[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: Difference between Scan and Backtest



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I would like to chime in on this thread.  I've used AB for years, but find 
that this discrepancy (scan v. backtest) is the one that I spend the most 
time on.  In some cases, I simply cannot diagnose the problem.  Even though 
it seems that there is plenty of cash, no stops, etc, etc, the backtester 
just does not take some trades that scan sees.  I know this is not really 
the place for feature requests, but IMHO I do think that we could use some 
diagnostics from the backtester -- why not a message about why a given trade 
was not taken?

Thanks

chuck


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 5:45 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Difference between Scan and Backtest


> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, james smith <jamesmemphis@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> New user here.
>>
>> I am getting different results with scan and backtest.
>
> This topic appears here every few days, please make a search on old
> messages to find out hundreds of responses.
>
> In short: scan gives RAW signals (may be redundant), backtest gives
> actual trades that are subject to constraints such as round lot size,
> min. pos size, max. pos size, etc, etc, that may cause that trade is
> not entered.
>
> Regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>