[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: zig() read this one



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Yes, i think only p is not stable.
Nice try at the diagram
nand



--- In amibroker@xxxx, "wdbaker8" <wdbaker8@xxxx> wrote:
> Ok, I am re-doing this so it makes more sense. the periods are 
just 
> to fill space in the diagram below.
> 
> In using zig for support resistance, the first line is not stable 
> but the second line back is stable, is this a correct assumption. 
> example:
> p2......p1
> -.......- 
> .-.....-.-.....p
> ..-...-...-...-
> ...-.-.....-.-
> ....-.......-
> ....t2......t1
> 
> current peak or "p" is not stable???
> peak(close,1,1) or p1 is stable
> peak(close,1,2) or p2 is stable
> trough(close,1,1) or t1 is stable???
> trough(close,1,2) or t2 is stable
> 
> Would these assumptions be correct?
> 
> Thanks
> wdbaker
> 
> 
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, "wdbaker8" <wdbaker8@xxxx> wrote:
> > Ok, I am re-doing this so it makes more sense. the periods are 
just 
> > to fill space in the diagram below.
> > 
> > In using zig for support resistance, the first line is not stable 
> > but the second line back is stable, is this a correct 
assumption. 
> > example:
> > p2......p1
> > -.......- 
> > .-.....-.-.....p
> > ..-...-...-...-
> > ...-.-.....-.-
> > ....-.......-
> > ....t2......t1
> > 
> > current peak or "p" is not stable???
> > peak(close,1,1) or p1 is stable
> > peak(close,1,2) or p2 is stable
> > trough(close,1,1) or t1 is stable???
> > trough(close,1,2) or t2 is stable
> > 
> > Would these assumptions be correct?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > wdbaker
> > 
> > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "wdbaker8" <wdbaker8@xxxx> wrote:
> > > I just realized that the diagram I tried to do didn't work so 
> well, 
> > > but if you go and try to reply you will be able to see it fine.
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > wdbaker
> > > 
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "wdbaker8" <wdbaker8@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > In using zig for support resistance, the first line is not 
> stable 
> > > but 
> > > > the second line back is stable, is this a correct 
assumption. 
> > > > example:
> > > > 
> > > > p2 p1
> > > > - - 
> > > > - - - p
> > > > - - - -
> > > > - - - -
> > > > - -
> > > > t2 t1
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > current peak or "p" is not stable???
> > > > peak(close,1,1) or p1 is stable
> > > > peak(close,1,2) or p2 is stable
> > > > trough(close,1,1) or t1 is stable???
> > > > trough(close,1,2) or t2 is stable
> > > > 
> > > > Would these assumptions be correct?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > wdbaker