[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: more positionsize results I don't understand



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Dave,
 
If your position size is set to 10% of equity it 
means
10% of TOTAL current equity.
 
Your total initial equity was 10000.
You have entered first positon, 10% of total equity has been 
put into trade.
Now your first trade earns $94.86 , 
then TOTAL equity at the time when you enter SECOND
trade is 10094.86. Now 10% from TOTAL equity is 
1009.486.
 
In other words PositionSize refers to TOTAL available 
equity.
 
Best regards,Tomasz Janeczkoamibroker.com
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  Dave Merrill 
  
  To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:24 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: more 
  positionsize results I don't understand
  
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>here's the short trade list and comments I posted 
  earlier:
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003> 
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>--------------------------
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>these are the first two trades in one of the stocks 
  at 100% positionsize:
   
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>Profit    
  Position948.62    10,000.00276.68    
  10,948.60
   
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>the first trade made $948.62 profit, which the second 
  trade invested, takinga $10,948.60 position.
   
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>here's the same two trades at 10% 
  positionsize:
   
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>Profit    
  Position94.86     1,000.0025.51     
  1,009.49
   
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>the first trade made $94.86 profit, but the second 
  one invested only 10% ofthat profit, taking a $1,009.49 position. 
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>--------------------------
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003> 
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>seems pretty clear, and not what i'd 
  expect.
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003> 
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>I am looking forward to 4.5's enhanced portfolio 
  testing capabilities, but in the mean time, I'm trying to make sure I 
  understand how things work now. Tomasz, if you have time for a comment, 
  it'd be appreciated.
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003> 
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>thanks,
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003> 
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003>dave
  <SPAN 
  class=173411621-17092003> 
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  >I 
    can't see you trade list but am I correct in assuming that there is gap 
    between all exits and the next round of buys ?  If so then I see 
    your point, if not then this could be a factor.  I think all issues 
    like this will get resolved in v4.50 ... until then 
    ...Fred--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dave Merrill" 
    <dmerrill@xxxx> wrote:> fred, I appreciate your patience 
    with me, must be I've got a blind spot> today... or 
    not...> > I shouldn't have brought up total account growth 
    rate at all. of course that> depends on whether you're inveesting 
    the actual account size or ten times> that.> > and 
    I do understand Tomasz' msg that percentage profit shown for each 
    stock> is relative to the total account balance. that means that if 
    each stock> invests 1/10th as much, its percentage return will be 
    1/10th as large.> > > but did you look at the 
    individual trades I posted? why are only 10% of the> profits from 
    the first trade invested in the second trade when positionsize> 
    is 10%?> > it seems to me that this is the reason that the 
    dollar return on each> individual stock in the 10% case are 
    disproportionately low, less than> 1/10th of the 100% case. the 
    entry price, exit price, and percentage price> change are the 
    same in both cases. what's different is the size of the> 
    positions taken -- 90% of any profits made don't get reinvested, so 
    they> don't compound.> > am I making any sense, or 
    still deluded?> > dave> >   It's not 
    about POSITIONSIZE ... it's about COMPOUNDING ...> 
    >   AGAIN ... The first situation you described was 10 
    stocks each of>   which trade the full account balance .vs. 
    the second situation which>   was 10 stocks each of 
    which trade 10% of the account balance.> >   This is 
    simple math ... situation #1 compound an order of 
    magnitude>   faster then situation #2> 
    >   i.e.> >   Situation 1 w/10% 
    gains on each stock means account balance is>   DOUBLED 
    after the first set of trades, QUADRUPLED after the 
    second>   set and so on ...> >   
    Situation 2 w/10% gains has a 10% gain after the first set of 
    trades>   and 21% after the second set and so 
    on.> >   So after both are done with the first set 
    of trades there's a 10x1>   ratio in gains, but after the 
    second set the ratio is 20x1 ...Send 
  BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
  suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.