|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Markus,
you might be able to do it in afl... I haven't used scripts for quite awile.
If i is just working with price arrays we can probably handle it in afl, if
it goes beyond that (scripts, com, etc) i am no good at all. What do you
need?
Herman
psytek@xxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: funnybiz@xxxxxx [mailto:funnybiz@xxxxxx]
Sent: April 25, 2003 5:25 AM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Poll results for amibroker - README
Herman,
are you a looping crack written in JScript/VBScript??
I may need your help, man...
Markus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Herman vandenBergen" <psytek@xxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 5:19 AM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: Poll results for amibroker - README
> Well said, DT, I'll bite my tonque :-)
>
> I respect others and their efforts very much, most know much more than i
do
> ...
>
> It is just that when i look at this long list of indicators and i ask
myself
> how many i actually use? 2-5?
>
> Then, when I look at basic/general functions that I find find listed under
> afl... I see that i use at least fifty or more, and that I could never do
> without them. So which are more important to me? But that is just me...
>
> Forgive me any rude voice in my writing, it was unintended.
>
> take care DT, thanks for the feedback!
>
> Herman.
>
> Ps. When I get a chance I'll post some loops :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS [mailto:TSOKAKIS@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: April 25, 2003 4:51 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Poll results for amibroker - README
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Herman vandenBergen" <psytek@xxxx>
> wrote:
> > Sorry folks, but this poll is pretty SCARY! In fact i am wetting my
> pants!
> >
> > I would much prefer to have Tomasz concentrate on overall
> versatility and
> > afl enhancements in general, i.e. work on FEATURES THAT YOU CANNOT
> FIND
> > ANYWHERE ELSE AND THAT WILL BENEFIT EACH AND EVERY USER.
> >
> > Face it: almost all special indicators can be implemented with a
> little bit
> > of work around, some looping, some scripts, or in the extreme case
> with a
> > DLL. The DLL-list has considerable expertise and some very helpful
> people.
> >
> > If you really think your special indicator will make you a lot of
> money then
> > it is worth your while to learn (remember the word?) a few new
> things.
> > Perhaps even pay (YES!) somebody to write a DLL for you. Also, if a
> special
> > indicator is really that important to you then you could find some
> other
> > users and combine efforts to get the job done, perhaps even share
> the cost
> > of hiring somebody for a few hours.
> >
> > To have TJ sweat on that many individual indicators to have some
> user try it
> > out and to find that it after all doesn't do the job and to never
> look at it
> > again, is a waste of time. Yes: I have been there and done it!
> >
> > Let us be honest: we want those indicators to "try them out" not
> because we
> > "know" that they are going to make us rich. From the last 200
> indicators
> > that you tried, how many have made you rich? Obviously not too
> many...It is
> > like looking for the HG: there is NO single million dollar
> indicator.
>
> > Any indicator that has less than 20 (30?) votes should be ignored.
>
> I will never agree. Never.
> 16 gentle members aske for
> LINEARREG, LINREGSLOPE, TSF, 16 votes
> Will you tell them they are "less than 20"?
> They vote LINEARREG, LINREGSLOPE, TSF because they *believe* they
> need LINEARREG, LINREGSLOPE, TSF for their own personal reasons, to
> make money or make code excersise or just make fun or anything else.
> Just a little respect to their *declared* opinion would not be bad.
> Except if you provide full codes to create their LINEARREG,
> LINREGSLOPE, TSF variable input, this would probably give you reason
> to write similar comments. It is at least democratic to pay respect
> to others vote, no matter if you agree or not, no matter if you vote
> or not. I didnīt vote, because I did not agree to vote, but I
> consider the 16 or the 3 or the single vote as important and serious.
> They are well repsected humans, you can not skip them because they
> are "less than 20".
> DT
> Why?
> > Because in an equivalent amount of time TJ could implement general
> purpose
> > AB enhancements that would benefit each and every single user. Some
> of these
> > enhancements (like the recent looping) would allow probably most of
> the
> > indicators to be implemented by users themselves.
> >
> > How many of you have tried the new looping functions? How would you
> like
> > subroutines? Pyramiding? etc. Some of these functions would benefit
> every
> > single user...
> >
> > OK, I will not vote for any indicator: I will vote for general
> purpose
> > enhancement (should have been an item on the poll?).
> >
> > best regards,
> > Herman
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: April 25, 2003 12:40 AM
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [amibroker] Poll results for amibroker
> >
> >
> >
> > The following amibroker poll is now closed. Here are the
> > final results:
> >
> >
> > POLL QUESTION: In Message 38070, Tomasz suggested that
> > we compose a list of the most desired
> > indicators for dynamic parameters so he
> > can prioritize. PLEASE SELECT YOUR TOP
> > 10 FROM THIS LIST. Note that I combined
> > several similar indicators/functions to
> > keep the list at 25 which is the maximum
> > for a poll. So a combined entry
> > (BBANDBOT & BBANDTOP, for example) only
> > counts as one indicator for the purposes
> > of this poll :-). Poll closes in one
> > week. Thanks for your input! Mark
> >
> > CHOICES AND RESULTS
> > - RWIHI & RWILO, 2 votes, 1.41%
> > - SAR, 8 votes, 5.63%
> > - STOCHK & STOCHD, 12 votes, 8.45%
> > - TRIX, 3 votes, 2.11%
> > - ULTIMATE, 2 votes, 1.41%
> > - WILDERS, 3 votes, 2.11%
> > - HOLD, 2 votes, 1.41%
> > - LINEARREG, LINREGSLOPE, TSF, 16 votes, 11.27%
> > - STDERR & STDEV , 11 votes, 7.75%
> > - ADX, 12 votes, 8.45%
> > - ATR, 7 votes, 4.93%
> > - BBANDBOT & BBANDTOP, 9 votes, 6.34%
> > - CHAIKIN, 3 votes, 2.11%
> > - MACD & SIGNAL, 10 votes, 7.04%
> > - MDI & PDI, 10 votes, 7.04%
> > - MFI, 4 votes, 2.82%
> > - OSCP, 3 votes, 2.11%
> > - OSCV, 1 votes, 0.70%
> > - RSI & CCI, 10 votes, 7.04%
> > - RMI, 1 votes, 0.70%
> > - ROC, 12 votes, 8.45%
> > - RWI, 1 votes, 0.70%
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information about this group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker
> >
> > For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit
> > http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> > Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Check group FAQ at:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading!
Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/cjB9SD/od7FAA/AG3JAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|