| 
 PureBytes Links 
Trading Reference Links 
 | 
Ken,
Ther are NO stupid questions, only stupid answers.  PLEASE continue 
to contribute. We'll all be the better for it.  Because the idea of 
combining indicators or systems in a meaningful manner has been 
around for awhile does not mean it's not a good idea.  It is ...
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ken Close" <closeks@xxxx> wrote:
> Bob:
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for the references.  The tone of the reply is one that 
certainly
> will encourage other beginners to share their thoughts and 
ideas¡Äbut
> maybe Real World systems is just for experienced hardened 
veterans.  I
> will stay quiet and read from now on, not wanting to waste others¡Ç 
time
> mentioning stuff that has been known for years.  As I recall, the 
person
> who suggested this thread wondered why there was so little response
> initially¡Ä..
> 
> 
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Jagow [mailto:bjagow@x...]
> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 9:19 PM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [amibroker] Real World Systems - Multiple Sub Signals
> 
> 
> 
> What's to mention, Ken?
> 
> 
> 
> The other platform  pushed those binary indicators from DOS days, so
> most MetaStock users teethed on them.
> 
> 
> 
> Dave Evans,  founder of a trading group I'm involved  with, 
propounded
> them and often posted re them on SI's Technical Analysis - Beginners
> 
> 
> 
> Jim Greenville details a system that he has evolved over the years 
at
> http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/
> 
> 
> 
> Bob
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Close [mailto:closeks@x...]
> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 1:51 PM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [amibroker] Real World Systems - Multiple Sub Signals
> 
>  Multiple Sub Signals: - here is a real world trading approach that 
I
> have never seen mentioned here.  I would like to get some reaction.
> This is based on some real world trading that is happening on 
another
> platform that I am helping port over to AB.
> 
> 
> 
> The idea is to have signals for multiple subsystems and then take 
your
> trading signal when a majority of the subsignals ¡Èline up¡É.
> 
> 
> 
> For discussion purposes, visualize a mov avg cross over   AND
> 
> A volume oscillator   AND
> 
> An advance decline curve   AND
> 
> Perhaps a VIX type signal.
> 
> 
> 
> If you let each one be a buy or sell, and call each S1, S2, S3, S4
> 
> 
> 
> then your buy statement could be
> 
> 
> 
> Buy = S1 AND S2 AND S3 AND S4.
> 
> 
> 
> This might be a little too stringent, so perhaps you code it to 
give a
> buy if 3 of the 4 signals are a buy and you do not care which ones.
> 
> 
> 
> In the work that I am doing with this approach, I am seeing that 
each
> S(i) has a return and a dd over a long period of time, but as you 
add
> combinations of the signals, the return increases a little bit but 
the
> dd seems to drop and drop quite a bit.  An example might be returns 
for
> each one individually of say 8-10% CAR and 13-15% dd, but when 3 
out of
> 4 are combined as I describe above, the resulting return might be 9-
12%
> CAR and 6-9% dd.   These are not barn burners, and those seeking or
> actually trading 50-100% CAR systems will laugh as they hit delete, 
but
> for some folks who are risk adverse, or managing retirement 
portfolios,
> or whatever, this kind of approach might have some appeal.
> 
> 
> 
> In the work I have done so far, there has been NO OPTIMIZATION of 
the
> parameters within the subsystems.  Any In sample period compares
> favorably with OOS periods.  The results look steady over 12 years 
of
> data, with variations due to changing market conditions.  (I am not 
sure
> ¡ÈIS and OOS¡É apply when no optimization has been done, but what I 
mean
> is that breaking the total time period up into sections shows no 
real
> degradation or ¡Èblowup¡É of one period relative to the other.)
> 
> 
> 
> The details of the subsystems are not the issue here-what I am 
raising
> is the question of the drawdown dampening effect of the 
combination.  Is
> this a mathematically correct thing to expect?  Does moving in this
> direction promise dd reduction?   Assuming you select subsystems 
that
> are not highly correlated, should you not expect improvements in the
> combination that are not possible in the single subsystems?
> 
> 
> 
> Any comments?  Build-upons?  What?
> 
> 
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> 
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> 
> 
> 
> 
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/M=249982.3083889.4452939.1728375/D=egroupweb/
S=
> 1705632198:HM/A=1524963/R=0/*http:/hits.411web.com/cgi-
bin/autoredir?cam
> p=556&lineid=3083889¢ç=egroupweb&pos=HM>
> 
> 
> 
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
M=249982.3083889.4452939.1728375/D=egrou
> pmail/S=:HM/A=1524963/rand=255463699>
> 
> 
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
 
 |