[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [amibroker] Re: NDX / QQQ-Can itbe traded? !!!!



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Hello 
Fred,
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Backtesting system on a constant dollar trades basis enables you to 
calculate the expectency of your system. Then, you can apply your position 
sizing algorism, which should include at least a minimum size under which 
trading should be stopped (that applies especially to professionnal traders that 
have fix costs to take into account), and a maximum size above which the 
commission/slippage you included in your test non longer 
applies.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
Best 
regards, Jérôme ULRICH

  <FONT face=Tahoma 
  size=2>-----Message d'origine-----De : Fred 
  <fctonetti@xxxxxxxxx> 
  [mailto:fctonetti@xxxxxxxxx]Envoyé : mercredi 5 février 2003 
  15:13À : amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxObjet : 
  [amibroker] Re: NDX / QQQ-Can itbe traded? 
  !!!!Yuki,I'm not arguing your statement in 
  terms of how one might trade in the real world, but you are not going to 
  design & optimize a trading system based on constant dollar trades are 
  you ?  especially if that sysem is designed to trade a broad index 
  like NDX as represented by QQQ's or for that matter the hundred stocks it 
  represents.--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga 
  <yukitaga@xxxx> wrote:> Hi Fred,> > Wednesday, 
  February 5, 2003, 10:45:49 PM, you wrote:> > Ffyc> Maybe when 
  I get to $50mm I'd agree with you, but to limit> Ffyc> position 
  sizes produces unrealistic results> > Sorry, but you are quite 
  wrong.  I thought you were a trader, too,> but now I'm wondering. 
  It is unrealistic, quite unrealistic, not to> limit position sizes to 
  positions that can slip in and out of a> market without distorting it, 
  or actually becoming the market.> > Trading anything even close 
  to that size, or allowing it to be> considered as a test, in most 
  stocks, is producing results that> cannot be obtained in real trades, 
  therefore the results are absurd.> > I would guess you would 
  have to scale down drastically in many issues> that are less liquid 
  than others.  You can do it or not as you see> fit, but don't 
  expect much respect for the numbers you are posting if> you 
  don't.  They are absurd.>  > Best,> > 
  Yuki> > mailto:yukitaga@xxxxPost 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT  









Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)

Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.