|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I wish I could! I am still in the learning stage. Now if I was
proficient at afl, I would try using the vix as a variable input to
whatever you choose. The higher the vix, the faster your indicator
would look back in history and the faster it would change. Not sure
if I am making myself clear.
I mostly just watch it along with several indices. Looking for
extremes.
John
--- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx> wrote:
> This is for Mr. Hiroshi Sato, perhaps.
> I did not see indications for a technical rebound in N100 yet.
> Besides that, how about vix?
> Any specific code/analysis ?
> DT
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, "John" <jarnold01@xxxx> wrote:
> > DT,
> >
> > "Sure, this is just a technical rebound" could be when the vix
hits
> > 50. You may want to watch that.
> >
> > John
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx> wrote:
> > > To mention here Hiroshi Sato, general manager at Cosmo
> Securities'
> > > equities department in Tokyo.
> > > "Sure, this is just a technical rebound, but let's enjoy it
while
> > it
> > > lasts,"
> > > [from http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/021010/markets_global_10.html]
> > > DT
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
wrote:
> > > > Many people were named guru during the bullish years.
> > > > They were not educated in fundamental or technical analysis.
> > > > They were just pushing prices higher and higher.
> > > > MACD was a fine solution for charts, as long as it was not
> > crossing
> > > > its signal for months !!
> > > > StochD was not important, it was from 60 to 90 for exrended
> > periods.
> > > > Crazy P/Es were promissing huge profits not only for us but
for
> > the
> > > 3
> > > > next generations !!
> > > > Crazy profits in new tech for example, when I payed $1800
back
> in
> > > > 1989 for my brand new 386 and less than the half for my
> PIII/800
> > in
> > > > 2000 !!
> > > > After the end of the bubble, the same people walked the
> dangerous
> > > > [and wrong] path : they continued serving the bullish dream.
> > > > In any local trough, the very next day after the reaction,
they
> > > were
> > > > giving bold promises for a new high.
> > > > The reason is simple : they did not know something else to do.
> > > > But the market was falling again and again.
> > > > Nearly 3 years later some people still remain on this bullish
> > > dream,
> > > > some gurus still remain on the same side, but who cares !!
> > > > They did not see the bearish reality, which is much more real
> > than
> > > > the bullish bubble.
> > > > We should face the recent example : What happened yesterday ?
> > > > YHOO announced a third-quarter profit of 5 cents a share late
> > > > Wednesday,
> > > > a penny above estimates, and raised its revenue forecast for
> > 2002.
> > > > Aetna Inc. New (NYSE:AET) had some optimistic forecasts, GE
> will
> > > > announce a profit report before the Friday´s open.
> > > > Are these [and some other minor] events the reason for an
> > > > enthusiastic gap up ?
> > > > I would consider more important to read an announcement for
> > > divident
> > > > payment for some "great" companies.
> > > > [You may see also
> > > >
> >
http://money.cnn.com/2002/10/10/pf/investing/q_dividends/index.htm]
> > > > This would be a serious reason to buy and hold
> some "promissing"
> > > > stocks of the "new" tech.
> > > > Else I am obliged to invent new techniques to take a +10%
from
> > > CSCO,
> > > > applying a "take the money and run" logic.
> > > > I will be a fool if I forget that the last 2 months CSCO
price
> > did
> > > > not pay any respect to ANY technical support.
> > > > Does this behavior reflects the company perspectives [to
apply
> > the
> > > No
> > > > 1 Stockmarket axiom]?
> > > > I am not the authorised person to answer. Did we see any
> serious
> > > > reply to this fundamental question by any authorised person ?
> > > > [If positive, please let me know...]. Was there any serious
> > > > fundamental reason to drop from $15 [Aug22] to $8.5 [Oct10]
in
> 32
> > > > trading days ???
> > > > Probably not.
> > > > We have to understand that we are alone in this wild market,
we
> > do
> > > > not need any uneducated guru to give any advise.
> > > > The only solution, in my opinion, is our continuous
fundamental
> > and
> > > > technical education.
> > > > And especially for this technical part, Amibroker forum is
one
> of
> > > the
> > > > best.
> > > > Enough for now, it is 10:00 and ^Gdax opens.
> > > > Thank you for the opportunity.
> > > > Dimitris Tsokakis
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "eseward_2000" <eseward_2000@xxxx>
wrote:
> > > > > Thanks, Dimitris; that was worth reading.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> http://money.cnn.com/2002/10/09/markets/strategists/index.htm
> > > > > > Interesting and educative.
> > > > > > DT
|