[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [amibroker] Re: Yo Chuck ... Regarding Staying within Hedge contract boundaries ...



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




I will 
try very hard to answer your questions in as much detail as possible, without 
asking another question.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
I 
would like to be able to dynamically indicate what percentage 
of available funds can be applied to long trades and what percentage could be 
applied to short trades.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
The 
reason that I say "dynamically" is because I would like to be able to change the 
ratio from (say) 75% long when the trend is up and 25% long when the trend is 
down.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
That 
is what I would like to do.   I would be 
satisfied with being constrained to always being 50% long and 
50% short.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
I can 
do something in my AFL to make sure that you always have enough buy and short 
signals to satisfy the minimum number of positions to have on in each direction, 
even if the ticker I use is for a bond-type of fund.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  <FONT face="Times New Roman" 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: Fred 
  [mailto:fctonetti@xxxxxxxxx]Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:26 
  AMTo: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [amibroker] Re: 
  Yo Chuck ... Regarding Staying within Hedge contract boundaries 
  ...Chuck,Please don't answer questions with 
  questions ... what I'm looking for is a specification that you'll be 
  satisfied with and given that the work is gratis as opposed to what would 
  have been charged several hundred dollars an hour for in days gone by I 
  think this is a reasonable request.  Even if it wasn't free I'd still 
  want the specs before I did the work.  I've dealt with users long 
  enough regardless of how sophisticated they are or think they are to know 
  that usually if you assume what they want based on a few general 
  statements that they make rather than asking direct questions that you 
  wind up designing stuff they never use and then having to do it again and 
  given that I'd rather be spending time scuba diving in the Caribbean 
  or a hundred other things I can think of instead of writing s/w I'd 
  really hate to write and have to do it again ...With regards to 
  market neutral capabilities are you wanting to have a single parameter 
  where you can specify a field like MarketNeutralTolerance which would be 
  interpretted as follows ...0  - Implies there's no freedom that 
  you must be long/short 50/50 ...50 - Implies that there's 50% freedom so 
  long/short 75/25 would be okay but so would long/short 25/75or is 
  what you are wanting to have two parameters where you can specify the 
  MarketNeutralMaxLongPct and MarketNeutralMinLongPct which would keep long 
  side investments between the two assuming there were sufficient long 
  candidates and then shorts would be allowed to fill in the 
  gaps.TIA, Fred--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Chuck 
  Rademacher" <chuck_rademacher@x> wrote:> Perhaps this is the 
  question you want answered by me?> > As far as your request for 
  having market neutral capability goes within a> particlar portfolio 
  that is certainly doable but I need to have an answer to> my other 
  question which is what to do with $ when a sell/cover happens and> 
  there are no remaining ranked candidates to chose from that have 
  their> "eyes" on a trade in the same market direction as the one 
  that was just> exited.> > Is the scenario you are 
  questioning any different from one where I simply> don't have any 
  buy signals at all in a "long" only system?   Since "b" and 
  I> both primarily use a timing approach, we are in the market (long), 
  just over> half the time.   Therefore, there will be 
  quite a few instances where we> will have exited long positions and 
  don't wish to take new ones.> > If this is a problem for PT, we 
  could certainly automatically shift the> money (using our own AFL 
  logic) into a known money market or bond fund and> PT wouldn't know 
  the difference.   Of course, in this case we would 
  either> have to automatically increase the amount invested in one 
  instrument or have> multiple instruments (albeit some may be fake) 
  to handle multiple> transactions for the usual amount being invested in 
  normal stocks.> > I hope this makes sense.  This is a 
  fairly complex subject and the English> language, even if it's my 
  only language, can be a challenge at times.Send 
  BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
  suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.