|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Fred,
you may post or not post anything you like.
The sure thing is that ^NDX crossed its support, as predicted[and
described with details], with or without your secret code.
The sure thing is that CSCO came gently to the $13 level again and my
broker will be happy to take his 0.5% for the last leg of the
predicted [and described with details] 13-15-13-15-13 sequence.
With or without your secret code.
Frankly speaking, I did not see any obstacle, everything was done
quietly and without delays.
The procedure was described clearly, before the bell, as usual and
anybody could make some [real] profits.
Of course, ladies and gentlemen of this list have their own
respectable opinion and they are serious enough to make [and enjoy]
their own decisions. Nobody is waiting from me/you/anybody to dictate
what to do with their [real] money.
The point you miss here is the dialogue, this is what we can do, to
expose and share ideas and be better tomorrow.
Do not doubt, we will survive with or without secret codes.
The weak point, IMHO, is that you will not improve your code without
dialogue.
But, perhaps it is perfect indeed and does not need any further
improvement !!
As for myself, I am more than happy reading the excellent
contribution by Franko at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/32997
This is the spirit of the list, enjoy if you find anything attractive
here [and I am sure you will]
Dimitris
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred <fctonetti@xxxx>"
> > <fctonetti@xxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Really ? What was the last piece of AA code that you saw posted
> > that
> > > worked i.e. had a MAR (CAR / MDD) of > 5 or 10 and that covered
> > > enough time to have at least a hundred trades.
> > >
> > > I've seen some that was posted that worked for the last week or
> > month
> > > or maybe even as far back as the beginning of the bear market
but
> I
> > > have yet to see anyone post anything that works in good markets
> and
> > > bad.
> > >
> > > Why did I post the results ? Maybe just to provide some
> incentive
> > > that it could be done. This particular system may be mildly
> clever
> > > but it is not complex. IMHO most things that work usually
aren't
> > > complex.
> > >
> > > I sincerely apologize if I have missed something here.
> > > Regards
> > > Fred
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "jnk1997 <jnk1997@xxxx>"
> > > <jnk1997@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > Fred,
> > > >
> > > > I may have missed something here, but did you post your AFL
> > formula
> > > > for this trading?
> > > > If not, what was the purpose of posting these results?
> > > > Most contributors here include their formula for the group. I
> > have
> > > > rarely seen "teaser" results posted without formulas.
> > > > Seems like a waste of bandwith on this site.
> > > >
> > > > I sincerely apologize if I have missed something here.
> > > > Regards
> > > > Jim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred <fctonetti@xxxx>"
> > > > <fctonetti@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Rick,
> > > > >
> > > > > Reread the previous posts ... The system trades at the
close
> > and
> > > > has
> > > > > no stops therefore intraday activity is a non issue. It
was
> > > > written
> > > > > to be tested on NDX as QQQ has insufficient history IMHO.
> > > > >
> > > > > FT
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Rick Parsons"
> > > <RickParsons@xxxx>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > NDX / QQQ - Can it be traded ?Sorry, I came in late to
this
> > > > > conversation. The discussion is on QQQ's which currently
> trade
> > > > > around 24.50. Why the first entry price of 1,364? Are you
> > using
> > > > the
> > > > > $NDX?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not sure if Al's concern about entry and exits on
the
> > same
> > > > day
> > > > > using EOD data have been answered. Has this been tested on
> > > > intraday
> > > > > data?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rick
> > > > > > No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
> However
> > a
> > > > > large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Fred Tonetti [mailto:ftonetti@x...]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:00 PM
> > > > > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Subject: [amibroker] NDX / QQQ - Can it be traded ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Herman,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't really agree with you but such is …
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here again the system really should be reoptimized with
> > these
> > > > > settings …
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But to humor you attached is the same system w/0.5%
> > > commissions
> > > > > not reoptimized.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I added in Entry/Exit prices so you can do whatever
other
> > > math
> > > > > you'd like in Excel …
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <<...>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to:
> > > > amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > (Web page:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Check group FAQ at:
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms
> of
> > > > > Service.
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|