|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree Dingo would be perfect. But then there are shades of gray and
posts have to be taken into context. For example is what I wrote in
response to Pal a flame? (*before* reading Tomasz's post I might add,
lol). Seems like another argument for a referee.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gary A. Serkhoshian"
<serkhoshian777@xxxx> wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
> I appreciate your response, but I really don't think your method is
working. People have been sniping at each other for the past weeks,
and even some of the more upstanding members of our board have been
dragged in. Consequently, the quality of the board has suffered as
many have pointed out in posts, yet the only comment I've read from
you on the board was to Fred saying it wasn't his place to tell people
to "go away".
>
> We all have bad days which we bring into posts. That's okay. I'm
just asking you to step in and break it up when it happens. Somebody
gotta moderate the masses, but I don't think "voting" members off the
board a la "Survivor" is a good idea.
>
> We're all adults. So, when asked nicely to stop acting childish
results in more bickering from the member in question, then you should
given them the axe. Simple as that.
>
> By the way, I'm not complaining about Pal specifically. A lot of
people have been sniping at him as much as he's been sniping them.
That's why you need to step in and referee or assign someone to do
that. I nominate Dingo : )
>
> Warmest,
> Gary
>
>
> Tomasz Janeczko <amibroker@xxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I expressed it several times that flame wars of any kind will not be
tolerated here.
> As written in Group FAQ:
http://www.egroups.com/files/amibroker/groupfaq.html
>
> What are the guidelines for posting?
>
> Subscribers that do not use standard list etiquette may be
removed from the list if a subscriber vote indicates that this is what
the list wants
>
> So if I receive 5 more complaints about Pal or anyone else I may be
forced to remove given person, or
> switch him/her into "moderated" status.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gary A. Serkhoshian
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:53 PM
> Subject: [amibroker] STOP THE FLAME WARS NOW !!!!
>
>
> The e-mail below is nothing more than inflamatory, and Pal you are
smart enough to know that.
>
> TJ, you have got to step in or assign someone this duty NOW or else
this board will degenerate into the patheticly useless TradeStation list.
>
> Respectfully,
> Gary
>
> palsanand <palsanand@xxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> You are magnanimous and indomitable. You are like my big brother, so
> is Steve. You both have superegos and it is unfortunate that you
> both could not reconcile your differences yet. I am the loser and I
> suspect so are others. You must measure what you might gain by what
> you might lose...
>
> rgds, Pal
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "quanttrader714"
> <quanttrader714@xxxx> wrote:
> > It's late and I've had too much scotch, so one very quick example
> > which I'll explain the basics of but would like to have someone else
> > please take a stab at interpreting.
> >
> > To recap the Robustness Criteria, Condensed Version 1-5:
> >
> > 1. Test on small, mid & large cap stocks in bull, bear & sideways
> > markets.
> > 2. Evaluate performance on top 20% most actively traded small, mid &
> > large cap stocks.
> > 3. Graph and evaluate system performance consistency (%profit/trade
> > and % profit/bar) on select stocks.
> > 4. Perform simulation to estimate probability of profit in 10 trades
> > (for select stocks).
> > 5. Perform simulation to estimate future drawdown (for select
> stocks).
> >
> > For this example I picked a stock, any stock. I think everyone gets
> > what I mean by criteria 1 and 2 (whether they agree or not), correct
> > me if I'm wrong. I've posted the output of criteria 3-5 in the
> > example folder in the photos section. Criterion 3 output is photos
> 1
> > and 2, criterion 4 output is photos 3 and 4, and criterion 5 output
> is
> > photos 5 and 6. I think the criterion 3 graphs are self
> explanatory.
> > On criterion 4, forget how it's calculated for now. It estimates
> the
> > probability of profit (and how much) at the end of 10 trades. Unit
> of
> > measure is % of starting equity. Looking at the histogram, the
> > highest bin (the mode of the distribution) is 19.16 -- 29.63 which
> > means approx 15.5% of the time (y axis) the profit at the end of 10
> > trades fell in this bin, between 19.16% and 29.63% of initial
> equity.
> > The cumulative distribution graph is the histogram in cumulative
> > form and shows the likelihood that a result falls below the value on
> > the x axis. For example, 20% of the simulations (of the sum of 10
> > trades) lost money so you can *estimate* there's an 80% chance
> you'll
> > be profitable after 10 trades with this. Same unit of measure for
> max
> > dd and those graphs are read the same way. P.S. Each simulation was
> > 1000 runs, so the graphs of criterion 3 show one actual pass through
> > the data by AB, while the others depict the collective results of
> 1000
> > simulated runs (and include my adjustment factor).
>
>
>
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
>
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/I3w.vC/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|