[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 4.35.0 BETA released



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

It seems Microsoft wants some "Killer Apps" for
their not so successful yet platform. Remembers
me to the OS/2 vs. Win war times, where IBM tried
to buy companies only to force them to port their
apps to OS/2. We all know what happened to 
their efforts. IMHO staying independent is the best.
BTW, AB exists longer than .NET ...
And, IMHO it should be higher prioritized porting
AB first to Linux.
Just my .002 cents to this dicussion.
UM
MCSD :-)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 11:49 PM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 4.35.0 BETA released


> Steve,
> If you want everyone to program in C Sharp and/or VB.net, shouldn't you
> ascertain how many are running .NET and tell the others the cost of
> upgrading?
> 
> Bob
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scourt2000 [mailto:steve_hite@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 2:03 PM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 4.35.0 BETA released
> 
> Tomasz, I'll preface what I'm about to say with you provide awesome
> support for your product and it just keeps getting better in better
> with every release.  I never thought one person could do so much in
> so little time.
> 
> But...
> 
> It seems that AFL is trying to grow into a full programming
> language...ala C without pointers.  I know it's your product and you
> can bloody well do what you want with it's future, but I think it's
> future will be an order of magnitude more extensible and powerful by
> migrating Amibroker to a TA/Trading platform based on the .NET
> programming environment.   For example, I could program something in
> C#, someone else can program a trading formula in VB.NET and we can
> both share each other's libraries.  If the GUI were more plug-n-play
> (like the Java IDE's Eclispe or Netbeans or Visual Studio.NET's
> Object Model Hierarchy), you would be able to port your efforts more
> easily to anywhere the Mono Project's .NET is hosted as well (e.g.,
> Linux, MacOS X).
> 
> I know that you know what I'm talking about and there are probably
> many here who don't program and don't know what the heck
> I'm "griping" about, so I stop here and see what the group thinks.
> 
> Thanks for entertaining the thought,
> 
> Steve



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
& No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/BVVfoB/hP.FAA/uetFAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/