|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I have used this before without any problems, maybe it is something
within the formula itself. Perhaps you could post this this, unless it
is state secret :)
Cheers,
Graham
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Molchanoff <nkm@xxxxxxxxx> [mailto:nkm@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 5:58 AM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [amibroker] Weird Problem with Filter Statement (Tomasz)
In order to more conveniently edit and comment out & comment in my
Filter statement, I moved it up near the top of my AFL code.
I thought that this simple re-location of the statement should not
affect its operation, as long as it still appeared before the
exploration statements in the code.
However, with the Filter Statement at the top of the code, the
exploration runs as if it is not there at all -- Moving the Filter
Statement (or a copy of it) back down to just before the exploration,
makes it operational again.
Is this proper operation?
Shouldn't this work no matter where in the code the Filter statement
is located? (As long as it's above the exploration statements?)
Is there a specific limit to the number of lines of AFL code tht may
be located between the Filter statement and the exploration
statements?
Are there any other specific rules or limitations on where the Filter
statement must be placed to operate properly?
Best Regards
Nick Molchanoff
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
Check group FAQ at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|