[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] ATR-Based Position Size (was NDX/QQQ)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Jerome, I deleted everything but your reply to keep this email message small since I guess my emails contain lots of redundant HTML code. Thanks for the suggestion. I have, in the past, done the very thing you suggested by placing a maximum on my position size statement. Regarding your comment about explosion of volatility at the moment of entry, this could have 2 consequences: (1) the price goes in your favor, or (2) it goes against you. If it goes in your favor, I think you would agree you'd love it. If it's against you, you'll have a max stoploss in place anyway, so even if it shoots beyond your stoploss, in all likelihood you will get out with still a minor loss (albeit larger than you had planned). I don't believe this is a big enough problem to worry that much about. Maybe I'm wrong. I am a believer in volatility-based position-sizing, and many people do it successfully. There are risks in everything we do in this business. This is one risk I guess I'm willing to take until experience tells me otherwise. Thanks for the warning.Al Venosa>From: Jerome ULRICH >Reply-To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: >Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: NDX / QQQ-Can itbe traded? !!!! >Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:19:16 +0100 > >Yes Al, this answers my question. > >Regarding backtesting one stock, you must evaluate how much you can trade in >the stock in order to remain in the limit of your initial slippage input. If >you really want to do it seriously (which I advice), do the test with tick >datas. Then, once you have your limit, program it in AFL. Taking your >example : > >PositionSize = -1*BuyPrice/(2*ATR(15)); >YourLimit = ;//here enter the maximum amount you can trade >PositionSize = IIF(PositionSize > YourLimit;YourLimit;PositionSize); > >Also, since I know your are interested in Position sizing, basing your size >on ATR can be tricky. If you enter your trade after a long period of very >low volatility, you will be overloaded if volatility explodes at the moment >you enter your trade. The contrary, being undernloaded, is much less of a >problem (and rarely faced anyway). But this is a bit off topic in this tread STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/) Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.