|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Oh my, may I suggest a diaper? (Sorry, Herman, I just couldn't resist
that, :-) LOL)
Best Regards,
Mark
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Herman vandenBergen" <psytek@xxxx>
wrote:
> Sorry folks, but this poll is pretty SCARY! In fact i am wetting my
pants!
>
> I would much prefer to have Tomasz concentrate on overall
versatility and
> afl enhancements in general, i.e. work on FEATURES THAT YOU CANNOT
FIND
> ANYWHERE ELSE AND THAT WILL BENEFIT EACH AND EVERY USER.
>
> Face it: almost all special indicators can be implemented with a
little bit
> of work around, some looping, some scripts, or in the extreme case
with a
> DLL. The DLL-list has considerable expertise and some very helpful
people.
>
> If you really think your special indicator will make you a lot of
money then
> it is worth your while to learn (remember the word?) a few new
things.
> Perhaps even pay (YES!) somebody to write a DLL for you. Also, if a
special
> indicator is really that important to you then you could find some
other
> users and combine efforts to get the job done, perhaps even share
the cost
> of hiring somebody for a few hours.
>
> To have TJ sweat on that many individual indicators to have some
user try it
> out and to find that it after all doesn't do the job and to never
look at it
> again, is a waste of time. Yes: I have been there and done it!
>
> Let us be honest: we want those indicators to "try them out" not
because we
> "know" that they are going to make us rich. From the last 200
indicators
> that you tried, how many have made you rich? Obviously not too
many...It is
> like looking for the HG: there is NO single million dollar
indicator.
>
> Any indicator that has less than 20 (30?) votes should be ignored.
Why?
> Because in an equivalent amount of time TJ could implement general
purpose
> AB enhancements that would benefit each and every single user. Some
of these
> enhancements (like the recent looping) would allow probably most of
the
> indicators to be implemented by users themselves.
>
> How many of you have tried the new looping functions? How would you
like
> subroutines? Pyramiding? etc. Some of these functions would benefit
every
> single user...
>
> OK, I will not vote for any indicator: I will vote for general
purpose
> enhancement (should have been an item on the poll?).
>
> best regards,
> Herman
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/AG3JAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|