[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [amibroker] Re: DMI problem



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




I am 
just getting back from watching the Tennis Master tournament up in Montreal so 
am a bit bogged down here. The code I posted was simply translated from 
MS....... I will try to figure it out later in the day. I qouls have guessed 
that DT was on the right path I will experiment with the 
smoothing.......
 
Regards, 
Jayson 
<FONT face=Tahoma 
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS 
[mailto:TSOKAKIS@xxxxxxxxx]Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:15 
AMTo: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [amibroker] Re: 
DMI problemIt is strange.The huge dmi 
indmi=((StDev(C,5)* CMO5)+(StDev(C,10)* 
CMO10)+(StDev(C,20)*CMO20))/(StDev(C,5)+StDev(C,10)+StDev(C,20));is not 
because of some very small denominator [usual reason], but is due to a huge 
numerator.In this numerator, the huge is the CMO5 and inCMO5=DEMA(100 * 
(( CMO5_1 -CMO5_2) /( CMO5_1+CMO5_2)),3);we do not have very small 
denominator, the whole 100 * (( CMO5_1 -CMO5_2) /( CMO5_1+CMO5_2)) is cool, 
the DEMA(...,3) makes the huge value.You should cancel CMO5 from the 
formula, or limit it in the [-100,100] interval.So, replace the first 
lines with//Cmo5 formulaCMO5_1=Sum( IIf( C > Ref( C, -1 ) , ( C - 
Ref( C ,-1 ) ) ,0 ) ,5 ) ;CMO5_2=Sum( IIf( C < Ref( C ,-1 ) , ( Ref( C 
,-1 ) - C ) ,0 ) ,5 );CMO5=DEMA(100 * (( CMO5_1 -CMO5_2) /( 
CMO5_1+CMO5_2)),3);CMO5=IIf(CMO5>100,99,CMO5);CMO5=IIf(CMO5<-100,-99,CMO5);//Cmo10 
formulaCMO10_1=Sum( IIf( C > Ref( C, -1 ) , ( C - Ref( C ,-1 ) ) ,0 ) ,10 
) ;CMO10_2=Sum( IIf( C < Ref( C ,-1 ) , ( Ref( C ,-1 ) - C ) ,0 ) ,10 
);CMO10=DEMA(100 * (( CMO10_1 -CMO10_2) /( 
CMO10_1+CMO10_2)),3);CMO10=IIf(CMO10>100,99,CMO10);CMO10=IIf(CMO10<-100,-99,CMO10);//Cmo20 
formulaCMO20_1=Sum( IIf( C > Ref( C, -1 ) , ( C - Ref( C ,-1 ) ) ,0 ) ,20 
) ;CMO20_2=Sum( IIf( C < Ref( C ,-1 ) , ( Ref( C ,-1 ) - C ) ,0 ) ,20 
);CMO20=DEMA(100 * (( CMO20_1 -CMO20_2) /( 
CMO20_1+CMO20_2)),3);CMO20=IIf(CMO20>100,99,CMO20);CMO20=IIf(CMO20<-100,-99,CMO20);Now 
we have just a few problems with 8308, 5406 and 1861.I noticed that there 
are also some EMA(dmi,pds) {empty} values !!!!!!!I give up, Jason should 
look at the formula again !!!Dimitris Tsokakis--- In 
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx> 
wrote:> I run the same for the ^N225 database and [!!] many examples 
appeared.> Let me search please and revert.> Dimitris 
Tsokakis> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" 
<TSOKAKIS@xxxx> > wrote:> > Yuki,> > I 
added to your formula> > Filter=1;> > 
AddColumn(Highest(EMA(DMI,PDS)),"DMIh");> > 
AddColumn(Lowest(EMA(DMI,PDS)),"DMIl");> > 
AddColumn(Highest(MA(DMI,PDS1)),"TRIGGERh");> > 
AddColumn(Lowest(MA(DMI,PDS1)),"TRIGGERl");> > and explored for the 
n=1 last quotations the whole N100 database > from > > Jan2000 
till now.> > No value was found out of the [-100,100] range.> 
> [101*900 different bars]> > Dimitris Tsokakis> > --- In 
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxxx> wrote:> > 
> I attach two charts, both displaying DMI as described by Jason:> 
> > > > >  //Dynamic Momentum Index Tushar Chande 
Translated to AFL by > Jayson > > Casavant> > > 
//Cmo5 formula> > > CMO5_1=Sum( IIf( C > Ref( C, -1 ) , ( C - 
Ref( C ,-> 1 ) ) ,0 ) ,5 ) ;> > > CMO5_2=Sum( IIf( C < 
Ref( C ,-1 ) , ( Ref( C ,-1 ) - > C )  ,0 ) ,5 );> > > 
CMO5=DEMA(100 * (( CMO5_1 -CMO5_2)  /( CMO5_1+CMO5_2)),3);> > 
> > > > //Cmo10 formula> > > CMO10_1=Sum( IIf( C 
> Ref( C, -1 ) , ( C - Ref( C ,-> > 1 ) ) ,0 ) ,10 ) ;> > 
> CMO10_2=Sum( IIf( C < Ref( C ,-1 ) , ( Ref( C ,-1 ) - > > C 
)  ,0 ) ,10 );> > > CMO10=DEMA(100 * (( CMO10_1 
-CMO10_2)  /( CMO10_1+CMO10_2)),3);> > > > > > 
//Cmo20 formula> > > CMO20_1=Sum( IIf( C > Ref( C, -1 ) , ( C - 
Ref( C ,-> > 1 ) ) ,0 ) ,20 ) ;> > > CMO20_2=Sum( IIf( C 
< Ref( C ,-1 ) , ( Ref( C ,-1 ) - > > C )  ,0 ) ,20 );> 
> > CMO20=DEMA(100 * (( CMO20_1 -CMO20_2)  /( 
CMO20_1+CMO20_2)),3);> > > > > > // dmi 
formula> > > dmi=((StDev(C,5)* CMO5)+(StDev(C,10)* 
CMO10)+(StDev(C,20)*> > > 
CMO20))/(StDev(C,5)+StDev(C,10)+StDev(C,20));> > > 
pds=Param("Smoothing",3,1,10,1);> > > pds1=Param("Trigger 
Line",5,1,10,1);> > > > > > Plot(EMA(dmi,pds),"Dynamic 
Momentum Index",colorDarkGreen,1);> > > 
Plot(MA(dmi,pds1),"trigger",colorRed,1);> > > > > > 
Buy=Cross(EMA(dmi,pds),MA(dmi,pds1));// AND Trend;> > > 
Sell=Cross(MA(dmi,pds1),EMA(dmi,pds));// AND NOT (Trend);> > > 
PlotShapes(IIf(Buy,shapeUpArrow,shapeNone) ,colorBrightGreen);> > > 
PlotShapes(IIf(Sell,shapeDownArrow,shapeNone),colorRed);> > > 
> > > What is the difference in these two DMI plots?  I simply 
scrolled > > the> > > screen one date to the 
right.> > > > > > I have this problem with several 
stocks, but the date that the> > > indicator goes haywire on is not 
the same for any of them.  I also> > > cannot find 
anything wrong with the data on the date that the> > > indicator 
goes nuts.  It is data that is right in line with both> > > 
price and volume, not extraordinary in any way.  But the 
indicator> > > becomes worthless, suddenly.> > > 
> > > Can anyone clue me in here?> > > > > 
> YukiSend 
BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
group FAQ at: <A 
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor












Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.