[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Optimizing Selection Criteria vs Timing Signals



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Ken, with those warning signs, I'd agree that you **may** be wise to
take a second look, lol.  I've posted some other info on degrees of
freedom this morning that you may find interesting.  Mark

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ken Close" <closeks@xxxx> wrote:
> Mark: thanks for the responses.  Indeed it is tricky for me to keep
> straight.  My warning signs are if I am producing > 200CAR, with
>90%
> accuracy and <10%dd I **may** give some thought to it being
> overoptimized and curve fit.   :-o
> 
> 
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: quanttrader714 [mailto:quanttrader714@x...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:34 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Optimizing Selection Criteria vs Timing
Signals
> 
> These are great questions.  Comments below.
> 
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ken Close" <closeks@xxxx> wrote:
> > Do the same pitfalls and prohibitions exist for keeping a constant
> > timing signal (whatever it is) yet optimizing variables that alter
> > basket selection criteria?  Can you "curve fit" a set of selection
> > criteria?
> 
> Here, it's pretty clear cut.  You're reducing degrees of freedom and
> whenever you do that, you're curve fitting.
>  
> > It "feels" like the problems would be different (and perhaps
> minimized)
> > because of the dynamic changes that occur, ESPECIALLY if stop
> conditions
> > are used.  OTOH, I suppose it would not be different using the
same
> > criteria on the same basket of stocks over the same time period 
as
> this
> > would yield the same baskets of stocks each time.  What I mean by
> that
> > is that for a given combination of criteria, the same stocks would
> be
> > selected.
> 
> This part is trickier.  Could be debated but I'd say that if your
> constant basket of stocks is not necessarily all stocks but the
> *universe* of stocks that you would consider trading or a random
> sample of it, you're not reducing degrees of freedom.  Because your
> code is free to choose any stock (that you'd trade).  But when you
> restrict that freedom, you're curve fitting.
> 
> 
> 
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/