|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Same experience here with Comcast. Some
days it takes hours, some days half hour and some days nearly instant.
-----Original Message-----
From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Steve Dugas
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005
13:33
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: how
to get rid of multiple signals from the same stock?
Hi - I was experiencing long
delays (and still am sometimes ) between the time I posted a message and the
time it appeared here - often hours, even *days* a couple of times. A while
back I decided to start tracing my posts and discovered that the delay was
usually not Yahoo's fault, it was occurring between 2 of Comcasts servers.
Seems that service should be better for $50/month... Just thought I
would pass it along...
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday,
December 08, 2005 8:46 AM
Subject: Re:
[amibroker] Re: how to get rid of multiple signals from the same stock?
Should be less
than 10 hours unless you're waiting for the daily digest!
The response
times that I experience between posting a note and seeing it on the forum is
Just ran a
test just for you and it was less than 2 minutes out at 7:42 on the
Yahoo group
forum at 7:44.
I'll agree the
search is frustrating.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday,
December 08, 2005 12:26 AM
Subject: [amibroker]
Re: how to get rid of multiple signals from the same stock?
You
have a valid point. I might add that this board takes ten hours
before your message gets posted, too.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"siu_john" <siu_john@x...>
wrote:
>
> Well, I for one always want to search thru
all messages first before
> posting since I like instant answers (but I
am extremely impressed
> with the amibroker staff's response time,
which is pretty close to
> instant :). However, in this group, it
is almost impossible since
> Yahoo groups don't provide that
functionality. They require you to
> click a million times in order to search thru
all messages. Each
> search only searches 1% or so of the
messages, even when no results
> are found within that percentage! -- I have
no idea why Yahoo groups
> is so behind.. Google groups or almost
any other msg boards search
> thru all messages instantly. I believe
much of the staff's time can
> be saved from answering repeat questions if
this forum is moved to a
> better one.
> -john
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Graham
<kavemanperth@xxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I think you will find you need to put this
into a for loop, or add
> > more variables
> >
> > Have you tried doing a search on the
group archives as this sae
> > question has been discussed a number of
times
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Graham
> > AB-Write >< Professional AFL
Writing Service
> > Yes, I write AFL code to your
requirements
> > http://e-wire.net.au/~eb_kavan/ab_write.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/8/05, ricko8294_98
<ricko@xxxx> wrote:
> > > I am having a similar problem with
eliminating a second (or more)
> > > trades on the same stock during the
same day. I have included exrem
> > > to eliminate multiple buys before a
sell signal is given and I don't
> > > want to use a time restriction.
> > >
> > > What my 3 minute bar system has (in
part) is the following:
> > >
> > > in_trade = 0; // to control one
trade per day
> > > nuday = Day() !=
Ref(Day(),-1); // to indicate a new day
> > >
> > > Then my Buy code is
> > > Buy = in_trade == 0 AND
LongCond1 AND {the rest of my buy
conditions}
> > >
> > > then comes my Sell code
> > >
> > > followed by
> > > Buy = exrem(buy,sell);
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > in_trade = Flip( Buy, nuday);
/ to reset in_trade for the next day
> > > but retain the value (which becomes
"1" on the bar where the first
> > > buy is executed).
> > >
> > > The system will occasionally issue
a second buy signal on the SAME
> > > stock on the SAME day (I can tell
because I plot the buy arrows)
EVEN
> > > THOUGH the Interpretation window tells
me the value of in_trade at
> > > that point is 1 (not 0 as required
by the Buy code).
> > >
> > > So - 2 questions
> > > 1 how can I eliminate the second
trade on the same stock on the same
> > > day (my primary objective)?
> > >
> > > 2. why does the Buy code ignore the
in_trade ==0 part of the code?
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > Rick
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Graham <kavemanperth@xxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > you can use exrem to remove
additional signals
> > > > you can use code to only
include the first signal of the day, or
> > > even
> > > > withi certain time paramters,
and exclude others
> > > > It is just matter of adding
the right conditions to the buy/sell
> > > statements
> > > >
> > > > Buy = ???;
> > > > Sell = ???;
> > > > Buy = exrem(buy,sell);
> > > >
> > > > eg if you only want to buy
beofre 10am in the morning
> > > > Buy = YourBuyConditions and
timenum()<100000;
> > > >
> > > > There are a few other ways but
could need tailoring to your system
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Graham
> > > > AB-Write >< Professional
AFL Writing Service
> > > > Yes, I write AFL code to your
requirements
> > > > http://e-wire.net.au/~eb_kavan/ab_write.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/7/05, siu_john
<siu_john@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Tomasz or anyone,
> > > > > I am doing AA
scans/explores on a group or all of my stocks and
> > > in
> > > > > too many times, the
signal happens multiple times thru out the
> > > day for
> > > > > the same stock.
Thus my results are flooded with too many
siganls
> > > > > instead of the only few
stocks that are actually returned.
> > > > > I am wondering how do I
return either:
> > > > > - the latest signal
only per stock (for latest signal purpose)
> > > > > and/or
> > > > > - the first signal
and skip to analyse next stocks in question
> > > (for
> > > > > execution speed purpose)
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, is there a _REAL_
reason to seperate the functionality of
> > > Scans
> > > > > and Explorations? I
find it that I like reporting power of
> > > > > explorations (Scans don't
execute Filters, AddColumn()s, etc.)
> > > and the
> > > > > automation of scans
(checkbox of "Scan every x-minutes" don't
> > > apply to
> > > > > explorations).
But seems like I can't have both because of the
> > > > > artifically created
distinctions.. It would be so great if
we can
> > > > > have both! (unless
there's a much better reason for the
> > > seperation).
> > > > >
> > > > > thank you so much,
> > > > > -john
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note that this
group is for discussion between users
only.
> > > > >
> > > > > To get support from
AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> > > > > SUPPORT {at}
amibroker.com
> > > > >
> > > > > For other support
material please check also:
> > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please note that this group is for
discussion between users only.
> > >
> > > To get support from AmiBroker
please send an e-mail directly to
> > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > >
> > > For other support material please
check also:
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
|