|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi DT,
Just a thought here - don't most companies operate on a fiscal year that
differs from the calender year? Would it be worthwhile to investigate yearly
periods that begin on other dates?
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 5:25 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: A technical question
> Yuki,
> these timing systems try to immitate the market behavior and the
> great movers restrictions/plans[buy every X/sell every Y bars]
> We know that new plans are activated by the new year and [probably]
> have a yearly perspective.
> For the specific Nikkei, it is obvious that the plans/targets for
> 2004 [and the way they will try to reach these targets] are quite
> different than the respective plans one year ago.
> The first peak/trough of the year will give the rhythm of the market.
> [It seems more reasonable to me to check the recent rhythm than the
> rhythms of the last year].
> From my N100 studies, it would be much better to use each year rhythm
> for 14-16 months and then following more fresh rhythms.
> The last year rhythms may continue in an independent trading project,
> the IP period is quite short [17 bars] and will smell without delay
> the upcoming champion.
> Dimitris Tsokakis
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxxx> wrote:
> > Hi DIMITRIS,
> >
> > Monday, January 19, 2004, 5:24:36 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > DT> Yuki,
> > DT> The new code will place the arrows the very same bar they
> appear and
> > DT> is independent of AA settings [delay +1].
> >
> > Nice, DT. Thanks for the goodies -- as usual. Even unusual
> goodies.
> > ^^_^^
> >
> > DT> Another interesting point : We are in 2004. We should discover
> > DT> the first significant peak/trough of the year [??] to build up
> > DT> the Nikkei 2004 timing code, then give it 5months and begin the
> > DT> new IP for the new year.
> >
> > Well . . . this brings up the (to me, anyway) obvious question of:
> If
> > this is a self-adjusting system, why would we ever need to start
> over
> > with a clean slate? Why would we not expect this system to remain
> > good for the entire year? I'm confused, but then . . . I'm easy to
> > confuse. ^_-
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Yuki
>
>
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|