|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
DT,
"Sure, this is just a technical rebound" could be when the vix hits
50. You may want to watch that.
John
--- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx> wrote:
> To mention here Hiroshi Sato, general manager at Cosmo Securities'
> equities department in Tokyo.
> "Sure, this is just a technical rebound, but let's enjoy it while
it
> lasts,"
> [from http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/021010/markets_global_10.html]
> DT
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx> wrote:
> > Many people were named guru during the bullish years.
> > They were not educated in fundamental or technical analysis.
> > They were just pushing prices higher and higher.
> > MACD was a fine solution for charts, as long as it was not
crossing
> > its signal for months !!
> > StochD was not important, it was from 60 to 90 for exrended
periods.
> > Crazy P/Es were promissing huge profits not only for us but for
the
> 3
> > next generations !!
> > Crazy profits in new tech for example, when I payed $1800 back in
> > 1989 for my brand new 386 and less than the half for my PIII/800
in
> > 2000 !!
> > After the end of the bubble, the same people walked the dangerous
> > [and wrong] path : they continued serving the bullish dream.
> > In any local trough, the very next day after the reaction, they
> were
> > giving bold promises for a new high.
> > The reason is simple : they did not know something else to do.
> > But the market was falling again and again.
> > Nearly 3 years later some people still remain on this bullish
> dream,
> > some gurus still remain on the same side, but who cares !!
> > They did not see the bearish reality, which is much more real
than
> > the bullish bubble.
> > We should face the recent example : What happened yesterday ?
> > YHOO announced a third-quarter profit of 5 cents a share late
> > Wednesday,
> > a penny above estimates, and raised its revenue forecast for
2002.
> > Aetna Inc. New (NYSE:AET) had some optimistic forecasts, GE will
> > announce a profit report before the Friday´s open.
> > Are these [and some other minor] events the reason for an
> > enthusiastic gap up ?
> > I would consider more important to read an announcement for
> divident
> > payment for some "great" companies.
> > [You may see also
> >
http://money.cnn.com/2002/10/10/pf/investing/q_dividends/index.htm]
> > This would be a serious reason to buy and hold some "promissing"
> > stocks of the "new" tech.
> > Else I am obliged to invent new techniques to take a +10% from
> CSCO,
> > applying a "take the money and run" logic.
> > I will be a fool if I forget that the last 2 months CSCO price
did
> > not pay any respect to ANY technical support.
> > Does this behavior reflects the company perspectives [to apply
the
> No
> > 1 Stockmarket axiom]?
> > I am not the authorised person to answer. Did we see any serious
> > reply to this fundamental question by any authorised person ?
> > [If positive, please let me know...]. Was there any serious
> > fundamental reason to drop from $15 [Aug22] to $8.5 [Oct10] in 32
> > trading days ???
> > Probably not.
> > We have to understand that we are alone in this wild market, we
do
> > not need any uneducated guru to give any advise.
> > The only solution, in my opinion, is our continuous fundamental
and
> > technical education.
> > And especially for this technical part, Amibroker forum is one of
> the
> > best.
> > Enough for now, it is 10:00 and ^Gdax opens.
> > Thank you for the opportunity.
> > Dimitris Tsokakis
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "eseward_2000" <eseward_2000@xxxx> wrote:
> > > Thanks, Dimitris; that was worth reading.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
wrote:
> > > > http://money.cnn.com/2002/10/09/markets/strategists/index.htm
> > > > Interesting and educative.
> > > > DT
|