>   > > 
>   > > First run the cases where the High is greater than the Open,
and you
>   > > fill at some possible price within that range, and then run the 
>   > cases
>   > > where the Low is lower than the Open and you get that price. Here 
>   > is an
>   > > example of the code. This is not "peeking", it is allowing the 
>   > price to
>   > > wander up or down, and you are getting filled at some % away from 
>   > the
>   > > Open. I used to think that fills could be both over and under 
>   > the "Open"
>   > > by a few cents and over the long run, it should average out to the
>   > > backtested results. Obviously this depends on what your system
is, 
>   > but
>   > > this is what I get with my "Buy on a pullback" system. If you get 
>   > fills
>   > > more than a few tenths of a percent away from the Open, even if 
>   > they are
>   > > on either side, your system can drop like a stone. Yes there is a 
>   > magic
>   > > zone where if you could always buy at the nanosecond the stock 
>   > trades a
>   > > few cents over the Open you make even more money- BUT you can not 
>   > let
>   > > your order be "seen" or of course it will fill and then the price 
>   > will
>   > > drop back a few cents. You have to let the market wander up
and then
>   > > jump in. Better to just try for "Open" and see that your system 
>   > makes
>   > > money even if you miss the Open.
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > --
>   > > 
>   > > Monty
>   > > 
>   > > Buy = Ref(allgood,-1)
>   > > 
>   > > AND O/L>=Varopendrop;
>   > > 
>   > > BuyPrice = O/Varopendrop; 
>   > > 
>   > > _____
>   > >
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>   > 
>   > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
>   > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>   > 
>   > For other support material please check also:
>   > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>   > 
>   > 
>   > Yahoo! Groups Links
>   >
>