Tomaz, but how does AB calculate TR
when O,H,L,C are all recognized as C with mutual funds within AB?
Thanks,
Erik Skyba
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 2:04
PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: ATR on
Closes only?
Hello,
Your question is answered in the help file:
(see 2nd comment).
Best regards, Tomasz Janeczko amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:30
PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: ATR on Closes
only?
Thanks Tim- That doesn't quite do it. The problem is I am
using ATR() with mutual funds, and am now applying the same model to
indexes. The indexes have H,L data which the mutual funds do not. I am
getting wildly different results (100's of trades versus 10's) with the
indexes versus the funds.
Anyone know how AB calculates ATR? In
looking at the original formula from Wilder, there are a few ways of
going about it. I would like to be able to duplicate AB's ATR function
while only referrencing "Close" in the
calculation.
-eric.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Tim Gadd
<timgadd@xxx> wrote: > > Eric, > > If i
understand your question, wouldn't > > abs(MA(Roc(c, 1),
x)); > > give you the average range between bar-to-bar
closing > prices (regardless of up or down) for period x? >
> Tim > > --- ericleake <eleake@xxx>
wrote: > > > Can anyone think of a way to use the ATR
function on > > just the Close > > array, instead of
examining H and L ? > > > > Thanks! > >
-Eric > > > > > > > > >
> > __________________________________________________ >
Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|