[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Fw: The Elliot Waves



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  Rakesh 
  Sahgal 
  To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 11:30 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Fw: The Elliot 
  Waves
  
  BillHow about the methodology used by AGET using the 0535as a 
  primary reference point and focussing only on theidentification of 
  impulsions/correctives of higherdegrees?  I have Miner's book as well 
  as the articlesby the cretaors of AG. Both of them say instead ofbeing 
  purist Ellioticians one is well advised to focuson the  parts that 
  can enhance trading profitability.Maybe this effort could go in that 
  direction?
   
  Of the three EW commercial programs 
  that I have looked at I thought AGET was the poorest with respect to 
  counts.  The 5/35 analysis, as I recall, applied to 4 for an AGET count 
  and Tom Joseph does not tell you how often it is right.  And how does it 
  work if one does not use AGET's count - I don't know.  Miner, imo, is the 
  bible and his "loose" version of EW (e.g., not being rigid about 4 overlapping 
  1, conditions for 3, no heartburn over violating "inviolate" rules, 
  etc.) has always made the most sense to me, although not from a potential 
  programmable viewpoint.  Of course, there are three somewhat distinct EW 
  schools, so one can pick whchever feels comfortable, although unfortunately 
  nobody knows which one works best ;-)  The combination of indicators and 
  EW, as you suggest, is the way I play the game, but whether it can be coded in 
  a relatively short time (compared to many, many years spent by developers 
  of AGET, ELWave, and EWAIII) remains to be seen.  Strictly from a 
  programming viewpoint, my guess is that Neo-Wave (Neely) and its attempt 
  to remove all subjectivity might be the closest to an EW description suitable 
  for programming so that one avoids the ifs, ands, or buts that AGET, 
  ELWave, and EWAIII try to handle.  Of course, Neely's book is over 200 
  pages and is chock full of rules, so a programming masochist would have a 
  field day ;-).  
   
  Rakesh--- wavemechanic <<A 
  href="">wd78@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> 
  >   ----- Original Message ----- >   From: 
  Dimitris Tsokakis >   To: <A 
  href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  >   Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 4:43 AM>   
  Subject: [amibroker] Fw: The Elliot Waves> > 
  >   The following code will recognize a complete> 
  Elliot Wave [according to> <A 
  href="">http://www.equis.com/Education/TAAZ/?page=53 
  ]>   sequence.> >   The Equis article 
  regarding EW is an overview of> some of the patterns but is certainly 
  not sufficient> to produce a valid count.> >   
  X=BarIndex(); >   p=Param("p",5,5,30,5);>   
  z=Zig(C,p);>   CONDP=PeakBars(C,P)==0;>   
  E7=ValueWhen(CONDP,C,1);T7=ValueWhen(CONDP,X,1);>   
  E5=ValueWhen(CONDP,C,2);T5=ValueWhen(CONDP,X,2);>   
  E3=ValueWhen(CONDP,C,3);T3=ValueWhen(CONDP,X,3);>   
  E1=ValueWhen(CONDP,C,4);T1=ValueWhen(CONDP,X,4);>   
  CONDT=TroughBars(C,P)==0;>   
  E8=ValueWhen(CONDT,C,1);T8=ValueWhen(CONDT,X,1);>   
  E6=ValueWhen(CONDT,C,2);T6=ValueWhen(CONDT,X,2);>   
  E4=ValueWhen(CONDT,C,3);T4=ValueWhen(CONDT,X,3);>   
  E2=ValueWhen(CONDT,C,4);T2=ValueWhen(CONDT,X,4);>   
  E0=ValueWhen(CONDT,C,5);T0=ValueWhen(CONDT,X,5);>   // EW 
  definition>   EW=E5>E3 AND E3>E1 AND E5>E7 AND 
  E4>E2 AND E2>E0> AND E6>E8 AND T8>T7 AND 
  CONDT;>   Plot(C,"C",1,64);>   
  Plot(z,"",colorYellow,styleThick);>   
  //PlotShapes(shapeDownArrow*CONDP,colorRed);>   
  PlotShapes(shapeUpTriangle*EW,colorBlue);>   
  //PlotShapes(shapeUpArrow*CONDT,colorBrightGreen);>   Plot(EW 
  ,"",colorPink,2+styleOwnScale);>   Filter=EW;// explore for 
  all quotations>   AddColumn(C,"C");>   
  GraphXSpace=8;> >   A blue triangle and a pink bar 
  will indicate the> 8th EW point.>   [The signs will be 
  placed in the graph as soon as> trough E8 is recognized as a trough. 
  ]>   I hope it will give a starting point for further> 
  analysis.>   Dimitris Tsokakis> >   
  PS1. A 4-year pattern was completed on Oct1998,> [p=15, ^NDX], before 
  the big movement >   PS2. A 6-year pattern was completed on 
  Sept2001, > [p=15, ^GDAXI]. The expectation [at E5] of an EW> 
  behavior>   for DAX would be quite 
  profitable.__________________________________Do you 
  Yahoo!?Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.<A 
  href="">http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail------------------------ 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of 
  pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for 
  free!<A 
  href="">http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/GHeqlB/TM--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 
  Check AmiBroker web page at:<A 
  href="">http://www.amibroker.com/Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go 
  to:     <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/<*> 
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:     
  <A 
  href="">amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<*> 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:     <A 
  href="">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Check AmiBroker web page at:
http://www.amibroker.com/

Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html








Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 












Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/ 
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.