|
Hello,
For minor (0.001%) differences between recursively
calculated indicators in AA vs IB - see my answer to Fred's post.
For much bigger differences in OscP as you show it
in your charts: you probably have some different periodicity
setting
or pre/after hours filtering applied to bars or
some other wrong setting because using this code:
Op = OscP( 3,
10 );
Plot( Op, "Op",
colorRed );
AddColumn( Op, "Op" );
Filter=Status("LastBarInRange");
I am NOT getting any difference between AA and
IB
Best regards,
Tomasz
Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:28
AM
Subject: [amibroker] AA vs. IB
discrepancy
As mentioned in a previous thread, I am getting a
discrepancy between AA and IB for daily mutual fund data, although weekly is
OK. The data is OK with C in all fields. Originally, I thought I
solved the problem by assigning C to O, H, L but upon further checking this is
not correct. No matter what I try the daily AA is different from the
daily IB. The attached gifs show the AA and IB results for the Price
Oscillator.
The formula used for Osc is Osc = 100 * OscP(3,
10) and the AA filter is Filter =
Status("LastBarInRange").
Would appreciate it if someone would duplicate what
I am getting and, hopefully, find the cause for this discrepancy. OscP()
is a price oscillator calculated by taking the difference between two
moving averages. So why one timeframe works and one does not is beyond
me.
Bill
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|