|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I’m sorry you think the rest of us only use this product for “fun” …
I never suggested it should be priority one … I would surmise that the developer(s) would always be the one(s) to set the priorities, possibly with input from elsewhere.
As far as MANY of the functions already having the capability of variable periods, I wouldn’t characterize 10 out of a list of 100+ as many and although I see having variable periods as being “nice”, I would much rather have all functions be able to deal with any array whether they be an original data array or an internally in the AFL calculated array first.
> I certainly agree with the last lines. On line AFL is a nice feature
> for adding such info.
> This has nothing to do with the request for a StochD(Array,var)
> function. IMO, it is not priority No1 now.
> I have already prepared similar [and useful, not only for fun]
> formulas with variable periods. You will see the same people who ask
> this vote list, unhappy again for complicated codes etc. etc.
> AFL is powerful for stocks study and application, codes alone is
> nothing.
> If you take a look at this list reference, the discussion for
> variable inputs is more than 2 years old. Many functions do include
> this possibility since 3.50 or so. People just donīt read the manual
> [perhaps they donīt even need it].
> DT
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|