|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
DT: I find this quite interesting after plotting and backtesing numbers
of stocks and watchlists.
I do not understand .... " All signals are based on ^NDX chart."
I do not understand the use of the SetForeign command and what it does
in this context. I comment it out and nothing changes.
Errrrrr.....I just changed "^NDX" to my index symbol "NDX-X" and the
returns tripled......Errrrrr......Why??
This was attractive when I was using it incorrectly, and now it is even
better.
How do you come up with these things???????
Thanks for any further explanation.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS [mailto:TSOKAKIS@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:22 AM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Two Days after the Bullish Inflection
The main purpose was to show the use of inflection points.
The results are not bad, if you consider it is a TTM [Trade The
Market] system. All signals are based on ^NDX chart.
This approach [and the successful behavior of the majority] gives a
good reason to use ^NDX as a trading platform.
The comparison with B&H is also good to me.
We didn't decide on Jan1 to Buy & Hold, as far as I remember !!
We mainly decided to trade a cloudy market with very sad bearish
memories. When I was searching, last spring, for prolonged uptrend
indications, the request was a bit funny, many traders were waiting
another bearish episode and *nobody* would trust a B&H strategy.The
other useful result of this study is the transformation of Price
directly into an oscillation [without the indirect methods like RSI,
Stochastics etc]. Give me some time, the project is ready, but it
needs the bloody writing time !!
Thank you for your comments.
Dimitris Tsokakis
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dave Merrill" <dmerrill@xxxx>
wrote:
> thanks for this Dimitris, it looks very interesting.
>
> unfortunately, I don't see the performance results as positively as
you seem
> to. over the past year, the NASDAQ 100 stocks show Annual system %
return of
> 44.13%, but Annual B&H % return was 65.01%. for 2003, Annual system
% return
> was 29.73%, but Annual B&H % return was 54.14%. for all quotes
(QuotesPlus),
> Annual system % return was 19.14%, Annual B&H % return 30.58%.
>
> there may be other ways we can make use of this principle, which
seems quite
> right-headed, but for reasons that aren't entirely clear to me, it
doesn't
> perform that well in its current state.
>
> dave
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|