[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: Efficiency & ATR (Al V. & Jayson)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  The 
  concept of using a greater position size on lower volatility seems like it 
  could be a dangerous trap. In many cases a stocks volatility will dry up while 
  in a consolidation. Specifically when approaching significant support/ 
  resistance levels. Once the stock breaks (one way or the other) often times 
  the volatility can increase dramatically. Does not this approach leave you 
  vulnerable to being in an oversized position at exactly the 
  wrong time? 
   
  Jayson, I don't think so. Don't forget, you are 
  running stops based on your volatility setting, which remains fixed for the 
  trade duration. If the stock suddenly goes against you big, you lose. But you 
  would lose using any kind of stoploss (or no stoploss at all). True, you will 
  be in a larger position than when the volatility is higher, but that 
  could also work in your favor, too, if the price went in the direction of 
  your trade. Also, you can mitigate sudden changes in volatility by choosing a 
  long enough period for the ATR calculation (like 15 or 18 days rather than 10 
  or even less). You have to base your positionsize on something, and I think it 
  makes eminent sense to base it on volatility. It's worth doing some 
  backtesting. 
   
  AV
   
   Jayson 
  <FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Original Message-----From: phsst 
  [mailto:phsst@xxxxxxxxx]Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:47 
  PMTo: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [amibroker] Re: 
  Efficiency & ATR (Al V. & Jayson)"trade 
  restriction" meant that I had deliberately 'restricted' eachand every 
  trade PositionSize to $20K.The huge decrease in RAR was a surprise to 
  me too. That is what Imeant by stating that I had not done any due 
  diligence yet, thereforedon't read too much into the post that I made. But 
  thinking about it,even though the profits increased by 30%+ the 
  positionsize changecould have increased the capital requirements 
  significantly enough forthe trading system that RAR could have been 
  affected that much. Idon't know exactly how TJ calculates RAR, but it 
  would be logical thatRAR is dependent upon capital requirements for the 
  trading systemmeasured against the profit gains, all in combination with 
  the holdingperiod (exposure of capital).The comment about 
  reversing positionsize computation was simply aspeculation it would be 
  interesting to measure trading systems in twoways... 1) allocating greater 
  positionsize to lower volatility trades,and 2) allocating greater 
  positionsize to higher volatility trades.While it might not make sense, it 
  might be an interesting study... Younever know.BTW... what 
  software did you reply to the post? I'd like to use colortext for some 
  replies, but don't see a way to do it with the YahooPost or Reply browser 
  screen.Regards,Phsst--- In 
  amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Al Venosa" <advenosa@xxxx> wrote:> I 
  changed my pullback backtest to use your variable PositionSize = -1> * 
  BuyPrice/(2*ATR(15)).> > System went from $20k / trade 
  restriction to a range of $10k to $75k> per trade.> > I'm 
  not sure I follow you. What do you mean by "trade restriction"?Need more 
  info. > > Overall profit from the system increased about 30+%, 
  but RAR dropped> from 142% to just 6%+.> > That's a huge 
  decrease in RAR. I don't understand how you canincrease your overall 
  profits yet have such a huge decline in RAR.> > Have not done 
  any meaningful due diligence on results yet but was> astonished at how 
  some numbers changed. If the reported RAR number is> valid then it 
  might mean that some trading systems should reverse the> PositionSize 
  calculation.> > Again you've lost me. What do you mean by 
  reversing the positionsize statement? Can you be a little more specific? 
  > > Appreciate your idea, along with Chuck, Jayson, Graham & 
  Freds comments.> > Phsst> > > --- In 
  amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Al Venosa" <advenosa@xxxx> wrote:> 
  > I Agree that Raw ATR numbers are of little use. > > > 
  > Jayson, I presume you mean 'of little use' in relation to 
  defining> efficient stocks. However, ATR can be very useful in 
  establishing> positionsize. For example, many traders use a multiple of 
  ATR to> establish not only a max stoploss point but also to help 
  calculate how> big of an investment to make in a trade. Thus, risking 
  1% of current> equity in a trade, you can decide to take a position 
  using the> formula: PositionSize = -1 * BuyPrice/(2*ATR(15)). Here, raw 
  ATR is> very useful because if you happen to buy during a highly 
  volatile> time, your position size is lower because the 2*ATR is in 
  the> denominator. Conversely, if the volatility is low at the time of 
  the> buy, your position size is higher. This is a very effective 
  position> sizing strategy. > > > > Al V.> 
  > > >       Yahoo! Groups 
  Sponsor 
  >             
  ADVERTISEMENT>            
  >      >      
  > > > Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx> Send 
  SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx> 
  -----------------------------------------> Post AmiQuote-related 
  messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)> 
  --------------------------------------------> Check group FAQ at:<A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
  Service.Send BUG REPORTS to 
  bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
  suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
  Send 
  BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
  suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT  









Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.